RESUMEN
This study compared conventional ompA genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis with multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus typing (MLT) DNA microarray. DNA extracts of 104 C. trachomatis positive specimens were analyzed by ompA sequencing and MLST and of these 76 by MLT array. Obtained MLST sequence types (STs) were compared to sequences in the database http://mlstdb.uu.se. The resolution obtained for MLST (35 STs) was 2.1 higher than for ompA sequencing (17 variants) and 1.3 higher than MLT array (27 MLT groups). Among the 104 samples the predominant genotype E could be divided into 5 ompA variants and 23 STs of which 16 had not been reported in previous studies. The most common STs, ST3 and ST56, were identified as founders and are common in several countries on a global scale. The MLST and the MLT array provided similar strain discrimination capacity and showed considerably higher resolution than conventional ompA sequencing.
Asunto(s)
Chlamydia trachomatis/clasificación , Tipificación Molecular/métodos , Argentina , Chile , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , GenotipoRESUMEN
Chlamydia trachomatis is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections worldwide. Based on sequence variation in the ompA gene encoding the major outer membrane protein, the genotyping scheme distinguishes 17 recognized genotypes, i.e. A, B, Ba, C, D, Da, E, F, G, H, I, Ia, J, K, L1, L2, and L3. Genotyping is an important tool for epidemiological tracking of C. trachomatis infections, including the revelation of transmission pathways and association with tissue tropism and pathogenicity. Moreover, genotyping can be useful for clinicians to establish the correct treatment when LGV strains are detected. Recently a microarray assay was described that offers several advantages, such as rapidity, ease of standardization and detection of mixed infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the DNA microarray-based assay for C. trachomatis genotyping of clinical samples already typed by PCR-RFLP from South America. The agreement between both typing techniques was 90.05% and the overall genotype distribution obtained with both techniques was similar. Detection of mixed-genotype infections was significantly higher using the microarray assay (8.4% of cases) compared to PCR-RFLP (0.5%). Among 178 samples, the microarray assay identified 10 ompA genotypes, i.e. D, Da, E, F, G, H, I, J, K and L2. The most predominant type was genotype E, followed by D and F.