RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The cross-sectional study evaluates if the pre-pandemic work environments in nursing homes predict COVID-19 cases among residents and staff, accounting for other factors. METHOD: Leveraging data from a survey of California and Ohio nursing homes (n = 340), we examined if Workplace Integrated Safety and Health domains - Leadership, Participation, and Comprehensive and Collaborative strategies predicted cumulative COVID-19 cases among nursing home residents and staff. RESULTS: In Ohio, a 1-unit increase in Leadership score was associated with 2 fewer staff cases and 4 fewer resident cases. A 1-unit increase in Comprehensive and Collaborative Strategies score in California showed an average marginal effect of approximately 1 less staff case and 2 fewer resident cases. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that leadership commitment and inter-department collaboration to prioritize worker safety, may have protected against COVID-19 cases in nursing homes.

RESUMEN

Importance: Limited access to appropriate specialists and testing may be associated with delayed diagnosis and symptom management for patients with early-onset Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRDs). Objectives: To examine rural vs urban differences in diagnostic and symptom management service use among patients with early-onset ADRDs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted using commercial claims from 2012 to 2017. Included patients were those with early-onset ADRDs aged 40 to 64 years, including new patients, defined as those with no claims of ADRDs for 36 months before the first ADRD diagnosis. The likelihood of receiving diagnostic and symptom management services was estimated, with adjustment for individual-level variables associated with health care use. Data were analyzed from February 2021 to March 2022. Exposures: Rural residence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Among patients with new, early-onset ADRDs, use of psychological assessment and neuropsychological testing performed at the initial diagnosis (index date) or 90 days or less after the index date and use of brain imaging during the 180 days before the index date were collected. Access to different clinicians on the index date or 90 days or less after the index date was also collected, including visits to primary care physicians and nurse practitioners (PCPs) and specialty visits to psychologists, neurologists, and psychiatrists. Results: Among 71 799 patients with early-onset ADRD (mean [SD] age, 56.34 [6.05] years; 39 231 women [54.64%]), 8430 individuals had new early-onset ADRDs (mean [SD] age, 55.94 [6.30] years; 16 512 women [56.65%]). There were no statistically significant differences between new patients with early-onset ADRDs in rural vs urban areas in the use of psychological assessments, imaging studies, or visits to neurologists or psychiatrists. However, new patients in rural areas were less likely to receive neuropsychological testing (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.98) or visit a psychologist (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.85) compared with patients in urban areas. However, new patients in rural areas with early-onset ADRDs were more likely to have only PCP visits for diagnosis and symptom management compared with those in urban areas (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19-1.66). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that new patients with early-onset ADRDs in rural areas were less likely to receive neuropsychological testing or visit psychologists but more likely to be diagnosed and treated exclusively by PCPs compared with those in urban areas. These findings suggest that efforts, such as clinician education or teleconsultative guidance to PCPs, may be needed to enhance access to specialist services in rural areas.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Gastric cancer, a malignant and highly proliferative condition, has significantly affected a large population around the globe and is known to be caused by various factors including genetic, epigenetic, and environmental influences. Though the global trend of these cancers is declining, an increase in its frequency is still a threat because of changing lifestyles and dietary habits. However, genetic and epigenetic alterations related to gastric cancers also have an equivalent contribution towards carcinogenic development. DNA methylation is one of the major forms of epigenetic modification which plays a significant role in gastric carcinogenesis. Methylation leads to inactivation of some of the most important genes like DNA repair genes, cell cycle regulators, apoptotic genes, transcriptional regulators, and signalling pathway regulators; which subsequently cause uncontrolled proliferation of cells. Mutations in these genes can be used as suitable prognostic markers for early diagnosis of the disease, since late diagnosis of gastric cancers has a huge negative impact on overall patient survival. In this review, we focus on the important epigenetic mutations that contribute to the development of gastric cancer and the molecular pathogenesis underlying each of them. Methylation, acetylation, and histone modifications play an integral role in the onset of genomic instability, one of the many contributory factors to gastric cancer. This article also covers the constraints of incomplete knowledge of epigenetic factors influencing gastric cancer, thus throwing light on our understanding of the disease.