RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: An orally disintegrating film (ODF) formulation of vitamin D3 that dissolves rapidly in the mouth without drinking or chewing may be a worthwhile alternative to currently available drug products for therapeutic vitamin D supplementation. This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of a single dose of a vitamin D3 25000 I.U. ODF with those of a marketed oral vitamin D3 preparation in healthy subjects. METHODS: This Phase 1, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study compared the pharmacokinetics of calcifediol [25(OH)D3], the precursor of bioactive vitamin D3, after a single dose of a new vitamin D3 25,000 I.U. ODF with those of a Reference formulation (vitamin D3 25000 I.U./2.5 mL oral solution) in healthy adult subjects using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay. The primary objective was bioavailability under fed conditions, defined as maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 25(OH)D3 and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). The pharmacokinetics of 25(OH)D3 were also evaluated following the ODF administration under fasting conditions. Subjects were randomised to receive a single dose of the vitamin D3 25000 I.U. ODF or the Reference oral solution under fed conditions or the vitamin D3 ODF under fasting conditions. RESULTS: Forty-eight healthy subjects were randomised and completed the study. Overall, the pharmacokinetic profile was very similar across the three treatment groups, and bioavailability did not significantly differ among treatments. Under fed conditions, mean 25(OH)D3 plasma values for Cmax were 6.68 ± 2.03 versus 6.61 ± 2.62 ng/mL for the Test versus Reference formulations. Corresponding values for AUC0-t were 2364.80 ± 1336.97 versus 2150.52 ± 1622.76 ng/mL × h. Mean Cmax was slightly lower (6.68 ± 2.03 vs 7.23 ± 1.48 ng/mL) and the time to reach peak concentration was delayed (144 h [36-312] versus 42 h (2-480]) with the ODF under fed versus fasting conditions (p = 0.0371). The point estimates and 90 % CIs of the Testfed/Referencefed ratios of the geometric means showed that the bioavailability of exogenous 25(OH)D3 was, both in rate and extent of absorption, slightly higher with the vitamin D3 ODF than the vitamin D3 oral solution under the administration conditions recommended for the vitamin D3 oral solution. Palatability and ease of use of the ODF were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The new ODF 25000 I.U. formulation provided a valuable alternative to the marketed oral solution for therapeutic vitamin D supplementation, with a bioavailability that was slightly higher than that of the vitamin D3 oral solution administered under the same conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered with the ISRCTN Registry (Registry code: ISRCTN13208948) on 27 November 2020.
Asunto(s)
Colecalciferol , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Administración Oral , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Cromatografía Liquida , Estudios Cruzados , Ayuno , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Comprimidos , Equivalencia TerapéuticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A 1-mL aqueous solution for parenteral injection containing diclofenac sodium and hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin, presently on the market for intramuscular and subcutaneous administration (Akis®/Dicloin®), was further developed for intravenous (i.v.) bolus administration. OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to compare the tolerability and diclofenac pharmacokinetics after a single i.v. bolus of the investigational solution to those of other parenteral diclofenac products. METHODS: The study comprised three parts: (i) Part 1: an exploratory dose-escalation study to evaluate the tolerability of 25 mg/1 mL, 50 mg/1 mL and 75 mg/1 mL diclofenac sodium formulations administered as a single 5-s i.v. bolus; (ii) Part 2: an exploratory, randomised, crossover study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac following 5-, 15-, and 30-s i.v. bolus injections of diclofenac sodium 75 mg/1 mL; (iii) Part 3: a randomised crossover study to compare the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac following a 5-s i.v. bolus of the 75 mg/1 mL solution to the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac following a 30-min i.v. infusion or intramuscular administration of a 75 mg/3 mL reference formulation. RESULTS: The extent of exposure to diclofenac sodium afforded by the 5-s i.v. bolus of 75 mg/1 mL was equivalent to that provided by the 30-min i.v. infusion of 75 mg/3 mL, since the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last plasma concentration time t (AUC0-t) was within the limits 80.00-125.00%, as was the 90% confidence interval of the GMR of the AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞). The maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was approximately 2.7-fold higher and was achieved earlier (0.05 vs. 0.50 h) with the 1 mL than with the 3 mL formulation, and was similar to data published for a 75 mg/2 mL formulation given as a 15-s i.v. bolus. CONCLUSIONS: Diclofenac sodium 75 mg/1 mL solution administered as a 5-s i.v. bolus was well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic profile, which showed a faster onset and a higher concentration peak than seen for other products and administration routes, suggests a superior analgesic effect.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacocinética , Diclofenaco/efectos adversos , Diclofenaco/farmacocinética , 2-Hidroxipropil-beta-Ciclodextrina/administración & dosificación , 2-Hidroxipropil-beta-Ciclodextrina/efectos adversos , 2-Hidroxipropil-beta-Ciclodextrina/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Estudios Cruzados , Diclofenaco/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Inyecciones Intravenosas/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
A new orodispersible film formulation of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil, has been developed to examine the advantages of an orally disintegrating film formulation and provide an alternative to the current marketed products for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. The pharmacokinetics of the sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film (IBSA) was compared to that of the conventional marketed 100 mg film-coated tablet (Viagra®) after single-dose administration to 53 healthy male volunteers (aged 18-51 years) in a randomized, open, two-way crossover bioequivalence study. Each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg of sildenafil as test or reference formulation administered under fasting conditions at each of the two study periods according to a randomized crossover design. There was a washout interval of ≥7 days between the two administrations of the investigational medicinal products. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected up to 24 h post-dosing. The primary objective was to compare the rate (peak plasma concentration; Cmax) and extent (area under the curve [AUC] from administration to last observed concentration time; AUC0-t) of sildenafil absorption after single-dose administration of test and reference. Secondary endpoints were observed to describe the plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of sildenafil and its metabolite N-desmethyl-sildenafil relative bioavailability and safety profile after single-dose administration. The mean sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil plasma concentration-time profiles up to 24 h after single-dose administration of sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film and film-coated tablet were nearly superimposable. The bioequivalence test was fully satisfied for sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil in terms of rate and extent of bioavailability. Adverse events occurred at similar rates for the two formulations and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The results suggest that the new orodispersible film formulation can be used interchangeably with the conventional film-coated formulation.
Asunto(s)
Composición de Medicamentos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/farmacocinética , Citrato de Sildenafil/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/administración & dosificación , Citrato de Sildenafil/administración & dosificación , Comprimidos/administración & dosificación , Comprimidos/uso terapéutico , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to investigate the efficacy and safety of a medicated plaster containing betamethasone valerate (BMV) 2.25 mg in patients with chronic elbow tendinopathy. METHODS: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with assignment 2:2:1:1 to BMV medicated plaster applied daily for 12 hours, daily for 24 hours or matched placebo. 62 patients aged ≥18 years with chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy were randomized. The primary efficacy variable was pain reduction (VAS) at day 28. Secondary objectives included summed pain intensity differences (SPID), overall treatment efficacy and tolerability. RESULTS: mean reduction in VAS pain score at day 28 was greater in both BMV medicated plaster groups, -39.35±27.69 mm for BMV12-h and -36.91±32.50 mm for BMV24-h, than with placebo, -20.20±27.32 mm. Considering the adjusted mean decreases, there was a statistically significant difference between BMV12-h and placebo (p=0.0110). Global pain relief (SPID) and overall treatment efficacy were significantly better with BMV. BMV and placebo plasters had similar local tolerability and there were few treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: BMV plaster was significantly more effective than placebo at reducing pain in patients with chronic elbow tendinopathies. The BMV plaster was safe and well tolerated.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a topical plaster containing diclofenac epolamine (DHEP) 1.3% in the treatment of patients with acute minor soft tissue injuries in China. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study had balanced random assignment to DHEP medicated plaster and placebo plaster. A total of 384 patients, aged 18-74 years, with minor soft tissue injury occurring within 72 hours of study entry were enrolled and randomized. Plasters were applied twice daily for seven consecutive days. Outcomes were assessed in three visits over 7 days, in addition to patients' daily self-assessment and an adverse events follow-up visit on day 21. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in pain on movement on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after 7 days of treatment. Secondary efficacy endpoints included pain on movement day-by-day evaluation, summed pain intensity difference, overall treatment efficacy, rescue medication consumption, and treatment tolerability. RESULTS: Reduction in pain on movement after 7 days of treatment, the primary efficacy endpoint, was statistically significantly greater in the DHEP plaster group than with placebo (reduction in VAS pain scores -53.78 ± 16.96 vs -37.02 ± 18.30 for DHEP vs placebo, p < 0.0001). The greater analgesic effect of DHEP plaster was evident by day 1 and increased progressively throughout the treatment period. Global pain relief and overall treatment efficacy were significantly better with DHEP. Both DHEP and placebo plaster were well tolerated with few adverse events, mostly application site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: A medicated plaster containing DHEP applied to the affected site in Chinese patients with minor soft tissue injury, such as sprains, strains and contusions, was significantly more effective than placebo at reducing pain scores. Onset of action was rapid and the DHEP plaster was safe and well tolerated. The main limitation was the use of a subjective, though validated, self-reported VAS to assess the primary endpoint.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/análogos & derivados , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Diclofenaco/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Heridas y LesionesRESUMEN
AIM: Muscle injuries and extensive exercise are associated with cyclo-oxygenase dependent formation of inflammatory prostaglandins. Since the effect of topical administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on local cyclo-oxygenase is unknown, the present exploratory, open label, non-randomized study set out to measure exercise induced release of prostaglandins before and after epicutaneous administration of diclofenac. METHODS: Microdialysis was used to determine the local interstitial concentration of PGE2 and 8-iso-PGF2α as well as diclofenac concentrations in the vastus lateralis under rest, dynamic exercise and during recovery in 12 healthy subjects at baseline and after a treatment phase applying a total of seven plasters medicated with 180 mg of diclofenac epolamine over 4 days. RESULTS: At baseline PGE2 concentrations were 1169 ± 780 pg ml(-1) at rest and 1287 ± 459 pg ml(-1) during dynamic exercise and increased to 2005 ± 1126 pg ml(-1) during recovery. After treatment average PGE2 concentrations were 997 ± 588 pg ml(-1) at rest and 1339 ± 892 pg ml(-1) during exercise. In contrast with the baseline phase no increase in PGE2 concentrations was recorded during the recovery period after treatment (PGE2 1134 ± 874 pg ml(-1)). 8-iso-PGF2α was neither affected by exercise nor by treatment with diclofenac. Local and systemic concentrations of diclofenac were highly variable but comparable with previous clinical pharmacokinetic studies. CONCLUSIONS: We can hypothesize an effect of topical diclofenac epolamine plaster on limiting the increase of local concentrations of the pro-inflammatory prostaglandin PGE2 induced in the muscle of healthy human subjects following standardized physical exercise. No effect of diclofenac treatment on 8-iso-PGF2α concentrations was observed, mainly since isoprostane is produced by a free radical-catalyzed lipid peroxidation mechanism independent of cyclo-oxygenases.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Diclofenaco/análogos & derivados , Dinoprost/análogos & derivados , Dinoprostona/análisis , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Músculo Cuádriceps/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacocinética , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Diclofenaco/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/farmacocinética , Diclofenaco/farmacología , Dinoprost/análisis , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Microdiálisis , Músculo Cuádriceps/metabolismo , Músculo Cuádriceps/fisiología , Parche Transdérmico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate if the 180-mg diclofenac epolamine and heparin sodium 5600 IU medicated plaster (DHEP-heparin) is more effective for pain reduction in mild-to-moderate contusions than the reference diclofenac epolamine 180 mg plaster (DHEP). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter, multinational, prospective, double-blind versus reference comparator and versus placebo, controlled trial had balanced random assignment in three parallel treatment groups. The DHEP-heparin medicated plaster was compared to the DHEP medicated plaster and a placebo medicated plaster. A total of 331 outpatients, aged ≥18 and ≤65 years, with unilateral mild-to-moderate muscle contusion, pain on standardized movement of ≥50 mm, and superficial hematoma of ≤10 × 14 cm(2) completed the study. Plasters were applied each morning, for ≥20 hours daily for 14 consecutive days. Outcomes were assessed in three visits, over 14 days, plus patients' daily self-assessment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: 05DCz/FHp11 - Eudra CT n: 2005-003829-31 MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline in pain on movement after 3 days of treatment, compared between groups. Secondary efficacy endpoints included mean daily change from baseline in pain on movement during treatment, pain level as assessed at control visits after 7 and 14 days, time (days) to hematoma disappearance based on patients' daily evaluations, rescue medication use, and overall treatment efficacy as judged by both patients and investigators. RESULTS: Pain progressively declined in all groups, more rapidly in DHEP-heparin recipients, compared to DHEP, and in both active treatment groups compared to placebo. Adverse events were recorded in 24 of the 355 (6.7%) exposed patients, and generally resolved without need to interrupt treatment. CONCLUSION: The DHEP-heparin plaster is superior to the reference DHEP plaster in reducing pain associated with mild-to-moderate muscle contusion. Both active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo, and each showed a comparably favorable, placebo-like safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Contusiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Diclofenaco/análogos & derivados , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Heparina/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Musculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Antifibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Moldes Quirúrgicos , Contusiones/complicaciones , Diclofenaco/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculares/complicaciones , Dolor/etiología , Placebos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability profile of diclofenac epolamine topical patch 1.3% (DETP) during short-term treatment in patients with mild-to-moderate pain. DESIGN: Fourteen clinical trials of DETP were examined; 10 placebo-controlled studies were further integrated for analyses. All adverse event (AE) data were coded to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of GI AEs was summarized by treatment, preferred term, sex, and age group. RESULTS: The percentage of patients reporting GI AEs were similar between patients treated with the DETP and placebo, with only 3 of the 10 placebo-controlled trials reporting events in >2% of patients; there was no significant difference between DETP and placebo for any preferred GI term. The most common GI AE reported for both treatment groups was nausea (1.5% DETP, 1.1% placebo). There was no significant difference between treatment groups and sex in the number of reported events and no noted difference between age groups. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that DETP is a topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is a well-tolerated treatment option, demonstrating a low incidence of GI AEs across 14 clinical trials, making it a possible alternative to short-term oral NSAIDs, which are commonly associated with GI complications.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Diclofenaco/análogos & derivados , Tracto Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores Sexuales , Parche TransdérmicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are a versatile option for the treatment of mild-to-moderate psoriasis due to their availability in a wide range of potencies and formulations. Occlusion of the corticosteroid is a widely accepted procedure to enhance the penetration of the medication, thereby improving its effectiveness. Betamethasone valerate (BMV) is a moderately potent corticosteroid that is available as a cream, ointment, and lotion. A ready-to-use occlusive dressing, which provides a continuous sustained release of BMV, has been developed for the treatment of psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new BMV 0.1% plaster compared with a BMV 0.1% cream in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, multicenter, phase III study. Eligible outpatients (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of stable, chronic plaque psoriasis vulgaris with two to four plaques on extensor surfaces of limbs were randomized to receive BMV 0.1% plaster or BMV 0.1% cream for 3-5 weeks; patients with resolution of target plaques then entered a 3-month, treatment-free, follow-up period. The number of patients showing clearing of plaques (remission) at 3 weeks (primary endpoint) and at 5 weeks was independently evaluated from digitized images of target plaques by two blinded assessors, and also assessed by the investigator and patient. Additional endpoints were (i) change from baseline in target plaque size and in Psoriasis Global Assessment (PGA) score, as evaluated by the blinded assessors, investigator, and patient; (ii) change from baseline in symptom (itching, soreness) severity; (iii) treatment satisfaction and ease of use; (iv) clearing and relapse during the follow-up period; and (v) adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Patients (n = 231) were screened and randomized to treatment with BMV 0.1% plaster (n = 116) and BMV 0.1% cream (n = 115). Significantly more patients achieved clearing after 3 weeks' treatment with BMV plaster than with BMV cream (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, p < 0.001); this difference was maintained at 5 weeks. The total plaque area decreased to a larger extent for the BMV plaster group compared with the BMV cream group (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA] model, p = 0.017 at week 5). PGA scores were significantly lower after 3 and 5 weeks' treatment with BMV plaster (ANCOVA model, all p ≤ 0.016 vs BMV cream). Both treatments reduced itching and soreness to a similar degree, and the incidences of relapse during the follow-up period were comparable between treatment groups. There were no significant differences in AEs between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: BMV 0.1% plaster is more efficacious than BMV 0.1% cream in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic plaque psoriasis in a clinical setting resembling daily clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Valerato de Betametasona/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Apósitos Oclusivos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , Valerato de Betametasona/administración & dosificación , Valerato de Betametasona/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Psoriasis/patología , Recurrencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In general sports, ankle sprain is the most frequently reported ankle injury and can cause chronic lateral ankle pain and tenderness. Treatment with NSAIDs is preferred, and several topical NSAID formulations are now available, helping to avoid the systemic adverse events typically associated with oral preparations. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a newly developed fixed-dose diclofenac epolamine (diclofenac hydroxyethylpyrrolidine, DHEP)/heparin plaster (Flectoparin® Tissugel) with that of a DHEP (Flector EP Tissugel®) or placebo plaster in the treatment of mild to moderate ankle sprain in adults. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase III study conducted in the emergency medical centres of hospitals or private clinics in Europe. Outpatients aged 18-65 years who had suffered an acute ankle sprain (O'Donoghue grade I or II in severity, with external lateral ligament involvement) within the previous 48 hours and had peri-malleolar oedema were eligible for inclusion. A total of 430 patients were randomized to receive a DHEP/heparin 1.3%/5600 IU (n = 142), DHEP 1.3% (n = 146) or placebo (n = 142) plaster, applied once daily to the injured ankle for a total of 7 days. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in pain on movement on day 3, as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The DHEP/heparin plaster was associated with a significantly (p = 0.002) greater mean reduction from baseline in pain on movement after 3 days of treatment than the DHEP plaster (-24.2 vs -18.8 mm VAS), with each active treatment providing significantly (p ≤ 0.005) greater pain relief than placebo (-13.7 mm VAS). Both DHEP/heparin and DHEP were also effective in relieving other measures of pain, with DHEP/heparin recipients experiencing significantly less daily pain while leaning on the injured limb than DHEP recipients (p < 0.001). In addition, oedema was reduced to a significantly greater extent with DHEP/heparin than with placebo (day 7 only; p = 0.012). The DHEP/heparin plaster and DHEP plaster were both well tolerated, with adverse event profiles similar to that of placebo. Local adverse events were infrequent and generally mild in severity and there were no systemic adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The fixed-dose DHEP/heparin plaster is effective and has advantages over the DHEP plaster in relieving pain, and possibly also swelling, associated with mild to moderate acute ankle sprains with oedema in adults.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/análogos & derivados , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Esguinces y Distensiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Diclofenaco/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Edema/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Parche TransdérmicoRESUMEN
This review focuses on previously unpublished clinical and pharmacokinetic data with the diclofenac epolamine (diclofenac hydroxyethylpyrrolidine) patch supporting the hypothesis of a topical effect of this formulation. Previous studies have shown that 1 or 2 weeks of treatment with diclofenac epolamine provides pain relief for various localized musculoskeletal conditions such as ankle sprains, epicondylitis and knee osteoarthritis. The reduction in pain after application of the first patch in 155 patients with painful knee osteoarthritis was significant at the 1-hour time point and was superior to placebo at the 3-hour time point and at all time points thereafter. Comparable results were found in a study of 274 patients with acute ankle sprains, in which pain relief was also significantly superior to placebo at the 3-hour time point. Corresponding single-dose (patch) application for 12 hours in ten healthy volunteers demonstrated that diclofenac first appears in plasma at a mean of 4.5 hours after application (range 2-8 hours). Hence, the patch provided pain relief at a time point at which no diclofenac is assumed to be in plasma, which demonstrates local action in terms of tissue diclofenac accumulation under the patch. This is further supported by an apparent plasma diclofenac half-life of 9-12 hours after patch application, which implies the presence of a tissue reservoir, as the half-life after oral intake of diclofenac is 1-2 hours.Steady-state plasma diclofenac concentrations are present before 3 days' application (two patches/day) and are in the order of 1-3 ng/mL. The bioavailability in terms of systemic exposure from the patch compared with oral intake (75 mg/day) is in the order of 1%. Such low diclofenac concentrations are without systemic effects, as demonstrated by the fact that no drug-related gastrointestinal bleeding, ulcers or cutaneous events characteristic of Steven-Johnson syndrome have been reported during 15 years of diclofenac epolamine patch use.These data provide support for the notion that diclofenac epolamine patch provides pain relief through accumulation of diclofenac under the site of application, without any evidence of systemic effects.