RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to record the overall perception of healthcare professionals on child abuse and identify potential affecting factors in a nationwide scale in Greece as well as to provide information that might be useful for future educational actions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,185 healthcare professionals in 60 hospitals with pediatric departments across Greece participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants included pediatricians, pediatric surgeons, residents, nurses, psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers. Sections under investigation involved experience and training in child abuse, knowledge of formal and judicial issues, clinical knowledge, and self-assessment. RESULTS: Although more than half of the participants had confronted child abuse (n=712, 60.08%), only 273 (38.34% of them) submitted reports. One third of participants reported that they had received some training (n=440, 37.13%), mainly of postgraduate nature and based on personal initiative. Of those who reported child abuse, 175 (64.10%) had been trained. Each professional category was aware of topics regarding its own interest, without adequate knowledge of other disciplines. One third of psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers felt confident in discussing with children and parents. Relevant scores were lower in the other categories. The lower scores were recorded among nurses and residents. The training deficit and reluctance to engage with judicial issues were the main causes of avoidance to deal with child abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Focused and organized training in child abuse is crucial to create reliable professionals in the field. The internet is a considerably helpful tool. Professionalism must characterize knowledge and practice in child abuse at the same level as in other medical topics. Motivation to engage should be early inspired and developed during the graduate years.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare associated infections affect both patients and employees, in terms of morbidity, mortality, and financial costs. Routine hand hygiene is the most important factor against this pestilence. Hand hygiene knowledge and compliance of healthcare workers are considered poor worldwide. Herein, we aimed to measure knowledge and compliance with hand hygiene of the healthcare workers at a university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The "WHO hand hygiene knowledge questionnaire for healthcare workers" was translated in the Greek language, and was validated linguistically, culturally, and psychometrically. Reliability, content, construct, and convergent validity were measured. A survey on hand hygiene knowledge, and compliance, based on this questionnaire, was conducted on 439 employees. RESULTS: The translated questionnaire presented good reliability, with Guttman's Lambda-6 evaluation (0.7). Content Validity Ratio was 84.6%. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis showed moderate construct validity. Convergent validity showed low correlation between the questionnaire items. Regarding the answers received, it was found that only 55.3% of the respondents received formal training on hand hygiene during the last three years prior to the study. Furthermore, 74.0% of them used alcohol-based solutions routinely. Only 54.3% of the participants presented an acceptable level of hand hygiene knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: The translation and validation of the WHO questionnaire resulted in an acceptable, reliable, and valid instrument. The survey showed that hand hygiene is rather a matter of habit, than of knowledge, and that there is great need of more organized training.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Ticks are blood feeding external parasites which can cause local and systemic complications to human body. A lot of tick-borne human diseases include Lyme disease and virus encephalitis, can be transmitted by a tick bite. Also secondary bacterial skin infection, reactive manifestations against tick allergens, and granuloma's formation can be occurred. Tick paralysis is a relatively rare complication but it can be fatal. Except the general rules for tick bite prevention, any tick found should be immediately and completely removed alive. Furthermore, the tick removal technique should not allow or provoke the escape of infective body fluids through the tick into the wound site, and disclose any local complication. Many methods of tick removal (a lot of them are unsatisfactory and/or dangerous) have been reported in the literature, but there is very limited experimental evidence to support these methods. No technique will remove completely every tick. So, there is not an appropriate and absolutely effective and/or safe tick removal technique. Regardless of the used tick removal technique, clinicians should be aware of the clinical signs of tick-transmitted diseases, the public should be informed about the risks and the prevention of tick borne diseases, and persons who have undergone tick removal should be monitored up to 30 days for signs and symptoms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We report a case of an isolated double gastric rupture, resulted from blunt abdominal trauma, that we successfully repaired by primary closure. A 18-month-old girl injured in a motor vehicle accident was admitted to our hospital where the plain X-ray and the CT findings revealed the presence of free abdominal air. An immediate performed exploratory laparotomy disclosed two full-thickness ruptures of the stomach (on the greater curvature and the posterior wall). The ruptures were closed primarily by a two-layer closure. Twenty-four hours post-operatively the patient developed delayed shock as a result of chemical peritonitis. On the 8th postoperative day the girl developed septic shock and gastrorrhagia. She underwent a gastroscopy which revealed stress-ulcer, and was treated conservatively in the children intensive care unit of our hospital. She was discharged home on 20th postoperative day. At 3-month follow up, she was doing well with normal growth and eating a regular regimen about her age. Gastric rupture following blunt abdominal trauma is rare, with a reported incidence of 0.02-1.7%. The morbidity and mortality are directly related to the number of associated injuries, the delay in diagnosis and the development of intraabdominal sepsis. In this paper we emphasise the need for early diagnosis and the aggressive surgical treatment as a key to decreasing the mortality and morbidity from this relatively rare injury, especially in this age group of children.