RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are significant physiologic differences between spinal and epidural anesthesia. Consequently, these two types of regional anesthesia may influence thermoregulatory processing differently. Accordingly, in volunteers and in patients, we tested the null hypothesis that the core-temperature thresholds triggering thermoregulatory sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering are similar during epidural and spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Six male volunteers participated on three consecutive study days: epidural or spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned on the 1st and 3rd days (approximately T10 level); no anesthesia was given on the 2nd day. On each day, the volunteers were initially warmed until they started to sweat, and subsequently cooled by central venous infusion of cold fluid until they shivered. Mean skin temperature was kept constant near 36 degrees C throughout each study. The tympanic membrane temperatures triggering a sweating rate of 40 g.m-2.h-1, a finger flow less than 0.1 ml/min, and a marked and sustained increase in oxygen consumption (approximately 30%) were considered the thermoregulatory thresholds for sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering, respectively. Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive epidural (n = 10) or spinal (n = 11) anesthesia for knee and calf surgery (approximately T10 level). As in the volunteers, the shivering threshold was defined as the tympanic membrane temperature triggering a sustained increase in oxygen consumption. RESULTS: The thresholds and ranges were similar during epidural and spinal anesthesia in the volunteers. However, the sweating-to-vasoconstriction (inter-threshold) range, the vasoconstriction-to-shivering range, and the sweating-to-shivering range all were significantly increased by regional anesthesia. The shivering thresholds in patients assigned to epidural and spinal anesthesia were virtually identical. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds during epidural and spinal anesthesia suggest that thermoregulatory processing is similar during each type of regional anesthesia. However, thermoregulatory control was impaired during regional anesthesia, as indicated by the significantly enlarged inter-threshold and sweating-to-shivering ranges.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural , Anestesia Raquidea , Regulación de la Temperatura Corporal , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/farmacología , Regulación de la Temperatura Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Procaína/análogos & derivados , Procaína/farmacología , Valores de Referencia , Tiritona , Sudoración , VasoconstricciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stenotic processes of the tracheobronchial system may lead to dyspnoea that can become lift-threatening. To restore sufficient function of the blocked airway, a silicone stent can be inserted. The anaesthesia techniques used for this intervention so far have been complicated. The object of this study was to determine whether the super-imposed high-frequency jet ventilation (SHFJV) via the jet laryngoscope originally designed for microlaryngeal surgery can be utilized for endoluminal stent insertion. METHODS: In 12 patients with acute respiratory insufficiency (ASA 3-5) due to stenosis of the tracheobronchial system, an endoluminal silicone stent was inserted through the jet laryngoscope while the patient was ventilated using SHFJV: RESULTS: A significant rise in paO2 readings prior to the jet ventilation and subsequent measurements was observed. The CO2 elimination was good (average paCO2 31.5 +/- 7.5-53.1 +/- 14 mmHg). Variably high paCO2 readings during stent insertion were related to the respective surgical phases. At the end of the surgical manipulation, all patients had sufficient spontaneous ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: First clinical applications of the jet laryngoscope combined with superimposed jet ventilation for stent insertion demonstrated satisfactory results. Not only were the patients ventilated throughout the procedure, but CO2 elimination was also satisfactory. Superimposed jet ventilation provides a sufficient tidal volume with low ventilation pressures, and therefore oxygenation and CO2 elimination are unproblematic. SHFJV enables the anaesthetist to ventilate the patient nearly continuously with minimal phases of apnoea. The only apnoea phases, as with any other method, occur during surgical manipulation while inserting the stent and thus blocking the airway. We believe that the jet laryngoscope with SHFJV presents a distinct advantage for both anaesthetist and surgeon when inserting stents in the tracheobronchial system.