RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (PSHF) are most common elbow fractures among children and adolescents. While there is substantial agreement on treating type 1 and type 3 fractures (conservatively and surgically, respectively), the debate on optimal treatment of Gartland type 2 fractures is still open.We wanted to review our cases, analyzing outcomes and seeking for parameters that could help surgeons treating these injuries. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients treated with reduction and casting (group A) and matched to 38 patients treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pining (CRPP, group B) for Gartland type 2 fractures between 2009 and 2013. At a mean follow-up of more than 6 years patients were analyzed by an accurate clinical exam and evaluation scales. Radiographic parameters at time of cast or pins removal were studied too. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical exam and evaluation scales between groups. Two patients in group A developed a cubitus varus deformity and one patient in group B had a superficial pin-tract infection. Baumann angle (BA) was out of normal range in two cases of conservative group and anterior humeral line (AHL) bisected capitellum in 42.1% of patients in group A and 73.2% in group B (pâ¯<â¯.05). CONCLUSION: It is reasonable to expect satisfactory outcomes both after conservative and surgical treatment of type 2 fractures, if cornerstones of both treatments are applied. Parameters that should be focused are probably two: complications (2 cases of cubitus varus in group A versus one superificial pin-tract infections in group B) and the better trend in surgical group in regards to loss of flexion and hyperextension of the affected elbow, likely related to the other notable datum, that is the percentage of cases in which AHL bisects capitellum. We think that, in absence of vascolonervous lesions and important swelling, BA and AHL are the most important parameters that can help us choosing the optimal treatment, as clarified in the algorithm we developed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - retrospective comparative study.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in the use of artificial turf surfaces in rugby. In particular, artificial surfaces may be an useful means of increasing participation in the sport by allowing greater usage of a given pitch, especially in regions where natural turf pitches are difficult to maintain. METHODS: The incidence of site, nature, cause, and severity of training and match injuries was prospectively recorded in two professional teams (one equipped with World Rugby certified third generation artificial turf and the other with natural grass over the 2014-2015 season). RESULTS: A total of 23,840 minutes of exposure was displayed for the whole sample, 1,440 minutes during matches and 22,400 during training sessions. We recorded 37 (48%) traumatic injuries and 39 (52%) overuse injuries. For traumatic injuries, we did not find significant differences in the overall risk injury between grass and artificial turf considering match exposure and training sessions. For overuse injuries, there were significant differences in the overall risk injury between grass and artificial turf considering match exposure (p=0.03) and training sessions (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: In elite Italian rugby players, artificial turf seems to be safe in regards to traumatic injury while it seems to be a risk factor for overuse injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation remains controversial, and the debate about whether patients should be conservatively or surgically treated continues. This study aims to compare conservative and surgical treatment of acute type III ACJ injuries in active sport participants (<35 years of age) by analysing clinical and radiological results after a minimum of 24 months follow-up. METHODS: The records of 72 patients with acute type III ACJ dislocations who were treated from January 2006 to December 2011 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were categorised into two groups. group A included 25 patients treated conservatively, and group B included 30 patients treated surgically with the TightRope™ system. Seventeen patients were lost to follow-up. All patients were evaluated at final follow-up with these clinical scores: Constant, University of California Los Angeles scale (UCLA), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scale (ASES) and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) and with a subjective evaluation of the patient satisfaction, aesthetic results and shoulder function. The distance between the acromion and clavicle and between the coracoid process and clavicle were evaluated radiographically and compared with preoperative values. Δ, the difference in mm between the distance at the final follow-up and at T0 in the injured shoulder, and α, the side-to-side difference in mm at follow-up, were calculated. Heterotopic ossification and postoperative osteolysis were evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: There were no major intraoperative complications in the surgical group. The subjective parameters significantly differed between the two groups. Constant, ASES and UCLA scores were similar in both groups (P > 0.05), whereas ACJI results favoured the surgical group (group A, 72.4; group B, 87.9; P < 0.05). All measurements of radiographic evaluation were significantly reduced in the surgical group compared with the conservative group. In group A, we detected calcifications in 30% of patients; in group B we detected two cases of moderate osteolysis and calcifications in 70% of patients. CONCLUSION: Although better subjective and radiographic results were achieved in surgically treated patients, traditional objective scores did not show significant differences between the two groups. Our results cannot support routine use of surgery to treat type III ACJ dislocations.