RESUMEN
A growing body of evidence links certain aspects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) pharmacology with acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), a small family of excitatory neurotransmitter receptors implicated in pain and neuroinflammation. The molecular basis of NSAID inhibition of ASICs has remained unknown, hindering the exploration of this line of therapy. Here, we characterized the mechanism of inhibition, explored the molecular determinants of sensitivity, and sought to establish informative structure-activity relationships, using electrophysiology, site-directed mutagenesis, and voltage-clamp fluorometry. Our results show that ibuprofen is an allosteric inhibitor of ASIC1a, which binds to a crucial site in the agonist transduction pathway and causes conformational changes that oppose channel activation. Ibuprofen inhibits several ASIC subtypes, but certain ibuprofen derivatives show some selectivity for ASIC1a over ASIC2a and vice versa. These results thus define the NSAID/ASIC interaction and pave the way for small-molecule drug design targeting pain and inflammation.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueadores del Canal Iónico Sensible al Ácido/química , Bloqueadores del Canal Iónico Sensible al Ácido/farmacología , Canales Iónicos Sensibles al Ácido/química , Canales Iónicos Sensibles al Ácido/efectos de los fármacos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Ibuprofeno/farmacología , Regulación Alostérica , Animales , Sitios de Unión , Embrión de Pollo , Modelos Moleculares , Conformación Proteica , Ratas , Relación Estructura-Actividad , Xenopus laevisRESUMEN
AIMS: Whether skeletal myoblast (SM) implants are proarrhythmic is still controversial due to conflicting pre-clinical and clinical data. We hypothesized that if SM implants are arrhythmogenic, they will facilitate the induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias by promoting heterogeneous propagation of activation wavefronts. METHODS: Skeletal myoblast cells were harvested from 10 pigs. A month later, 125 ± 37 × 10(6) cells were subepicardially injected in an area of â¼2 cm(2) at the anterolateral aspect of the left ventricle. Four weeks later, a ventricular stimulation protocol was conducted. Once explanted, epicardial wavefronts over SM and adjacent control areas were optically mapped. Eight saline-injected animals were used as controls. To compare with clear arrhythmogenic substrates, propagation patterns were also evaluated in infarcted hearts and on a SM-implanted heart following amiodarone infusion. RESULTS: In SM hearts, fibrosis and differentiated SM cells were consistently found and no tachyarrhythmias were induced. Wavefronts propagated homogeneously over SM and adjacent areas, with no late activation zones, as opposed to the infarcted hearts. The time required for the wavefronts to depolarize both areas were similar, becoming only slightly longer at SM areas after an extra-stimulus (P = 0.025). Conduction velocities and APD(90) were also similar. Saline hearts showed similar results. The extent of the conduction delay was not related to the number of injected SM cells. CONCLUSION: In normal swine hearts, myoblast implants promote localized fibrosis and slightly retard epicardial wavefront propagation only after extra-stimuli. However, SM implants are not associated with local re-entry and do not facilitate ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the whole normal heart.