RESUMEN
The vascularized fibula transfer is a well-established technique for extremity reconstruction, but operative planning and patient selection remains crucial. Although recently developed techniques for bone reconstruction, such as bone segment transfer, are becoming increasingly popular, bone defects may still require vascularized bone grafts under certain circumstances. In this study, 41 cases, 28 (68%) men and 13 (32%) women (median age: 40 years), were retrospectively analyzed. Therapy-specific data (flap vascularity [free vs. pedicled] size in cm and configuration [single- vs. double-barrel], mode of fixation [internal/external]) and potential risk factors were ascertained. Indications for reconstruction were osteomyelitis at host site (n = 23, 55%), pseudarthrosis (n = 8, 20%), congenital deformity (n = 6, 15%), traumatic defect, and giant cell tumor of the bone (n = 2, 5% each). Complete healing occurred in 34 (83%) patients after a median time of 6 months. Confounders for prolonged healing were female gender (p = 0.002), reconstruction in the lower limb (p = 0.011), smoking (p = 0.049), and the use of an external fixator (p = 0.009). Six (15%) patients required secondary limb amputation due to reconstruction failure, and one patient had persistent pseudarthrosis at last follow-up. The only risk factor for amputation assessed via logistic regression analysis was preexisting PAOD (peripheral artery occlusive disease; p = 0.008) The free fibula is a reliable tool for extremity reconstruction in various cases, but time to full osseous integration may exceed six months. Patients should be encouraged to cease smoking as it is a modifiable risk factor.
RESUMEN
Microsurgical training courses are an integral part of surgical education and training. Due to the changes in the surgical everyday routine, the competence and skills training outside the operating room has an increasingly important status. Multi-day, hands-on exercises with different models of increasing difficulty use artificial, avital and vital microsurgical models. The skills are evaluated with regard to fine motor skills as well as orientation in space and low-tremor motion sequences as well as bimanual manipulation exercises by means of "lobal rating scales". However, with numerous course offerings in German-speaking countries, there are no uniform and transparent contents and evaluation standards to reflect the quality of the courses. At a consensus meeting, minimum requirements for the contents of microsurgical training courses in the context of continuing medical education were defined and drafted as a German-language consensus in order to award a DAM quality seal. The parameters include the definition of targets, the existence of a scripts, the number of hours used, models used, practical exercise time on the microscope, trainer to participant ratio, types of anastomosis or coaptation (artery, vein, nerve, lymph vessel), application of a global rating scale , examination (grade/passed - failed), participant certificate and course evaluation. With the aim to meet the available courses/course concepts to maintain or improve the quality of education and training, the assignment of a "Basic" and an "Advanced" quality seal has been defined. The further stepwise development of the courses is necessary to sustain all skills and competencies for future microsurgeons. Integration of validated microsurgical simulators may reduce animal use and thus contribute to the ethical responsibility. The introduction of quality seals for microsurgical training courses should strengthen the transparency and commitment of participants and provide support to course providers with appropriately substantiated content through DAM.