Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Phys ; 50 Suppl 1: 91-94, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36779658

RESUMEN

The author reminisces about some of his experiences working with Monte Carlo techniques for Medical Physics applications.


Asunto(s)
Física , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Método de Montecarlo , Radiometría/métodos
4.
Med Phys ; 41(4): 041501, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24694120

RESUMEN

An addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for the determination of absorbed dose to water in megavoltage photon beams is presented. This addendum continues the procedure laid out in TG-51 but new kQ data for photon beams, based on Monte Carlo simulations, are presented and recommendations are given to improve the accuracy and consistency of the protocol's implementation. The components of the uncertainty budget in determining absorbed dose to water at the reference point are introduced and the magnitude of each component discussed. Finally, the consistency of experimental determination of ND,w coefficients is discussed. It is expected that the implementation of this addendum will be straightforward, assuming that the user is already familiar with TG-51. The changes introduced by this report are generally minor, although new recommendations could result in procedural changes for individual users. It is expected that the effort on the medical physicist's part to implement this addendum will not be significant and could be done as part of the annual linac calibration.


Asunto(s)
Fotones/uso terapéutico , Radiometría/normas , Sociedades Científicas , Calibración , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Incertidumbre
6.
Med Phys ; 37(2): 461-5, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20229854

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Plane-parallel chambers are recommended by dosimetry protocols for measurements in (especially low-energy) electron beams. In dosimetry protocols, the replacement correction factor P(repl) is assumed unity for "well-guarded" plane-parallel chambers in electron beams when the front face of the cavity is the effective point of measurement. There is experimental evidence that ion chambers which are not well-guarded (e.g., Markus) have nonunity P(repl) values. Monte Carlo simulations are employed in this study to investigate the replacement correction factors for plane-parallel chambers in electron beams. METHODS: Using previously established Monte Carlo calculation methods, the values of P(repl) are calculated with high statistical precision for the cavities of a variety of plane-parallel chambers in a water phantom irradiated by various electron beams. The dependences of the values of P(repl) on the beam quality, phantom depth, as well as the guard ring width are studied. RESULTS: In the dose fall-off region for low-energy beams, the P(repl) values are very sensitive to depth. It is found that this is mainly due to the gradient effect, which originates from the fact that the effective point of measurement for many plane-parallel chambers should not be at the front face of the cavity but rather shifted toward the center of the cavity by a fraction of a millimeter. Using the front face of the cavity as the effective point of measurement, the calculated values of P(repl) at d(ref) are not unity for some well-guarded plane-parallel chambers. The calculated P(repl) values for the Roos chamber are close to 1 for all electron beams. The calculation results for the Markus chamber are in good agreement with the measured values. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate selection of the effective point of measurement for plane-parallel chambers in electron beams is an important issue. If the effective point of measurement is correctly accounted for, the P(repl) values would be almost independent of depth. Both the guard ring width and the ratio of the collecting volume diameter to the cavity thickness can influence the values of P(repl) For a diameter to thickness ratio of 5 (e.g., NACP02 chamber), the guard width has to be 6 mm for the chamber to be considered as well-guarded, i.e., have a P(repl) value of 1.00.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Radiometría/instrumentación , Diseño Asistido por Computadora , Electrones , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
Med Phys ; 34(5): 1734-42, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17555255

RESUMEN

Silicon semiconductor diodes measure almost the same depth-dose distributions in both photon and electron beams as those measured by ion chambers. A recent study in ion chamber dosimetry has suggested that the wall correction factor for a parallel-plate ion chamber in electron beams changes with depth by as much as 6%. To investigate diode detector response with respect to depth, a silicon diode model is constructed and the water/silicon dose ratio at various depths in electron beams is calculated using EGSnrc. The results indicate that, for this particular diode model, the diode response per unit water dose (or water/diode dose ratio) in both 6 and 18 MeV electron beams is flat within 2% versus depth, from near the phantom surface to the depth of R50 (with calculation uncertainty <0.3%). This suggests that there must be some other correction factors for ion chambers that counter-balance the large wall correction factor at depth in electron beams. In addition, the beam quality and field-size dependence of the diode model are also calculated. The results show that the water/diode dose ratio remains constant within 2% over the electron energy range from 6 to 18 MeV. The water/diode dose ratio does not depend on field size as long as the incident electron beam is broad and the electron energy is high. However, for a very small beam size (1 X 1 cm(2)) and low electron energy (6 MeV), the water/diode dose ratio may decrease by more than 2% compared to that of a broad beam.


Asunto(s)
Electrones , Modelos Teóricos , Método de Montecarlo , Silicio/química , Agua/química , Dosis de Radiación , Semiconductores
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA