RESUMEN
Forest management pathways for nature-based climate solutions, such as variable retention harvesting (VRH), have been gaining traction in recent years; however, their net biochemical and biophysical impacts remain unknown. Here, we use a combination of close-range and satellite remote sensing, eddy covariance technique, and ground-based biometric measurements to investigate forest thinning density and aggregation that maintain ecosystem nutrients, enhance tree growth and provide a negative feedback to the local climate in a northern temperate coniferous forest stand in Ontario, Canada. Our results showed that soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in VRH plots were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for all VRH treatments compared to unharvested plots. On average, soil C was reduced by -0.64 ± 0.22 Δ% C and N by -0.023 ± 0.008 Δ% N in VRH plots. We also observed the largest loss of soil C and N in open areas of aggregate plots. Furthermore, the changes in albedo resulting from VRH treatment were equivalent to removing a large amount of C from the atmosphere, ranging from 1.3 ± 0.2 kg C yr-1 m-2 in aggregate 33 % crown retention plots to 3.4 ± 0.5 kg C yr-1 m-2 in dispersed 33 % crown retention plots. Our findings indicate that spatially dispersed VRH resulted in minimal loss of soil C and N and the highest understory growth and C uptake, while enhanced tree growth and local cooling through increased albedo were observed in dispersed VRH plots with the fewest residual trees. These findings suggest that using the harvested trees from VRH in a way that avoids releasing C into the atmosphere makes dispersed VRH the preferred forest management pathway for nature-based climate solutions.
RESUMEN
Accurate estimation of photosynthesis is crucial for ecosystem carbon cycle modelling. Previous studies have established an empirical relationship between photosynthetic capacity (maximum carboxylation rate, Vcmax; maximum electron transport rate, Jmax) and leaf chlorophyll (Chl) content to infer global photosynthetic capacity. However, the basis for the Chl-Vcmax relationship remains unclear, which is further evidenced by the temporal variations in the Chl-Vcmax relationship. Using multiple years of observations of four deciduous tree species, we found that Vcmax and Jmax acclimate to photosynthetically active radiation faster (4-8 weeks) than Chl (10-12 weeks). This mismatch in temporal scales causes seasonality in the Vcmax-Chl relationship. To account for the mismatch, we used a Chl fluorescence parameter (quantum yield of Photosystem II, Φ(II)) to tighten the relationship and found Φ(II) × Chl correlated with Vcmax and Jmax (r2 = 0.74 and 0.72 respectively) better than only Chl (r2 = 0.7 and 0.6 respectively). It indicates that Φ(II) accounts for the short-term adjustment of leaf photosynthetic capacity to light, which was not captured by Chl. Our study advances our understanding of the ecophysiological basis for the empirical Vcmax-Chl relationship and how to better infer Vcmax from Chl and fluorescence, which guides large-scale photosynthesis simulations using remote sensing.
RESUMEN
Activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate-selective ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDA receptors) requires two agonists, glutamate and glycine. These ligands are thought to bind to the NR2 and NR1 subunits, respectively, apparently ruling out the formation of functional homomeric receptors. However, NMDA-mediated currents are observed when the mammalian NR1 subunit is expressed alone in Xenopus laevis oocytes. These currents have been generally ascribed to a functional association between NR1 and the endogenous glutamate receptor subunit XenU1. To determine whether such a functional association does in fact occur, we have isolated cDNAs for both XenU1 and XenU1a, a presumed nonallelic counterpart. We investigated whether the coexpression of either XenU1 or XenU1a with NR1 in either X. laevis oocytes and human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells had any effect on the observed NMDA receptor responses. In oocytes, coinjection of XenU1 with NR1 did not increase the observed currents compared with injection of NR1 alone; similarly, in HEK 293 cells, coexpression of XenU1 and NR1 did not result in the formation of functional channels. We also found no pharmacological or biochemical evidence for interaction between the two subunits. We conclude, therefore, that XenU1 does not associate with the NR1 subunit and that an alternative explanation must be sought for the channels observed when NR1 is expressed alone in oocytes.