RESUMEN
Background/Problem. Given the treatment-resistant gait deficits after stroke and known elevated energy cost of gait after stroke, it is important to study the patterns of mechanical energies of the lower limb segments. There is a dearth of information regarding mechanical energies specifically for the thigh and shank across the gait cycle. Therefore, the purpose of the current work was to characterize the following: (1) relative patterns of oscillation kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) within lower limb segments and across lower limb segments in healthy adults during the swing phase at chosen and slow gait speeds; (2) KE and PE swing phase patterns and values for stroke survivors versus healthy adults walking at slow speed; and (3) KE and PE patterns during the swing phase for two different compensatory gait strategies after stroke,. Methods. This was a gait characterization study, a two-group, parallel-cohort study of fourteen stroke survivors with gait deficits, walking at <0.4 m/s and eight adults with no gait deficits. For testing, the eight healthy adults walked at their chosen speed, and then at the imposed slow speed of <0.04 m/s. We used a standard motion capture system and calculation methods to acquire, calculate, and characterize oscillation patterns of KE and PE of the limb segments (thigh and shank) across the gait cycle. Results. In healthy adults, we identified key energy conservation mechanisms inherent in the interactions of KE and PE, both within the thigh and shank segments and across those limb segments, partially explaining the low cost of energy of the normal adult chosen speed gait pattern, and the underlying mechanism affording the known minimal set of activated muscles during walking, especially during the early swing phase. In contrast, KE was effectively absent for both healthy adults at imposed slow walking speed and stroke survivors at their very slow chosen speed, eliminating the normal conservation of energy between KE and PE within the thigh and across the thigh and shank. Moreover, and in comparison to healthy adult slow speed, stroke survivors exhibited greater abnormalities in mechanical energies patterns, reflected in either a compensatory stepping strategy (over-flexing the hip) or circumducting strategy (stiff-legged gait, with knee extended throughout the swing phase). Conclusions and contribution to the field. Taken together, these findings support targeted training to restore normal balance control and normal activation and de-activation coordination of hip, knee, and ankle muscles, respectively (agonist/antagonist at each joint), so as to eliminate the known post-stroke abnormal co-contractions; this motor training is critical in order to release the limb to swing normally in response to mechanical energies and afford the use of conservation of KE and PE energies within the thigh and across thigh and shank.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the performance of 2 observational gait measures, the Tinetti Gait Scale (TGS) and the Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (G.A.I.T.), in identifying improvement in gait in response to gait training. DESIGN: In secondary analysis from a larger study of multimodal gait training for stroke survivors, we measured gait at pre-, mid-, and posttreatment according to G.A.I.T. and TGS, assessing their capability to capture recovery of coordinated gait components. SETTING: Large medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Cohort of stroke survivors (N=44) greater than 6 months after stroke. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects received 48 sessions of a multimodal gait-training protocol. Treatment consisted of 1.5 hours per session, 4 sessions per week for 12 weeks, receiving these 3 treatment aspects: (1) coordination exercise, (2) body weight-supported treadmill training, and (3) overground gait training, with 46% of subjects receiving functional electrical stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All subjects were evaluated with the G.A.I.T. and TGS before and after completing the 48-session intervention. An additional evaluation was performed at midtreatment (after session 24). RESULTS: For the total subject sample, there were significant pre-/post-, pre-/mid-, and mid-/posttreatment gains for both the G.A.I.T. and the TGS. According to the G.A.I.T., 40 subjects (91%) showed improved scores, 2 (4%) no change, and 2 (4%) a worsening score. According to the TGS, only 26 subjects (59%) showed improved scores, 16 (36%) no change, and 1 (2%) a worsening score. For 1 treatment group of chronic stroke survivors, the TGS failed to identify a significant treatment response to gait training, whereas the G.A.I.T. measure was successful. CONCLUSIONS: The G.A.I.T. is more sensitive than the TGS for individual patients and group treatment response in identifying recovery of volitional control of gait components in response to gait training.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/rehabilitación , Marcha/fisiología , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/etiología , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Sobrevivientes , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No single intervention restores the coordinated components of gait after stroke. OBJECTIVE: The authors tested the multimodal Gait Training Protocol, with or without functional electrical stimulation (FES), to improve volitional walking (without FES) in patients with persistent (>6 months) dyscoordinated gait. METHODS: A total of 53 subjects were stratified and randomly allocated to either FES with intramuscular (IM) electrodes (FES-IM) or No-FES. Both groups received 1.5-hour training sessions 4 times a week for 12 weeks of coordination exercises, body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT), and over-ground walking, provided with FES-IM or No-FES. The primary outcome was the Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (G.A.I.T.) of coordinated movement components, with secondary measures, including manual muscle testing, isolated leg movements (Fugl-Meyer scale), 6-Minute Walk Test, and Locomotion/Mobility subscale of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). RESULTS: No baseline differences in subject characteristics and measures were found. The G.A.I.T. showed an additive advantage with FES-IM versus No-FES (parameter statistic 1.10; P = .045, 95% CI = 0.023-2.179) at the end of training. For both FES-IM and No-FES, a within-group, pre/posttreatment gain was present for all measures (P < .05), and a continued benefit from mid- to posttreatment (P < .05) was present. For FES-IM, recovered coordinated gait persisted at 6-month follow-up but not for No-FES. CONCLUSION: Improved gait coordination and function were produced by the multimodal Gait Training Protocol. FES-IM added significant gains that were maintained for 6 months after the completion of training.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/rehabilitación , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Electrodos Implantados , Femenino , Marcha/fisiología , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/etiología , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Locomoción/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Entrenamiento de Fuerza , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Caminata/fisiologíaRESUMEN
After stroke, persistent gait deficits cause debilitating falls and poor functional mobility. Gait restoration can preclude these outcomes. Sixteen subjects (>12 months poststroke) were randomized to two gait training groups. Group 1 received 12 weeks of treatment, 4 times a week, 90 min per session, including 30 min strengthening and coordination, 30 min over-ground gait training, and 30 min weight-supported treadmill training. Group 2 received the same treatment, but also used functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) with intramuscular (IM) electrodes (FNS-IM) for each aspect of treatment. Outcome measures were kinematics of gait swing phase. Both groups showed no significant pre-/posttreatment gains in peak swing hip flexion. Group 1 (no FNS) had no significant gains in other gait components at posttreatment or at follow-up. Group 2 (FNS-IM) had significant gains in peak swing knee flexion and mid-swing ankle dorsiflexion (p < 0.05) that were maintained for 6 months.