Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Endod J ; 42(10): 893-9, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19549149

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate marginal seal, water sorption, solubility and loss of mass after brushing of several temporary filling materials. METHODOLOGY: For marginal seal, Class I cavities, including endodontic access preparations, were made in human molar teeth and restored using one or other of several temporary filling materials (n = 10): zinc oxide/calcium sulphate-based cement (Cavit, 3M,ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), zinc oxide/eugenol cement (IRM, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE, USA), glass ionomer cement (Vidrion R, SSWhite, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil) or a dimethacrylate-based filling (Bioplic, Biodinâmica, Londrina, PR, Brazil). Dye penetration was assessed after thermocycling and immersion in 0.5% basic fuchsine solution. For water sorption, solubility and loss of mass analyses, disc-shaped specimens were made. Water sorption and solubility were evaluated by mass alteration after storage in distilled water for 7 days (n = 7). Loss of mass was calculated based on the difference of mass after abrasion with a toothbrush (n = 5), and surfaces were analysed by SEM. Data of water sorption, solubility and loss of mass were submitted to anova and Tukey's test, and marginal sealing data to Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed for marginal sealing (P < 0.0001), water sorption (P < 0.01), solubility (P < 0.01) and loss of mass (P < 0.05). Bioplic had the best marginal seal. Cavit had the greatest water sorption and solubility. Vidrion R and Bioplic had the lowest solubility. Loss of mass after brushing was higher for Cavit, followed by Bioplic, IRM and Vidrion R. Cavit and Vidrion R were worn aggressively by brushing. CONCLUSIONS: The resin-based temporary filling Bioplic produced the best marginal seal, and was associated with the lowest water sorption, solubility and loss of mass.


Asunto(s)
Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Alisadura de la Restauración Dental , Restauración Dental Provisional , Materiales de Obturación del Conducto Radicular/química , Cepillado Dental/instrumentación , Agua/química , Absorción , Adsorción , Sulfato de Calcio/química , Colorantes , Preparación de la Cavidad Dental , Cementos Dentales , Filtración Dental/clasificación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo/química , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Metacrilatos/química , Metilmetacrilatos/química , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Polivinilos/química , Cementos de Resina/química , Preparación del Conducto Radicular , Colorantes de Rosanilina , Solubilidad , Propiedades de Superficie , Temperatura , Factores de Tiempo , Óxido de Zinc/química , Cemento de Óxido de Zinc-Eugenol/química
2.
J Dent ; 37(5): 331-5, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19203819

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the filler content in the cohesive strength (sigma), Weibull modulus (m) and degree of conversion (DC) of an experimental adhesive system. METHODS: A HEMA/Bis-GMA/TEGDMA-based adhesive was formulated and filled with silica nanofillers in the following weight percentages (wt%): R0=0%; R1=1%; R3=3%; R5=5% and R10=10%. The adhesive of Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP) system was used as a commercial reference. Twenty dumbbell-shaped specimens with cross-sectional area of 0.5mm(2) were made per group and tensile tested with a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min until fracture. The cohesive strength was calculated in MPa. DC was obtained through FTIR after light curing for 25s. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05) and to Weibull analysis. RESULTS: Mean sigma results were: R0=65.4+/-8.4; R1=73.2+/-8.8; R3=72.0+/-8.4; R5=73.1+/-9.7; R10=85.5+/-13.1 and SBMP=79.0+/-11.0MPa. R10 presented the highest sigma, while R0 showed the lowest. R5 and SBMP did not differ significantly (p<0.05). Weibull analysis revealed no significant difference in structural reliability between groups. The experimental adhesives presented similar results of DC, which, in turn, were significantly higher than the SBMP. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 10% filler in weight improves the cohesive strength of the adhesive, not interfering in the structural reliability or the degree of conversion.


Asunto(s)
Análisis del Estrés Dental , Cementos de Resina , Adhesividad , Bisfenol A Glicidil Metacrilato , Dureza , Curación por Luz de Adhesivos Dentales , Ensayo de Materiales , Metacrilatos , Nanocompuestos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Transición de Fase , Polietilenglicoles , Ácidos Polimetacrílicos , Cementos de Resina/química , Dióxido de Silicio , Espectroscopía Infrarroja por Transformada de Fourier , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA