RESUMEN
The thrombophlebitis of the superficial dorsal vein of the penis, called Mondor's penile disease (PMD), is a condition with a low incidence worldwide. In general, it is considered a self-limited disease that usually resolves with conservative management and very rarely requires surgical intervention. We report the case of a 41-year-old patient, who presented PMD which persists after medical treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug and low molecular weight heparin. Surgery was decided and thrombectomy plus resection of the superficial penile vein was performed with satisfactory results. A review of the literature is presented, focusing on the limited available evidence of surgical management. (AU)
La tromboflebitis de la vena dorsal superficial del pene, también llamada enfermedad de Mondor, es una condición infrecuente que generalmente es auto-limitada. Usualmente mejora con el tratamiento conservador y rara vez requiere intervención quirúrgica. Reportamos el caso de un paciente de 41 años que a pesar del uso de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos y de heparina de bajo peso molecular no tuvo resolución del cuadro clínico. Se realizó trombectomía y resección de la vena dorsal superficial del pene de manera satisfactoria. Se presenta una revisión de la literatura, enfocada en la poca evidencia disponible sobre el manejo quirúrgico en esta enfermedad. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Tromboflebitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pene/anomalías , Enfermedades del Pene , Trombectomía , Antiinflamatorios , Heparina , ColombiaRESUMEN
The thrombophlebitis of the superficial dorsal vein of the penis, called Mondor's penile disease (PMD), is a condition with a low incidence worldwide. In general, it is considered a self-limited disease that usually resolves with conservative management and very rarely requires surgical intervention. We report the case of a 41-year-old patient, who presented PMD which persists after medical treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug and low molecular weight heparin. Surgery was decided and thrombectomy plus resection of the superficial penile vein was performed with satisfactory results. A review of the literature is presented, focusing on the limited available evidence of surgical management.
Asunto(s)
Mastitis , Enfermedades del Pene , Tromboflebitis , Adulto , Femenino , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades del Pene/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Pene/cirugía , Pene/irrigación sanguínea , Pene/cirugía , Trombectomía , Tromboflebitis/diagnóstico , Tromboflebitis/cirugíaRESUMEN
En pacientes con estrechez uretral bulbar de una longitud mayor a 2 cm, que no sean candidatos a otras técnicas, se realiza uretroplastia con injerto. Actualmente se emplean diversas técnicas, cada una con ventajas y desventajas propias. Describir las ventajas y desventajas de las técnicas quirúrgicas empleadas actualmente en la uretroplastia con injerto, así como sus tasas de éxito. Se hizo una búsqueda en PubMed, ClinicalKey y en ScienceDirect, utilizando las palabras claves: "urethral stricture," "urethroplasty," "oral graft" y "flap." Se utilizaron los estudios más relevantes, tanto originales como revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis, en inglés y en español. Las diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas ofrecen ventajas y desventajas teóricas frente a las otras, aunque las tasas de éxito en todas es cercana al 90%, sin ser una francamente superior frente a las demás. La elección de la técnica quirúrgica a realizar depende de las preferencias y experiencia del cirujano, dado que la tasa de éxito para todas las técnicas es similar.
In patients with urethral stricture longer than 2 cm who are not candidates for other techniques, graft urethroplasty is the most performed surgery. Currently, several techniques are used, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical techniques currently used in graft urethroplasty, as well as their success rates. A search was made in PubMed, ClinicalKey and ScienceDirect, using the keywords: "urethral stenosis," "urethroplasty," "oral graft" and "flap." The most relevant original studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes were used, both in English and Spanish. The different surgical techniques offer theoretical advantages compared with the others, although the success rates in all are close to 90%, without being frankly superior compared with the others. The choice of the surgical technique to be performed depends on the preferences and experience of the surgeon, given that the success rate for all techniques is similar.