RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Manubriosternal dislocations are a rare entity and frequently associated with thoracic spine fractures and, in minority of cases, with cervical or thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: Our case represents a 38-year-old male who fell from a height resulting in multiple fractures, amongst others of the first lumbar vertebra. At primary survey and computed tomography scan no manubriosternal injury was apparent. After posterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar vertebrae a manubriosternal dislocation was identified and stabilized using plate-and-screw fixation. RESULTS: Clinical findings of a manubriosternal dislocation are not always obvious, allowing them to be missed at initial assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Manubriosternal dislocations can be missed at the initial investigation, even on cross-sectional imaging, and only become visible after spine stabilization because of the tight relationship between sternum and vertebrae in the thoracic cage. There is no unanimity in literature for surgical treatment of manubriosternal dislocations, although plate fixation is generally considered a safe and effective treatment option.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Luxaciones Articulares , Traumatismo Múltiple , Fusión Vertebral , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Manubrio/diagnóstico por imagen , Manubrio/cirugía , Manubrio/lesiones , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Esternón/cirugía , Esternón/lesiones , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/etiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismo Múltiple/cirugía , Traumatismo Múltiple/complicaciones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Timing of surgery in geriatric hip fracture treatment remains controversial. Early surgery is acknowledged as a quality indicator and NICE guidelines recommend surgery within 0-48 h from admission. In 2014 we implemented the indicator of early surgery in our institution, enhancing operative treatment within the next calendar day. We aimed to evaluate the implementation, define the room for improvement and provide strategies to maintain the quality indicator. METHODS: Clinical outcome of 744 patients (January 2011-December 2013) before early surgery was implemented, compared to 817 patients (June 2014-May 2017) after implementation of early surgery with a follow-up of 6 months. Data-analysis was done by Pearson's Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Early surgery was achieved in 47.6% and 85.7% in the preimplementation and postimplementation group, respectively (P < 0.001). Both 30 days and 6 months mortality were similar (6.0% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.573 and 18.7% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.355, preimplementation vs. postimplementation, respectively). Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter total length-of-stay (14 vs. 12 days, P < 0.001, preimplementation vs. postimplementation, respectively). Early surgery did not reduce the readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS: The indicator of early surgery has been successfully implemented. Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter LOS. No significant reduction in 30 days and 6 months mortality, and 90 days readmission was observed. To maintain early surgery, continuous engagement and monitoring is required by all shareholders involved and if necessary, adjustment of the clinical route is appropriate.