RESUMEN
Resumo Objetivo Comparar o grau de concordância, a correlação e a acurácia entre os instrumentos Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) e Índice de Vulnerabilidade Clínico-Funcional-20 (IVCF-20) em pessoas idosas com hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS). Método Estudo transversal e domiciliar com pessoas idosas de Montes Claros, MG. Este estudo incluiu somente indivíduos com HAS cujos dados foram coletados no período de novembro de 2016 a fevereiro de 2017. Foram determinados a sensibilidade, especificidade e valores preditivos. A estatística Kappa analisou a concordância e confiabilidade, o coeficiente de Pearson avaliou a correlação entre os instrumentos. Resultados 281 eram hipertensas e foram incluídas neste estudo. Constatou-se que a prevalência de fragilidade foi 31,3% pela EFS e 22,1% pelo IVCF-20. A estatística Kappa foi 0,604 e coeficiente de correlação de Pearson foi de 0,621 (p<0,001). A acurácia foi de 84,34%. Conclusão Os instrumentos EFS e IVCF-20 demonstraram concordância e confiabilidade moderada, forte correlação positiva e boa acurácia. Os resultados ratificam a importância de padronizar o instrumento para verificar a fragilidade de pessoas idosas hipertensas. A adequada avaliação da fragilidade busca ofertar uma assistência pautada na prevenção e promoção que capazes de evitar a piora do estado de saúde e agravos da hipertensão arterial.
Abstract Objective To compare the degree of agreement, correlation, and accuracy between the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and the Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index-20 (IVCF-20) instruments in older adults with systemic arterial hypertension (SAH). Method Cross-sectional household study with older adults from Montes Claros, MG. This study included only individuals with SAH whose data were collected from November 2016 to February 2017. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were determined. The Kappa statistic analyzed agreement and reliability, while the Pearson coefficient evaluated the correlation between the instruments. Results A total of 281 individuals with hypertension were included in this study. It was found that the prevalence of frailty was 31.3% according to the EFS and 22.1% according to the IVCF-20. The Kappa statistic was 0.604, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.621 (p<0.001). The accuracy was 84.34%. Conclusion The EFS and IVCF-20 instruments verified moderate agreement and reliability, strong positive correlation, and good accuracy. The results confirm the importance of standardizing the instrument to assess frailty in older adults with hypertension. The appropriate assessment of frailty aims to provide care focused on prevention and promotion that can prevent worsening health status and complications of arterial hypertension.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of triclosan-coated suture for the reduction of infection in saphenectomy wounds of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS: A total of 508 patients who underwent saphenectomy in CABG surgery were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial from February/2011 to June/2014. Patients were randomized into the triclosan-coated suture group (n= 251) and the conventional non-antibiotic suture group (n=257). Demographic (gender and age), clinical (body mass index, diabetes, and use of analgesics), and intraoperative (cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times) variables and those related to the saphenectomy wound (pain, dehiscence, erythema, infection, necrosis, and hyperthermia) were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 508 patients who underwent saphenectomy, 69.9% were males and 40.2% were diabetic. Thirty-three (6.5%) patients presented infection: 13 (5.3%) with triclosan and 20 (7.9%) with conventional suture (P=0.281). Among diabetic patients (n=204), triclosan suture was used in 45.1% with four cases of infection; conventional suture was used in 54.9% of them, with 11 cases of infection. Most patients (94.3%) underwent on-pump CABG. Wound pain was observed in 9.9% of patients with triclosan-coated suture and in 17.9% with conventional suture (P=0.011). Wound hyperthermia was found in 1.6% of patients with triclosan-coated suture and in 5.4% of those with conventional suture (P=0.028). CONCLUSION: Triclosan-coated suture shows lower infection rate in saphenectomy of patients undergoing CABG, although the differences were not statistically significant. Pain and wound hyperthermia were less frequent in patients with triclosan-coated sutures compared with conventional sutures.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Poliglactina 910/uso terapéutico , Vena Safena/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Técnicas de Sutura , Triclosán/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of triclosan-coated suture for the reduction of infection in saphenectomy wounds of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Methods: A total of 508 patients who underwent saphenectomy in CABG surgery were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial from February/2011 to June/2014. Patients were randomized into the triclosan-coated suture group (n= 251) and the conventional non-antibiotic suture group (n=257). Demographic (gender and age), clinical (body mass index, diabetes, and use of analgesics), and intraoperative (cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times) variables and those related to the saphenectomy wound (pain, dehiscence, erythema, infection, necrosis, and hyperthermia) were measured and analyzed. Results: Of the 508 patients who underwent saphenectomy, 69.9% were males and 40.2% were diabetic. Thirty-three (6.5%) patients presented infection: 13 (5.3%) with triclosan and 20 (7.9%) with conventional suture (P=0.281). Among diabetic patients (n=204), triclosan suture was used in 45.1% with four cases of infection; conventional suture was used in 54.9% of them, with 11 cases of infection. Most patients (94.3%) underwent on-pump CABG. Wound pain was observed in 9.9% of patients with triclosan-coated suture and in 17.9% with conventional suture (P=0.011). Wound hyperthermia was found in 1.6% of patients with triclosan-coated suture and in 5.4% of those with conventional suture (P=0.028). Conclusion: Triclosan-coated suture shows lower infection rate in saphenectomy of patients undergoing CABG, although the differences were not statistically significant. Pain and wound hyperthermia were less frequent in patients with triclosan-coated sutures compared with conventional sutures.