RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: From July 1, 1989, through March 31, 2001, 2466 patients with stage I seminoma were evaluated in three randomized noninferiority trials: the TE10, TE18, and TE19 trials. We analyzed mature results of these studies. METHODS: The TE10 trial randomly assigned 478 patients to para-aortic and ipsilateral iliac lymph node (dogleg field) or para-aortic only radiation therapy (total dose = 30 Gy). The TE18 trial randomly assigned 1094 patients to a total dose of 30 or 20 Gy of radiation therapy, predominantly to a para-aortic field. The TE19 trial randomly assigned 1477 patients to radiation therapy or a single injection of carboplatin at a dose of seven times the area under the curve. Time to relapse was determined from Kaplan-Meier curves, and such data were compared by use of Cox regression models. Noninferiority in TE18 and TE19 required the upper limit of the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) (reflecting the one-sided test for noninferiority at a 5% statistical significance level) to exclude a hazard ratio (HR) of greater than 2.0 and a doubling of the 5-year relapse rates observed in the control arm. The TE10 trial was not powered to exclude clinically relevant differences in overall relapse rates but was assessed against the same criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up times were 6.4-12 years in the three trials. We identified the noninferiority of the following treatments: 20 Gy of radiation therapy in the TE18 trial (HR of relapse = 0.63, 90% CI = 0.38 to 1.04) and carboplatin in the TE19 trial (HR of relapse = 1.25, 90% CI = 0.83 to 1.89). Para-aortic radiation therapy in the TE10 trial was associated with a hazard ratio of relapse of 1.15 (90% CI = 0.54 to 2.44). Relapse occurred after 3 years in only four (0.2%) of all 2466 patients. Computed tomography scans had little impact on the detection of relapse after radiation therapy; seven of the 904 patients allocated radiation therapy in TE19 had a relapse detected by this method. CONCLUSION: This large and mature dataset from three randomized trials has provided support for the use of either radiation therapy or carboplatin therapy as adjuvant treatment for stage I seminoma.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Seminoma/terapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Seminoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Seminoma/patología , Seminoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Neoplasias Testiculares/radioterapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Surgical resection of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph nodes is often performed in patients with advanced nonseminomatous testicular germ cell cancer. We previously developed a model to predict the probability that the lymph nodes contain only necrotic or fibrotic (benign) tissue versus mature teratoma and viable cancer (tumour) to identify patients who actually need resection. The present study used an updated model with new patient data and studied the validity of the updated model across various settings. METHODS: We combined data of 544 patients from the original model with data of 550 new patients and performed a new logistic regression analysis, which included the same six predictors: histology of the primary tumour, prechemotherapy serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, lactate dehydrogenase, residual mass size measured on computed tomography, and change in mass size. The validity of the updated model was studied in individual centres. Calibration of the predicted probabilities was assessed graphically and with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Discrimination was studied with the concordance (c)-statistic. RESULTS: The updated model had slightly different, although more precise, regression coefficients. Statistically nonsignificant Hosmer-Lemeshow tests confirmed good calibration in most centres. The c-statistic for all centres except one exceeded 0.80. The updated model was valid over the complete range of predicted probabilities across a broad spectrum of centres. CONCLUSIONS: This finding gives confidence in the applicability of the model to select patients for resection, particularly patients with small residual masses and low predicted probabilities of benign tissue (i.e., substantial predicted risks of residual tumour).
Asunto(s)
Modelos Estadísticos , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/secundario , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Espacio RetroperitonealRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the possibility of reducing radiotherapy doses without compromising efficacy in the management of patients with stage I seminoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 20 Gy/10 fractions over 2 weeks or 30 Gy/15 fractions during 3 weeks after orchidectomy. They completed a symptom diary card during treatment and quality-of-life forms pre- and post-treatment. The trial was powered to exclude absolute differences in 2-year relapse rates of 3% to 4% (alpha = .05 [one sided]; 90% power). RESULTS: From 1995 to 1998, 625 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. Four weeks after starting radiotherapy, significantly more patients receiving 30 Gy reported moderate or severe lethargy (20% v 5%) and an inability to carry out their normal work (46% v 28%). However, by 12 weeks, levels in both groups were similar. With a median follow-up of 61 months, 10 and 11 relapses, respectively, have been reported in the 30- and 20-Gy groups (hazard ratio, 1.11; 90% CI, 0.54 to 2.28). The absolute difference in 2-year relapse rates is 0.7%; the lower 90% confidence limit is 2.9%. Only one patient has died from seminoma (allocated to the 20-Gy treatment group). CONCLUSION: Treatment with 20 Gy in 10 fractions is unlikely to produce relapse rates more than 3% higher than for standard 30 Gy radiation therapy, and data on an additional 469 patients randomly assigned in a subsequent trial support and strengthen these results. Reductions in morbidity enable patients to return to work more rapidly. Prolonged follow-up is required before any inference can be made about any impact of allocated treatment on new primary cancer diagnoses.
Asunto(s)
Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Seminoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/radioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Orquiectomía , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoxia de la Célula , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológicoAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe global quality of life (GLQL) in patients with metastatic testicular cancer (TC) treated with four different schedules of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy (four v three cycles given over 5 v 3 days). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quality-of-life data were prospectively collected in 666 patients with metastatic TC entered into the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Trial 30941/United Kingdom Medical Research Council Trial TE20, using the EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 and a TC module. Data were analyzed by a mixed effects model and by evaluation of clinically relevant changes at 2 years. RESULTS: The pattern of GLQL changes was similar in the four groups. Two years after chemotherapy, 36% of patients displayed improved GLQL as compared with baseline, whereas GLQL had deteriorated in 13%. At 3 months, patients receiving the 3-day regimen experienced increased gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity more than those receiving the 5-day regimen, with the difference reaching the level of clinical relevance (>or = 10-point change) if four cycles were given. The 3-day schedule increased the 2-year risk of tinnitus, with clinical relevance demonstrated after four cycles. Long-term peripheral neuropathy and Raynaud-like phenomena were not associated with the number of cycles or days per cycle. At 2 years, Raynaud-like phenomena, tinnitus, or reduced hearing were reported by 21% to 26% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Because of the excess of acute GI toxicity and the increased risk of tinnitus after the 3-day regimen, we recommend the 5-day regimen if four cycles of BEP are planned. If only three cycles are to be given, then the 3-day regimen is acceptable, even given the increased risk of nausea/vomiting at 3 months.