RESUMEN
Mineral scaling is a major constraint that limits the performance of membrane distillation (MD) for hypersaline wastewater treatment. Although the use of antiscalants is a common industrial practice to mitigate mineral scaling, the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of antiscalants in inhibiting different mineral scaling types have not been systematically investigated. Herein, we perform a comparative investigation to elucidate the efficiencies of antiscalant candidates with varied functional groups for mitigating gypsum scaling and silica scaling in MD desalination. We show that antiscalants with Ca(II)-complexing moieties (e.g., carboxyl group) are the most effective to inhibit gypsum scaling formed via crystallization, whereas amino-enriched antiscalants possess the best performance to mitigate silica scaling created by polymerization. A set of microscopic and spectroscopic analyses reveal distinct mechanisms of antiscalants required for those two common types of scaling. The mitigating effect of antiscalants on gypsum scaling is attributed to the stabilization of scale precursors and nascent CaSO4 nuclei, which hinders phase transformation of amorphous CaSO4 toward crystalline gypsum. In contrast, antiscalants facilitate the polymerization of silicic acid, immobilizing active silica precursors and retarding the gelation of silica scale layer on the membrane surface. Our study, for the first time, demonstrates that antiscalants with different functionalities are required for the mitigation of gypsum scaling and silica scaling, providing mechanistic insights on the molecular design of antiscalants tailored to MD applications for the treatment of wastewaters containing different scaling types.
Asunto(s)
Destilación , Purificación del Agua , Sulfato de Calcio , Membranas Artificiales , Dióxido de SilicioRESUMEN
Leveraging waste heat has been considered to have significant potential for promoting the economic feasibility of wastewater treatment in unconventional oil and gas (UOG) production. However, its availability near well sites has not been fully understood and other energy sources may be also feasible. In this work, we quantitatively investigate the viability of using waste heat and well-pad natural gas to power on-site wastewater treatment by membrane distillation (MD) for twenty randomly selected wells located in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin, U.S. Results show that waste heat produced from on-site electrical loads is insufficient for MD treatment of all the wastewater generated during UOG production (2.2-24.3% of thermal energy required for MD treatment). Waste heat from hydraulic fracturing, which persists only for a short timeframe, is able to meet the full or partial energy requirement during the peak period of wastewater production (17-1005% of thermal energy required for MD treatment within the first two months of production), but this scenario varies among wells and is dependent on the energy efficiency of MD. Compared to waste heat, natural gas is a more consistent energy source. The treatment capacity of MD powered by natural gas at the well pad exceeds full wastewater treatment demands for all the twenty wells, with only two wells requiring short-term wastewater storage. Our work indicates that although waste heat has the potential to reduce the electricity consumption and cost of UOG wastewater treatment, it is unlikely to supply sufficient thermal energy required by MD for long-term treatment. Natural gas can serve as an alternative or complementary energy resource. Further investigations, in particular techno-economic analyses, are needed to identify the best suitable energy source or combination for on-site UOG wastewater treatment.