RESUMEN

Purpose: This work aims to evaluate the hypothesis that the value of Hounsfield units (HU), as a marker of bone density, in preoperative wrist computed tomography (CT) scans correlates with the functional outcomes as measured by patient reported outcomes (PROs) after distal radius fracture surgery with volar locking plate fixation. Methods: Of a database of 92 wrist fractures operated on in our hospital between 2011 and 2020, with a preoperative CT scan performed, we selected the cases with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final cohort comprised 64 patients. Three measurements of HU were performed in correlative coronal sections of the capitate bone. PROs were determined using two functional questionnaires (DASH and PRWE) and one quality of life questionnaire (SF-12). The statistical relationship between PROs and the HU measurements obtained via a CT scan was analyzed. Results: Patients were classified into two groups, osteoporotic (OST) or non-osteoporotic (non-OST), according to the optimal cut-off value of 323 HU selected using a ROC curve. The median DASH questionnaire score in the OST group was significantly higher (1.7 vs 10.0, p = 0.003). Conclusion: HU values in preoperative wrist CT scans may help to identify osteoporotic bone in patients prior to wrist fracture surgery and lead to an improved surgical indication and treatment strategy. Level of Evidence: Level of evidence: Prognostic III.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in patients with proximal humerus fractures (PHF) treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a revision procedure for failed fixation that have more than 5 years of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 270 RTSA. The inclusion criteria for this study consisted of patients initially treated with either open reduction and plate fixation (ORIF) or fixation using an intramedullary nail (IMN), who were managed with a single-stage revision to a RTSA, and had a minimum of 24 months clinical and radiological follow-up. Six patients with failed fixation of displaced PHF were revised with RTSA. One patient was excluded from the study because she died. Five shoulders were reviewed for the purpose of this study. The patients were evaluated using Constant score, relative Constant score and visual analogue scale for pain. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 89 months (65-108). The mean absolute Constant score improved from 31, 81 to 44, 2 and the relative Constant score improved from 31,81% to 67,2%. Mean VAS improved from 6, 8 to 2. One patient rated their outcome excellent, 1good, 1 satisfied and 2 poor. CONCLUSION: RTSA is an appropriate treatment as a revision surgery for failed fixation of PHF. Patients should be adequately warned that they will improve their function but may have complications following this salvage procedure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Large glenoid defects are a difficult reconstructive problem for shoulder surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the complications, rate of healing, and functional results of glenoid bone grafting in primary or revision surgery with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients with glenoid bone loss who underwent primary or revision surgery using a glenoid bone graft with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Range of motion and the Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and visual analog scale scores were obtained from preoperative assessment and the latest follow-up visit. Radiographic evaluation included analysis of plain radiographs as well as preoperative and follow-up computed tomography. RESULTS: Three patients were excluded from the study. Allografts were used in 13 cases and autografts in 7 cases. The mean Constant score improved from 30.7 ± 9.4 to 51.3 ± 13.4 (P < .001). At a mean follow-up of 26 months, computed tomography imaging revealed that the glenoid bone graft was fully incorporated in 95% of cases. No statistically significant differences were found on analysis of the clinical and radiographic outcomes related to the graft source. There was a 20% postoperative complication rate: 1 case of aseptic glenoid component loosening, 1 surgical wound hematoma, 1 acromial fracture, and a symptomatic grade 3 scapular notching. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bone grafts in glenoid defects is a useful technique by which, in the majority of cases, single-stage reconstruction surgery may be performed, even in the presence of severe bone loss. Incorporation rates are high, with satisfactory clinical outcome.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Severe cases of osteoarthritis with ligamentous instability require the use of a modular knee arthoplasty. To assess the survival, the complications, the clinical, radiological and functional outcomes, and the quality of life of those patients in whom a Optetrak Condylar Constrained Knee (CCK) had been implanted as a primary implant. To study how the pre-operative conditions (deformity, age, sex …) and the characteristics of the arthroplasty (stems, supplements, constrained component …) could change the survival or the clinical outcomes of the implants. METHODS: We performed an observational retrospective study of 105 CCKs implanted between 1999 and 2005. The mean follow-up was nine years (7, 13). Mean age was 70.5 years. The mortality was 6.9 %. There were 9.3 % of the patients lost during the follow-up. We studied all the medical files of the patients in order to assess the pre-operative, surgical and postoperative conditions. We used the Knee Society Score (KSS), both clinical and functional, to study the functional and clinical situation. We analysed the X-ray using the Knee Society roentgenographic evaluation. The quality of life was studied using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Then in order to find predictor conditions, we made statistical multivariable predictive studies attending to the preoperative factors and to the arthroplasty conditions to compare both outcomes and survival (Kaplan-Meier groups curves and Cox Multivariable Models [hazard ratio]). Processing and data analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0. RESULTS: The outcomes did not show differences between all the groups. While the mean result of the clinical KSS was 75.8, the mean functional KSS was 73.1. We did not find a condition associated with worst results of the knees (p > 0.05). The KSS obtained was excellent or good in 74.9 %. The global survival at 24 months was 93.8 % and at 96 months was 90.1 %. There were some conditions associated with poorest survival of the arthroplasties: patients younger than 70 years old, tibial tuberosity osteotomy, use of long stems and new surgery two months after arthoplasty (p < 0.05). The 11.1 % of the arthroplasties required more surgeries (3.3 % were soft tissue surgeries and 7.8 % were revisions). The mean OKS obtained was 34.78. Satisfaction was obtained by 86.2 % of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: All severe and unstable knees obtained similar and overall excellent-good outcomes and survival using the Optetrak CCK. Although we found that there are some factors that could change the survival of the total knee replacement, these did not change the outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We used the Optetrak Condylar Constrained (CCK) implant, a modular and constrained knee implant as replacement for a failed primary arthroplasty, to assess the survivorship, the complications, the clinical, radiological, and functional situation, and the quality of life of those patients in whom a CCK had been implanted in recent years in order to find predictive pre-operative conditions of survival and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 125 CCK implanted between 1999 and 2005. The mean follow-up was nine years (range, seven to 13). Mean age was 73.6 years. A total of 78% of the revised TKA were cemented and 66% were CR. We assessed the pre-operative, the operative and the postoperative conditions studying the medical files of all the patients. In order to study the functional and clinical situation we used the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and the Knee Society score (KSS), both clinical and functional. We analysed all the X-rays using the Knee Society Roentgenographic evaluation. The quality of life was studied using the Oxford knee score (OKS). RESULTS: The mean results of the KSS clinical and the KSS functional were 68.24 and 63.85, respectively. There were not any conditions associated with poor results of the knees (p > 0.05). The global survival at 24 months was 92.7%, at 60 months 87.8% and at 96 months it was 87.8%. There were some conditions associated with poor survival of the knees, e.g. patients were younger than 70 years old, rheumatic diseases, kidney faliure, tibial tuberosity osteotomy, PS primary arthroplasty, revision before five years and septic loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results there are some pre-operative factors that change the survival of the total knee replacement revision.

Asunto(s)