RESUMEN

Measurement of the delta(13)C value of soil-respired CO(2) (delta(r)) has become a commonplace method through which ecosystem function and C dynamics can be better understood. Despite its proven utility there is currently no consensus on the most robust method with which to measure delta(r). Static and dynamic chamber systems are both commonly used for this purpose; however, the literature on these methods provides evidence suggesting that measurements of delta(r) made with these chamber systems are neither repeatable (self-consistent) nor comparable across methodologies. Here we use a three-dimensional (3-D) numerical soil-atmosphere-chamber model to test these chamber systems in a 'surrogate reality'. Our simulations show that each chamber methodology is inherently biased and that no chamber methodology can accurately predict the true delta(r) signature under field conditions. If researchers intend to use delta(r) to study in situ ecosystem processes, the issues with these chamber systems need to be corrected either by using diffusive theory or by designing a new, unbiased delta(r) measurement system.