RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has become the preferred treatment modality for femoropopliteal disease. However, there is limited evidence regarding its procedural and clinical outcomes according to the affected area. AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes and device effectiveness according to treatment extent in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), popliteal artery (PA), or both. METHODS: In this study, we analysed EVT for SFA (2,404 limbs), PA (155 limbs), SFA/PA (383 limbs) using the population in the K-VIS ELLA (Korean Vascular Intervention Society Endovascular Therapy in Lower Limb Artery Diseases) registry. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at 2 years. RESULTS: The SFA/PA group exhibited a higher prevalence of anatomical complexity, characterised by long lesions, moderate to severe calcification, and total occlusion. The procedures were successful in 97.2% of SFA, 92.9% of PA, and 95.6% of SFA/PA EVTs. The 2-year TLR rates were 21.1%, 18.6%, and 32.7% in the SFA, PA, and SFA/PA groups, respectively. SFA/PA EVT was associated with a significantly increased risk for TLR compared to the SFA group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.48 [1.09-2.00]; p=0.008) and a trend towards an increased risk compared to the PA group (adjusted HR 1.80 [1.00-3.27]; p=0.052). After overlap weighting, the use of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) was shown to be beneficial, with the lowest TLR rate after SFA and SFA/PA EVT. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world registry, SFA/PA EVT was associated with an increased risk for TLR at 2 years compared to the SFA or PA EVT groups, with favourable outcomes when using a DCB or drug-eluting stent in the SFA/PA EVT group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cigarette smoking is a significant risk factor for coronary artery disease. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the long-term clinical effects of smoking in Asian populations with chronic total occlusion (CTO). This study aimed to assess the effects of smoking on 5-year (median follow-up period, 4.2 ± 1.5 [interquartile range, 4.06-5.0] years) clinical outcomes in patients with CTO lesions who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical treatment (MT). We enrolled 681 consecutive patients with CTO who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography and subsequent PCI or MT. The patients were categorized into smokers (n = 304) and nonsmokers (n = 377). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization over a 5-year period. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to adjust for potential baseline confounders. After PSM analysis, two propensity-matched groups (200 pairs, n = 400) were generated, and the baseline characteristics of both groups were balanced. The smokers exhibited a higher cardiovascular risk of MACE (29.5% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.010) and non-TVR (17.5 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.044) than the nonsmokers. In a landmark analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves at 1 year, the smokers had a significantly higher rate of MACE in the early period (up to 1 year) (18.8% and 9.2%, respectively; p = 0.008) compared with the nonsmokers. The Cox hazard regression analysis with propensity score adjustment revealed that smoking was independently associated with an increased risk of MACE. These findings indicate that smoking is a strong cardiovascular risk factor in patients with CTO, regardless of the treatment strategy (PCI or MT). In addition, in the subgroup analysis, the risk of MACE was most prominently elevated in the group of smokers who underwent PCI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Because there is a lack of comparative studies assessing drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) outcomes with respect to intraluminal (IL) and subintimal (SI) approaches in femoropopliteal (FP) total occlusive lesions, we compared the outcomes between DCB (including bailout stenting) and DES treatments for this lesion. A total of 487 limbs (434 patients) were divided into the IL (n = 344, DCB: n = 268, DES: n = 76) and SI (n = 143, DCB: n = 83, DES: n = 60) approach groups. The primary outcome was a major adverse limb event (MALE), defined as above-ankle amputation or repeat revascularization of the index limb. Secondary outcomes included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), loss of clinical patency, and all-cause death. After adjustment, in each IL and SI approach, the 2-year rates of MALE (p = 0.180 and p = 0.236, respectively), TLR, loss of clinical patency, and all-cause death were similar between the DCB and DES groups. In the DCB and DES groups, both primary and secondary outcomes were similar between the IL and SI approaches. DCB and DES strategies for patients presenting with FP total occlusive lesions demonstrated similar outcomes regardless of the IL or SI approach.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02748226.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (CHR) is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), but its predictive value for long-term adverse outcomes in patients with CAD following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unexplored and is the subject of this study. Patients with CAD who underwent PCI at the Korea University Guro Hospital-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (KUGH-PCI) Registry since 2004 were included. Patients were categorized into tertiles according to their CHR. The end points were all-cause mortality (ACM), cardiac mortality (CM) and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariate Cox regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) and sensitivity analyses were performed. A total of 3260 patients were included and divided into Group 1 (CHR <0.830, N = 1089), Group 2 (CHR = 0.830-3.782, N = 1085) and Group 3 (CHR >3.782, N = 1086). Higher CHR tertiles were associated with progressively greater risks of ACM, CM and MACEs (log-rank, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression showed that patients in the highest tertile had greater risks of ACM (HR: 2.127 [1.452-3.117]), CM (HR: 3.575 [1.938-6.593]) and MACEs (HR: 1.337 [1.089-1.641]) than those in the lowest tertile. RCS analyses did not reveal a significant non-linear relationship between CHR and ACM, CM or MACEs. The significant associations remained significant in the sensitivity analyses, RCS analyses with or without extreme values, subgroup analyses and multiple imputations for missing data. Elevated CHR is a novel, independent risk factor for long-term ACM, CM and MACEs in CAD patients following PCI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant factor in increased mortality rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but research on its impact on the long-term outcomes in patients with MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is limited. Thus, a comparison of the 3-year clinical outcomes between the DM and non-DM groups among patients with MINOCA was undertaken. METHODS: From the Korea AMI Registry-National Institute of Health dataset, 10,774 AMI patients were enrolled. After applying the exclusion criteria, 379 patients with MINOCA were included. The primary clinical outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary outcomes were the individual components of MACCE. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratios for 3-year MACCE (2.287, p = 0.010), all-cause death (2.845, p = 0.004), and non-cardiac death (non-CD, 3.914, p = 0.008) were higher in the DM group than in the non-DM group. It is speculated that the higher non-CD rate in the MINOCA group is attributable to a higher proportion of patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI in the total study population. The CD, recurrent MI, revascularization, and stroke rates were similar between the DM and non-DM groups. DM, advanced age, cardiopulmonary resuscitation on admission, and non-use of statin medications were significant predictors of MACCE. CONCLUSIONS: In this study involving patients with MINOCA, the DM group exhibited a higher 3-year mortality rate than the non-DM group. Thus, DM demonstrated a hazardous effect even in patients with MINOCA.

RESUMEN

Statin is crucial for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. However, the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) associated with statin is a concern. This study aimed to determine the incremental diabetogenic effects of statins according to their intensity and dose in AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among 13,104 patients enrolled in the Korea AMI Registry between 2011 and 2015, 6152 patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent PCI and received moderate-to-high-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were selected for the study. The endpoints were NODM and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, and revascularization up to 3 years. Among the participants, 3747 and 2405 received moderate- and high-intensity statins, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a higher incidence of NODM in patients with high-intensity statins than those with moderate-intensity. High-intensity statin was a significant predictor of NODM after adjusting for other co-variables (HR = 1.316, 95% CI 1.024-1.692; P < 0.032). Higher dose of rosuvastatin was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of NODM, but this dose-dependency was not apparent with atorvastatin. Cumulative incidence of MACE decreased dose-dependently only with atorvastatin. High-intensity statin was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of NODM in AMI patients, and this association was more evident in rosuvastatin. The different diabetogenic effects of the two statins provide supporting evidence for understanding the nuanced nature of statin treatment in relation to NODM.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to compare the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: We categorized 4558 patients with NSTEMI as either RASI users (3752 patients) or non-users (806 patients). The 3-year patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), which included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (HF), was the primary outcome. To compare clinical outcomes, a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was calculated after performing multicollinearity tests on all significant confounding variables (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Among RASI users, the aHRs for POCO, all-cause death, and cardiac death were significantly higher in the HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) subgroup than in the HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) (1.610, 2.120, and 2.489; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) (2.234, 3.920, and 5.215; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) subgroups. The aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFmrEF subgroup than the HFpEF subgroup (1.416, 1.843, and 2.172, respectively). Among RASI non-users, the aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFrEF subgroup than the HFmrEF (2.573, 3.172, and 3.762, respectively) and HFpEF (2.425, 3.805, and 4.178, respectively) subgroups. In three LVEF subgroups, RASI users exhibited lower aHRs for POCO and all-cause death than RASI non-users. CONCLUSION: In the RASI users group, the aHRs for POCO and mortality were highest in the HFrEF subgroup, intermediate in the HFmrEF subgroup, and lowest in the HFpEF subgroup.

RESUMEN

Iliac artery angioplasty with stenting is an effective alternative treatment modality for aortoiliac occlusive diseases. Few randomized controlled trials have compared the efficacy and safety between self-expandable stent (SES) and balloon-expandable stent (BES) in atherosclerotic iliac artery disease. In this randomized, multicenter study, patients with common or external iliac artery occlusive disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either BES or SES. The primary end point was the 1-year clinical patency, defined as freedom from any surgical or percutaneous intervention due to restenosis of the target lesion after the index procedure. The secondary end point was a composite event from major adverse clinical events at 1 year. A total of 201 patients were enrolled from 17 major cardiovascular intervention centers in South Korea. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 66.8 ± 8.5 years and 86.2% of the participants were male. The frequency of critical limb ischemia was 15.4%, and the most common target lesion was in the common iliac artery (75.1%). As the primary end point, the 1-year clinical patency as primary end point was 99% in the BES group and 99% in the SES group (p > 0.99). The rate of repeat revascularization at 1 year was 7.8% in the BES group and 7.0% in the SES group (p = 0.985; confidence interval, 1.011 [0.341-2.995]). In our randomized study, the treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease with self-expandable versus balloon-expandable stent was comparable in 12-month clinical outcomes without differences in the procedural success or geographic miss rate regardless of the deployment method in the distal aortoiliac occlusive lesion (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01834495).

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The K-ELUVIA study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Eluvia™, a polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stent, for femoropopliteal artery disease using data from a prospective Korean multicenter registry. METHODS: A total of 105 patients with femoropopliteal artery disease who received endovascular treatment (EVT) with Eluvia™ stents at 7 Korean sites were enrolled in a prospective cohort and followed for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the 2-year clinical patency. The secondary endpoint was 2-year freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Mean patient age was 68.2±10.4 years, and most patients (82.7%) were male. Mean lesion length was 168.3±117.6 mm. Chronic total occlusion was found in 57.7% of patients. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) type C or D lesions were present in 46.1% of patients. Procedural success was achieved in 99.0% of patients. The clinical patency rate was 84.4% at 1 year after EVT and 76.3% at 2 years post-EVT. The freedom from TLR rate was 89.1% at 1 year after EVT and 79.1% at 2 years post-EVT. Chronic total occlusion (hazard ratio [HR], 3.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-11.67; p=0.039) and smaller mean stent diameter (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-0.98; p=0.044) were identified as independent predictors of loss of clinical patency at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The K-ELUVIA study demonstrated favorable 2-year clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of Eluvia stent for femoropopliteal artery lesions in real-world practice.

RESUMEN

Previous studies have reported associations between newly diagnosed diabetes and poor outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but there is limited data focusing on elderly patients (age ≥ 65). This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and clinical implications of newly diagnosed diabetes in elderly patients who underwent PCI. From 2004 to 2021, a total of 2456 elderly patients who underwent invasive PCI at Korea University Guro Hospital were prospectively enrolled and followed up for a median of five years. The primary endpoint was five-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cox regression was used to evaluate whether newly diagnosed diabetes impacted on long-term clinical outcomes. Newly diagnosed diabetes was presented in approximately 8.1% to 10.9% of elderly patients who underwent PCI. Those who had a new diagnosis of diabetes had a higher risk of MACE than previously known diabetes (25.28% vs. 19.15%, p = 0.039). After adjusting for significant factors, newly diagnosed diabetes remained an independent predictor of MACE (HR [hazard ratio] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.17, p < 0.001), cardiac death (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.29-3.59, p = 0.003) and repeat revascularization (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.11, p = 0.013), but not for non-fatal myocardial infarction (HR 1.66, 95% CI 0.94-2.12, p = 0.081). Newly diagnosed diabetes was associated with an increased risk of 5-year MACE compared with non-diabetes and previously diagnosed diabetes in elderly patients underwent PCI. More attention should be given to those elderly newly diagnosed diabetes population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The popliteal artery is generally regarded as a "no-stent zone." Limited data are available on the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for popliteal artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes among patients who received DCB treatment for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter registry study enrolled 100 patients from 7 Korean endovascular centers who underwent endovascular therapy using IN.PACT DCB (Medtronic) for symptomatic atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. The primary endpoint was 12-month clinical primary patency and the secondary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free rate. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 65.7±10.8 years, and 77% of enrolled patients were men. The mean lesion length was 93.7±53.7 mm, and total occlusions were present in 45% of patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined atherectomy was performed in 17% and provisional stenting was required in 11%. Out of the enrolled patients, 91 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival rates at 12 months were 76.0% and 87.2%, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified female and longer lesion length as the significant independent predictors of loss of patency. CONCLUSIONS: DCB treatment yielded favorable 12-month clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival outcomes in patients with popliteal artery disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02698345.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Outpatient monitoring of pulmonary congestion in heart failure (HF) patients may reduce hospitalization rates. This study tested the feasibility of non-invasive high-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (HF-BIA) for estimating lung fluid status. METHODS: This prospective study included 70 participants: 50 with acute HF (HF group) and 20 without HF (control group). All participants underwent a supine chest CT scan to measure lung fluid content with lung density analysis software. Concurrently, direct segmental multi-frequency BIA was performed to assess the edema index (EI) of the trunk, entire body, and extremities. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients between lung fluid content and EI measured using HF-BIA were r = 0.566 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.550 (p < 0.001) for the trunk and whole body, respectively. In the HF group, the trunk EI (0.402 ± 0.015) and whole body EI (0.402 ± 0.016) were significantly higher than those of the control group (trunk EI, 0.383 ± 0.007; whole body EI, 0.383 ± 0.007; all p < 0.001). The lung fluid content was significantly higher in the HF than that in the control group (23.7 ± 5.3 vs. 15.5 ± 2.8%, p < 0.001). The log value of NT pro-BNP was significantly correlated with trunk EI (r = 0.688, p < 0.001) and whole-body EI (r = 0.675, p < 0.001) measured by HF-BIA, and the lung fluid content analyzed by CT (r = 0.686, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BIA-based EI measurements of the trunk and whole body significantly correlated with lung fluid content and NT pro-BNP levels. Non-invasive BIA could be a promising screening tool for lung fluid status monitoring in acute HF patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ultimaster™, a third-generation sirolimus-eluting stent using biodegradable polymer, has been introduced to overcome long term adverse vascular events, such as restenosis or stent thrombosis. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes of Ultimaster™ stents in Korean patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: This study is a multicenter, prospective, observational registry across 12 hospitals. To reflect real-world clinical evidence, non-selective subtypes of patients and lesions were included in this study. The study end point was target lesion failure (TLF) (the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [MI], and target lesion revascularization [TLR]) at 12-month clinical follow up. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients were enrolled between November 2016 and May 2021. Most of the patients were male (76.5%), with a mean age of 66.0±11.2 years. Among the included patients, 40.1% had diabetes mellitus (DM) and 67.9% had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). At 12 months, the incidence of TLF was 4.1%. The incidence of cardiac death was 1.5%, MI was 1.0%, TLR was 2.7%, and stent thrombosis was 0.6%. In subgroup analysis based on the presence of ACS, DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or bifurcation, there were no major differences in the incidence of the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: The present registry shows that Ultimaster™ stent is safe and effective for routine real-world clinical practice in non-selective Korean patients, having a low rate of adverse events at least up to 12 months.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study compared the safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel/cilostazol-eluting Cilotax stents with those of everolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Real-world data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry were examined. METHODS: A total of 5,472 patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with Cilotax stents (n = 212) or everolimus-eluting stents (n = 5,260). The primary end point was the 3-year rate of target lesion failure. The other end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization), target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders by using a logistic regression model; propensity score matching generated 2 well-balanced groups (Cilotax group, n = 180; everolimus-eluting stents group, n = 170; N = 350). After propensity score matching, baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. RESULTS: After percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with the everolimus-eluting stents group, the Cilotax group more often had major adverse cardiovascular events (24.1% vs 18.5%; P = .042), myocardial infarction (8.0% vs 3.2%; P < .001), target lesion revascularization (8.0% vs 2.6%; P < .001), target vessel revascularization (11.3% vs 4.5%; P < .001), and stent thrombosis (4.7% vs 0.5%; P < .001) before matching. Even after matching, the Cilotax group had more frequent target lesion revascularization (9.4% vs 2.9%; P = .22) and stent thrombosis (5.6% vs 1.2%; P = .34). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, use of the Cilotax stent was associated with higher rates of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis than were everolimus-eluting stents. Use of the Cilotax dual drugeluting stent should be avoided in the treatment of myocardial infarction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Importance: Cardiovascular benefits of mild to moderate alcohol consumption need to be validated in the context of behavioral changes. The benefits of reduced alcohol consumption among people who drink heavily across different subtypes of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are unclear. Objective: To investigate the association between reduced alcohol consumption and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in individuals who drink heavily across different CVD subtypes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening database and self-reported questionnaires. The nationally representative cohort comprised Korean citizens aged 40 to 79 years who had national health insurance coverage on December 31, 2002, and were included in the 2002 to 2003 National Health Screening Program. People who drank heavily who underwent serial health examinations over 2 consecutive periods (first period: 2005-2008; second period: 2009-2012) were included and analyzed between February and May 2023. Heavy drinking was defined as more than 4 drinks (56 g) per day or more than 14 drinks (196 g) per week for males and more than 3 drinks (42 g) per day or more than 7 drinks (98 g) per week for females. Exposures: Habitual change in heavy alcohol consumption during the second health examination period. People who drank heavily at baseline were categorized into 2 groups according to changes in alcohol consumption during the second health examination period as sustained heavy drinking or reduced drinking. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of MACEs, a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction or angina undergoing revascularization, any stroke accompanied by hospitalization, and all-cause death. Results: Of the 21 011 participants with heavy alcohol consumption at baseline (18 963 males [90.3%]; mean [SD] age, 56.08 [6.16] years) included in the study, 14 220 (67.7%) sustained heavy drinking, whereas 6791 (32.2%) shifted to mild to moderate drinking. During the follow-up of 162 378 person-years, the sustained heavy drinking group experienced a significantly higher incidence of MACEs than the reduced drinking group (817 vs 675 per 100 000 person-years; log-rank P = .003). Reduced alcohol consumption was associated with a 23% lower risk of MACEs compared with sustained heavy drinking (propensity score matching hazard ratio [PSM HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88). These benefits were mostly accounted for by a significant reduction in the incidence of angina (PSM HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97) and ischemic stroke (PSM HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86). The preventive attributes of reduced alcohol intake were consistently observed across various subgroups of participants. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that reducing alcohol consumption is associated with a decreased risk of future CVD, with the most pronounced benefits expected for angina and ischemic stroke.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A growing evidence on the correlation between hyperuricemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been previously reported. However, there have been limited data on the impact of hyperuricemia on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). METHODS: A total of 425 peripheral artery disease patients who underwent PTA for CLI were enrolled. The patients were divided into the hyperuricemia group (n = 101) and the normal group (n = 324). The primary endpoint was major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular event (MACCE), including death, myocardial infarction, any coronary revascularization, and stroke, up to 5 years. The secondary endpoint was a major adverse limb event (MALE), including any repeated PTA, and target extremity surgery. Inverse probability weighting (IPTW) analysis, derived from the logistic regression model, was performed to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: After IPTW matching analysis, compared to the normal group, the hyperuricemia group was associated with a higher incidence of MACCE (20.7% vs. 13.6%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.38, P  = 0.006) including non-cardiac death (11.7% vs. 6.3%, HR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.19-3.19, P  = 0.006) and MALE (47.7% vs. 36.0%, HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.23-2.13, P  = 0.001) including non-target extremity revascularization (15.0% vs. 6.8%, HR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.52-3.84, P  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the present study, hyperuricemia was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with CLI following PTA during 5-year clinical follow-up. Efficacy of controlling hyperuricemia in improving clinical outcomes should be evaluated in further studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefits of transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are uncertain because of the limited availability of device selection. This study aimed to compare the procedural differences and the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of TRA and TFA for bifurcation PCI using second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). METHODS: Based on data from the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry III, a retrospective registry of 2,648 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI with second-generation DES from 21 centers in South Korea, patients were categorized into the TRA group (n = 1,507) or the TFA group (n = 1,141). After propensity score matching (PSM), procedural differences, in-hospital outcomes, and device-oriented composite outcomes (DOCOs; a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) were compared between the two groups (772 matched patients each group). RESULTS: Despite well-balanced baseline clinical and lesion characteristics after PSM, the use of the two-stent strategy (14.2% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.001) and the incidence of in-hospital adverse outcomes, primarily driven by access site complications (2.2% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.015), were significantly lower in the TRA group than in the TFA group. At the 5-year follow-up, the incidence of DOCOs was similar between the groups (6.3% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.639). CONCLUSION: The findings suggested that TRA may be safer than TFA for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DESs. Despite differences in treatment strategy, TRA was associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes as those of TFA. Therefore, TRA might be the preferred access for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DES. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03068494.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Recent trials have shown that both the extent of glycated hemoglobin reduction and the duration of enhanced glycemic control are major factors that may affect cardiovascular outcome results. We aimed to investigate the impact of metformin (MET) combined with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors or sulfonylureas (SU) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: This study was a prospective cohort trial. From November 2011 to December 2015, a total of 13,104 AMI patients were consecutively enrolled from the Korea AMI registry-National Institutes of Health. The patients were divided into the MET + DPP4 inhibitors group and the MET + SU group. The primary endpoint, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), was defined as the composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), and any repeat revascularization up to 3-year follow-up. To adjust baseline potential confounders, an inverse probability weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed. Results: Baseline well-matched two groups were generated (the MET + DPP4 inhibitors group, n=468 and the MET + SU group, n=468). During 3-year clinical follow-up, the cumulative incidence of MACE between the two groups was not significantly different after adjustment (16.8% for MET + DPP4 inhibitors group vs. 19.4% for MET + SU group, P=0.302). However, the MET + DPP4 inhibitors group was associated with reduced risk of MI [1.3% vs. 4.9%; hazard ratio (HR): 0.228, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.090-0.580, P=0.001] than the MET + SU group. Conclusions: In patients with AMI and type 2 DM, the use of MET combined with DPP4 inhibitors was associated with reduced incidence of recurrent MI than MET combined with SU during 3-year follow-up.