RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the use of pictograms improves symptom evaluation for children with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs). STUDY DESIGN: This survey study was conducted in 2 academic centers and included patients aged 8-18 years visiting the outpatient clinic for FAPD symptom evaluation. Patients were randomized to fill out the questionnaire without or with accompanying pictograms to assess gastrointestinal symptoms. Afterwards, patients underwent clinical health assessment by the healthcare professional (HCP). Subsequently, the HCP filled out the same questionnaire without pictograms, while blinded to the questionnaire completed by the patient. Primary outcome was the level of agreement between identified symptoms as assessed by patients and HCP. RESULTS: We included 144 children (questionnaire without accompanying pictograms [n = 82] and with accompanying pictograms [n = 62]). Overall agreements rates were not significantly different (without pictograms median, 70% vs with pictograms median, 70%). Accompanying pictograms did not significantly improve the assessment of abdominal pain symptoms. Accompanying pictograms were beneficial for concordance rates for nausea and vomiting symptoms (without pictograms median, 67% vs with pictograms median, 100%; P = .047). Subgroup analyses for children aged 8-12 years of age revealed similar results (concordance on the presence of nausea and vomiting without pictograms median, 67% vs with pictograms median, 100%; P = .015). Subgroup analyses for children ages 12-18 years showed no significant differences in concordance rates. CONCLUSIONS: Pictograms do not seem to improve the assessment of FAPDs. However, the use of pictograms improves the evaluation of nausea and vomiting, especially for children aged 8-12 years. Therefore, HCPs could consider using pictograms in that setting during consultations.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Niño , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/complicaciones , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Náusea , Vómitos , Personal de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop a core outcome set for clinical studies assessing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children. STUDY DESIGN: This core outcome set was developed using a 2-round Delphi technique and adhering to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Initiative (OMERACT 2.0) recommendations. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) and (parents of) children (age 1-18 years) with a GERD diagnosis (ie, the presence of bothersome symptoms), listed up to 5 harmful and/or beneficial outcomes that they considered important in the treatment of GERD. Outcomes mentioned by more than 10% of participants were put forward and rated and prioritized by HCPs, parents, and children in a second round. Outcomes with the highest rank formed the draft core outcome set. The final core outcome set was created during an online consensus meeting between an expert panel. RESULTS: The first round was completed by 118 of 125 HCPs (94%), 146 of 146 parents (100%), and 69 of 70 children (99%). A total of 80 of 118 HCPs (68%), 130 of 140 parents (93%), and 77 children (100%) completed round 2. "Adequate relief," "evidence of esophagitis," "feeding difficulties," "heartburn (≥4 years)," "hematemesis," "regurgitation," "sleeping difficulties," "vomiting," and "adverse events" were included in the final core outcome set for GERD in children aged 1-18 years. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a total set of 9 core outcomes and suggest these outcomes to be minimally measured in clinical studies assessing GERD in children. Implementation of this core outcome set is likely to increase comparison between studies and may thus provide future recommendations to improve treatment of GERD in children.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Reumatología , Niño , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To ensure consistency and reduce outcome measure reporting heterogeneity in clinical trials on pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs), a core outcome set (COS) was developed for pediatric FAPD trials. STUDY DESIGN: A mixed-method 2-round Delphi technique was used and key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients with FAPD, and their parents were invited to participate. In the first round, key stakeholders identified outcomes of importance through an open-ended questionnaire. Outcomes mentioned by ≥10% of the participants were included in a shortlist. In the second round, this shortlist was rated and prioritized. During a consensus meeting with an expert panel, the final COS was defined. RESULTS: The first round was completed by 152 of 210 (72%) HCPs, 103 (100%) parents, and 50 of 54 (93%) patients. A total of 104 from 167 (62%) HCPs, 102 (100%) parents, and 53 (100%) patients completed round 2. Pain intensity, pain frequency, quality of life, school attendance, anxiety/depression, adequate relief, defecation pattern (disease specific, irritable bowel syndrome), and adverse events were included in the final COS for FAPDs. CONCLUSION: A set of 8 core outcomes has been identified that should minimally be measured in pediatric FAPD trials. Implementation of the use of this COS will increase comparison between studies and, therefore, improve management of children with FAPDs.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Técnica Delphi , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the additional value of blood parameters (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) to anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG), fecal calprotectin, and Giardia lamblia when discriminating a functional from an organic cause in the clinical evaluation of children with chronic abdominal pain. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included patients (4-18 years of age) with abdominal pain for >2 months. Data on hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anti-tTG, fecal calprotectin, alarm symptoms, and diagnosis were collected. RESULTS: We identified 853 patients, of whom 102 (12%) had an organic disorder. Sensitivity and the area under the curve of strategy 1 (fecal calprotectin, anti-tTG, G lamblia, blood parameters) were 90% (95% CI, 83-95) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.93), respectively, compared with 88% (95% CI, 81-93) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.91), respectively, for strategy 2 (fecal calprotectin, anti-tTG, G lamblia) (P = NS). In the presence of ≥1 alarm symptoms, the sensitivity of strategies 1 and 2 was 92% (95% CI, 83-96) and 92% (95% CI, 83-96), and the areas under the curve were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.97) (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: To distinguish between a functional and an organic cause for chronic abdominal pain, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate can be left out from the clinical evaluation as they might have no additional diagnostic yield. However, caution should be taken not to miss extraintestinal infections (2%).