RESUMEN
The data gained from clinical studies in the past years have indicated that the thrombolytic therapy (TL) has favourable effect on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is aimed at reperfusion in the ischaemic area, a decrease in the extent of infarction site and a decrease in mortality. TL administered within the initial hours after the onset of AMI leads to better results than when administered after several hours. Currently, TL is not limited by age. The patients who were given streptokinase (SK) or anistreplase (APSAC) prior to more than 4 days, if necessary, urokinase or alteplase (rt-PA) should be given. There are differences in the opinions as to the optimal selection of thrombolytic drugs. However, all currently used drugs lead to a significant decrease in mortality due to AMI. The preferential use of accelerated administration of rt-PA in contrast to SK is justified in younger patients with extensive AMI of the anterior wall, in whom the therapy has begun within 4 hours since its onset. The occurence of severe bleeding indicates that TL should be halted and coagulation factors should be replaces by freshly frozen plasma or fibrinogen concentrate, if necessary, transfusion of full blood should take place. If the severe bleeding occurs shortly after the administration of SK, the persisting plasminaemia can be arranged by antifibrinolytic drugs. An improvement in TL results can be achieved by adjuvant antithrombotic therapy. At the same time, in addition to acetylsalicylic acid, the patient treated with rt-PA should be given heparin. Heparin administration is not necessary in patients treated with SK or APSAC. However, heparin is indicated in patients at risk due to systemic embolization in congestive heart disease, extensive infarction or atrial fibrillation. (Tab. 1, Ref. 28).
RESUMEN
The data gained from clinical studies in the past years have indicated that the thrombolytic therapy (TL) has favourable effect on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is aimed at reperfusion in the ischaemic area, a decrease in the extent of infarction site and a decrease in mortality. TL administered within the initial hours after the onset of AMI leads to better results than when administered after several hours. Currently, TL is not limited by age. The patients who were given streptokinase (SK) or anistreplase (APSAC) prior to more than 4 days, if necessary, urokinase or alteplase (rt-PA) should be given. There are differences in the opinions as to the optimal selection of thrombolytic drugs. However, all currently used drugs lead to a significant decrease in mortality due to AMI. The preferential use of accelerated administration of rt-PA in contrast to SK is justified in younger patients with extensive AMI of the anterior wall, in whom the therapy has begun within 4 hours since its onset. The occurrence of severe bleeding indicates that TL should be halted and coagulation factors should be replaced by freshly frozen plasma or fibrinogen concentrate, if necessary, transfusion of full blood should take place. If the severe bleeding occurs shortly after the administration of SK, the persisting plasminaemia can be arranged by antifibrinolytic drugs. An improvement in TL results can be achieved by adjuvant antithrombotic therapy. At the same time, in addition to acetylsalicylic acid, the patient treated with rt-PA should be given heparin. Heparin administration is not necessary in patients treated with SK or APSAC. However, heparin is indicated in patients at risk due to systemic embolization in congestive heart disease, extensive infarction or atrial fibrillation. (Tab. 1, Ref. 28.)