RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal operative treatment for umbilical and epigastric hernia, i.e., primary midline ventral hernia (PMVH), is debatable. The most common techniques are the primary suture and open repair with mesh, while laparoscopic approach using intraperitoneally placed onlay mesh (IPOM) is less frequent. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of IPOM in PMVH. Perioperative results, recurrence, pain, and functional status were studied. METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort study included consecutive patients with PMVH operated between September 2006 and December 2015. Systematic follow-up was conducted 6 months and 2 and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-four patients underwent PMVH repair. Open repair without mesh, open repair with mesh, and IPOM were performed in 251 (34.9%), 273 (38%), and 195 (27.1%) patients, respectively. In the unmatched cohort, the incidence of postoperative complications was similar except postoperative seroma, which was more frequent after IPOM. The latter was also associated with longer length of stay. Open repair with mesh was associated with significantly lower recurrence compared with open repair without mesh and IPOM (5.2 vs 18.2 vs 13.8%, p=0.001, respectively). No differences were seen between the groups in terms of visual analog scale used for registering postoperative pain. These observations persisted after applying propensity score matching. In the multivariable analysis, open repair without mesh and IPOM significantly correlated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In PMVH, open repair with mesh is associated with lower recurrence compared with open repair without mesh and IPOM. Pain, postoperative complications (except for seroma), and functional status are similar.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Recurrencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio , Incidencia , Seroma/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , FemeninoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and indications for unplanned readmission and outpatient examination after acute appendectomy. METHODS: Adults who underwent acute appendectomy from 2008-2013 were included in the study and events occurring within 90-days from discharge recorded. RESULTS: A total of 710 patients underwent surgery. The appendix was removed in 622 patients and post-discharge contact occurred in 99 (15.9%): readmission in 60 (9.6%), outpatient examination in 39 (6.3%). The main reasons for post-discharge contact were infection (n = 25; intraabdominal, n = 16; superficial) and abdominal pain of uncertain cause (n = 25). Use of prophylactic antibiotics was associated with lower rates of contact, 8.5% versus 20.9% (p = 0.006), respectively. Removal of non-inflamed appendix was borderline associated with higher rates of contact, 21.7% versus 8.0% (if left in-situ; p = 0.058), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients underwent readmission or outpatient examination within 90-days after appendectomy in the current study. The procedure is common and attempts to prevent readmissions are important. Correct use of antibiotics and not removing a non-inflamed appendix may be key points.