RESUMEN
The objective of this study is to characterize the standard perioperative practices of penile prosthetic surgeons. A 24-question survey was sent to prosthetic urologists which assessed surgeon demographic and practice information, preoperative evaluation including assessment of sexual history, and postoperative assessment. The majority of surveyed penile implant surgeons (87.0%) assess patients' grip strength before surgery and 96.5% discuss patients' expectations before surgery. Less than half (42.6%) ask patients about their sexual orientation. Only 49.6% obtain a psychiatric history but 68.7% evaluate the impact of sexual function on patient self-esteem. A minority (35.5%) ask about the intended use of the implant and 63.5% commonly ask about partner sexual function. Few (26.1%) implanters regularly ask about the type of sexual activity patients engage in (i.e., oral, vaginal, anal). Postoperatively, 95.6% of implanters ask about patient satisfaction but only 67.2% routinely assess partner satisfaction. Only 18.6% of implant surgeons use a questionnaire to evaluate postoperative satisfaction. Penile prosthetic urologists can improve the consistency of assessment of patients' sexual orientation, intended use of the implant, type of sexual activity, and partner sexual function and satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil , Implantación de Pene , Prótesis de Pene , Cirujanos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Pene/cirugía , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The reported disproportionate impact of COVID-19 infections on minority populations may be due to living in disinvested communities with a high level of poverty, pollution, inadequate unsafe employment, and overcrowded housing. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of county, city, and individual risk factors with COVID-19 infection rates. METHODS: Retrospective chart review on COVID-19 tests performed from March through July 2020 at Arrowhead Regional Medical Center (ARMC), Colton, California. RESULTS: A total of 7104 tests were performed with 69% in the drive-through testing center. The mean duration of test-to-results time was 2.36 (+0.02) days. COVID-19 positive tests occurred in 1095 (15.4%). At least one symptom occurred in 414 (33%) with a sensitivity of 37.8, specificity of 86.02, a positive predictive value of 33.01, and a negative predictive value of 72.76. Individual factors significantly associated with testing positive for COVID-19 were diabetes, Hispanic ethnicity, and male gender. Younger age was significantly associated with testing COVID positive with the highest risk in children <10 years. COVID-19 positive persons significantly resided in cities with higher population density, household members, poverty, non-English speaking homes, disability, lower median household income, lack of health insurance and decreased access to a computer and Wi-Fi services. County health rankings showed a significant positive association between testing positive for COVID-19 with increased smoking, air pollution, violent crimes, physical inactivity, decreased education, and access to exercise. Conclusion: Adverse county health rankings, socially and economically disadvantaged cities are associated with an increased risk of testing positive for COVD-19. This information can be used in strategic planning and invention mitigation.