RESUMEN
Since the middle of the last century, there have been amazing therapeutic advances for hemophilia such as the development of plasma-derived products and bioengineered recombinant factors VIII and IX (for hemophilia A and B, respectively) with improved stability, higher activity, and extended half-life. The recent use of a monoclonal antibody that mimics factor VIII activity (which is an efficient treatment for all hemophilia A phenotypes with or without inhibitors) has shown the great possibilities of non-factor therapies for improving the quality of life of hemophilia A patients, with a safer application and long-lasting effects. Gene therapy offers the promise of a "true cure" for hemophilia based on the permanent effect that a gene edition may render. Clinical trials developed in the last decade based on adenoviral vectors show modest but consistent results; now, CRISPR/Cas technology (which is considered the most efficient tool for gene edition) is being developed on different hemophilia models. Once the off-target risks are solved and an efficient switch on/off for Cas activity is developed, this strategy might become the most feasible option for gene therapy in hemophilia and other monogenic diseases.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas/genética , Factor IX/genética , Factor IX/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/genética , Hemofilia A/terapia , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/terapia , Humanos , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder with a prevalence of 0.1%, characterised by quantitative or functional deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD diagnosis is based on symptomology, biochemical and genetic tests, but limited laboratory resources and VWD heterogeneity still generate an important subdiagnosis gap worldwide and in our country. AIM: To identify the type and subtype of VWD in a cohort of patients with a history of excessive bleeding in Western Mexico. METHODS: This prospective cohort study from 2012 to 2019 included patients with mucocutaneous bleeding or abnormal laboratory tests. A standardised questionnaire and confirmatory tests were applied: FVIII:C, VWF activity, VWF antigen, and VWF multimeric analysis. RESULTS: Of the 297 patients recruited, 207 (69.7%) were excluded because their values exceeded 50% in VWF activity and VWF antigen. Of those 90 remaining, 54 (18.2%) had low VWF, and only 36 patients (12.1%) were diagnosed with VWD. Among them, 17 (47.2%) had quantitative deficiencies, of whom 14 were assigned as type 1 and 3 as type 3.The remaining 19 cases were diagnosed as type 2 (52.8%): type 2A and 2B were the most frequent with 6 and 7 cases respectively; 4 cases were possible type 2M and two suggestive of 2N, however, this was not confirmed. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the challenges of VWD diagnosis using a comprehensive panel of diagnostic tests which should extend to supplemental tests of VWF:CB, VWF:FVIIIB, and sequencing the VWD gene to confirm the results from the panel assays.