RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Myocardial blood flow (MBF) assessment can provide incremental diagnostic and prognostic information and thus the validation of dynamic SPECT is of high importance. We recently developed a novel cardiac phantom for dynamic SPECT validation and compared its performance against the GE Discovery NM 530c. We now report its use for validation of a new hybrid SPECT/CT System featuring advanced cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) technology in a ring array detector design (StarGuide™, GE HealthCare). METHODS: Our recently developed cardiac phantom with injected technetium-99m radiotracer was used to create physiological time activity curves (TACs) for the left ventricular (LV) cavity and the myocardium. The TACs allow the calculation of uptake rate (K1) and MBF. The StarGuide system was used to acquire and process the TACs, and these were compared to the TACs produced by the phantom and its mathematical model. Fifteen (15) experiments with different doses representing various MBF values were conducted, and a standard statistic tool was applied for significance. RESULTS: The TACs produced by the StarGuide system had a significant correlation (p < 0.001) with the reference TACs generated by the phantom both for the LV (r = 0.94) and for the myocardium (r = 0.89). The calculated MBF difference between the system and the phantom was 0.14 ± 0.16 ml/min/g and the average relative absolute difference was 13.2 ± 8.1%. A coefficient of variance of ≤ 11% was observed for all MBF subranges. The regional uptake rate values were similar to the global one with a maximum difference of 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our newly developed dynamic cardiac phantom was used for validation of the dynamic hybrid SPECT/CT CZT-based system (StarGuide™, GE). The accuracy and precision of the system for assessing MBF values were high. The new StarGuide system can reliably perform dynamic SPECT acquisitions over a wide range of myocardial perfusion flow rates.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Single-center studies have shown that single photon emission computed tomography myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurement is accurate compared with MBF measured with microspheres in a porcine model, positron emission tomography, and angiography. Clinical implementation requires consistency across multiple sites. The study goal is to determine the intersite processing repeatability of single photon emission computed tomography MBF and the additional camera time required. METHODS: Five sites (Canada, Italy, Japan, Germany, and Singapore) each acquired 25 to 35 MBF studies at rest and with pharmacological stress using technetium-99m-tetrofosmin on a pinhole-collimated cadmium-zinc-telluride-based cardiac single photon emission computed tomography camera with standardized list-mode imaging and processing protocols. Patients had intermediate to high pretest probability of coronary artery disease. MBF was measured locally and at a core laboratory using commercially available software. The time a room was occupied for an MBF study was compared with that for a standard rest/stress myocardial perfusion study. RESULTS: With motion correction, the overall correlation in MBF between core laboratory and local site was 0.93 (range, 0.87-0.97) at rest, 0.90 (range, 0.84-0.96) at stress, and 0.84 (range, 0.70-0.92) for myocardial flow reserve. The local-to-core difference in global MBF (bias-MBF) was 5.4% (-3.8% to 14.8%; median [interquartile range]) at rest and 5.4% (-6.2% to 19.4%) at stress. Between the 5 sites, bias-MBF ranged from -1.6% to 11.0% at rest and from -1.9% to 16.3% at stress; the interquartile range in bias-MBF was between 9.3% (4.8%-14.0%) and 22.3% (-10.3% to 12.0%) at rest and between 17.0% (-11.3% to 5.6%) and 33.3% (-10.4% to 22.9%) at stress and was not significantly different between most sites. Both bias and interquartile range were like previously reported interobserver variability and less than the SD of the test-retest difference of 30%. The overall difference in myocardial flow reserve was 1.52% (-10.6% to 11.3%). There were no significant differences between with and without motion correction. The average additional acquisition time varied between sites from 44 to 79 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The average bias-MBF and bias-MFR values were small with standard deviations substantially less than the test-retest variability. This demonstrates that MBF can be measured consistently across multiple sites and further supports that this technique can be reliably implemented. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03427749.