RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Up to 90% of people with dementia experience behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) as part of their illness. Psychotropics are not recommended as the first-line treatment of BPSD because older people are more prone to adverse reactions. In this study, we evaluate the impact of the Finnish clinical guidelines of BPSD (published in 2017) on psychotropic use in people with dementia. METHODS: This study is based on Finnish Prescription Register data from 2009 to 2020. The data included all community-dwelling Finnish people aged ≥65 and who had anti-dementia medication purchases (n = 217,778). We used three-phased interrupted time series design to evaluate the changes in levels and trends of monthly (n = 144) psychotropic user rates compared with the predicted trends. In addition, we evaluated the changes in levels and trends of monthly new psychotropic user rates. RESULTS: The level of monthly psychotropic user rate decreased non-significantly during the intervention period (ß -0.057, P = 0.853), and during the post-intervention period, there was an increase in the level (ß 0.443, P = 0.091) and slope (ß 0.199, P = 0.198), but not statistically significant. The level of monthly new psychotropic user rate (ß -0.009, P = 0.949) during the intervention period and the level (ß 0.044, P = 0.714) and slope (ß 0.021, P = 0.705) during the post-intervention period were almost unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Results may indicate possible challenges in deprescribing and better adherence to the guidelines at the beginning of BPSD treatment. Further research into the barriers to implement BPSD guidelines and the availability of non-pharmacological treatments is needed.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Psicotrópicos , Humanos , Anciano , Finlandia/epidemiología , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Psicotrópicos/efectos adversos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
AIMS: To evaluate the impact of the updated nationwide Meds75+ database and its linkage to the Finnish health portal on the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among older persons. We also aimed to evaluate whether there is regional variation in trend changes of PIM use. METHODS: Meds75+ was implemented at the population level in 2015, so randomization is unfeasible. We used a quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the changes in levels and trends of PIM use. The data included all Finnish community-dwelling persons aged ≥75 years (N = 920 163) who had medication purchases in the Prescription Register during 2009-2020. Data were linked with the Care Registers for Health and Social Care and the cause of death register. RESULTS: The prevalence of PIMs decreased from 20.2% in 2009 to 11.7% in 2020. The change of level of the monthly PIM users was negative (ß -0.036, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.202 to 0.131), but not statistically significant (P = .673) after the publication of the database. We found a small decrease (ß -0.018, 95% CI -0.083 to 0.047, P = .593) in the slope of PIM users, but it was not statistically significant. The regional results were similar to the main findings. CONCLUSIONS: Publication of the updated Meds75+ database did not decrease the level or trend of PIM users. In addition, this study did not show any significant regional variation in PIM use trends. Further research should focus on determining barriers and facilitators to the utilization of PIM criteria in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Finlandia/epidemiología , Causas de Muerte , Vida IndependienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Educational interventions can reduce potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older people. Their effectiveness has been measured mainly as changes in PIM use. In this economic evaluation, we analyse the impact of an educational intervention in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). METHODS: The educational intervention consisted of activating and interactive training sessions for nursing staff and consulting physicians, and was compared with treatment as usual (TAU). Participants (n = 227) in a cluster randomised trial (cRCT) were residents living permanently in assisted living facilities (n = 20 wards). For economic evaluation, participants' healthcare service use costs and costs for the intervention were estimated for a 12 month period.Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated for QALYs per participant. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from a healthcare perspective. A bootstrapped cost-effectiveness plane and one-way sensitivity analysis were undertaken to analyse the uncertainty surrounding the estimates. RESULTS: The educational intervention was estimated to be less costly and less effective in terms of QALYs than TAU at the 12 month follow-up [incremental costs -1,629, confidence interval (CI) -5,489 to 2,240; incremental effect -0.02, CI -0.06 to 0.02]. The base case ICER was >80,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: The educational intervention was estimated to be less costly and less effective in terms of QALYs compared with TAU, but the results are subject to some uncertainties. Reduction in PIM use or benefits in quality of life did not seem to translate into improvements in QALYs. Our findings emphasise the need for better understanding of the impact of decreasing PIM use on health outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Several implementation strategies can reduce potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing. Although use of PIMs has declined in recent years, it remains prevalent. Various strategies exist to improve the appropriateness of medication use. However, little is known about the processes of these different implementation strategies. This scoping review aims to investigate how the process evaluation of implementation strategies for reducing PIM prescribing in the older population has been studied. METHODS: We searched for process evaluations of implementation strategies for reducing PIM prescribing in PUBMED, SCOPUS and Web of Science published between January 2000 and November 2019 in English. We applied the following inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥65 years, validated PIM criteria, and implementation process evaluated. The review focuses on decision support for health care professionals. We described the findings of the process evaluations, and compared the authors' concepts of process evaluation of the included publications to those of Proctor et al.( 2010). RESULT: Of 9131 publications screened, 29 met our inclusion criteria. Different process evaluation conceptualizations were identified. Most process evaluations took place in the initial stages of the process (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility) and sustainability and implementation costs were seldom evaluated. None of the included publications evaluated fidelity. Multifaceted interventions were the most studied implementation strategies. Medication review was more common in acceptability evaluations, multidisciplinary interventions in adoption evaluations, and computerized systems and educational interventions in feasibility evaluations. Process evaluations were studied from the health care professionals' viewpoint in most of the included publications, but the management viewpoint was missing. DISCUSSION: The conceptualization of process evaluation in the field of PIM prescribing is indeterminate. There is also a current gap in the knowledge of sustainability and implementation costs. Clarifying the conceptualization of implementation process evaluation is essential in order to effectively translate research knowledge into practice.