RESUMEN

Background: There are still many doubts about anterior inferior crowding and indications of mandibular third molar extraction, although it is very studied subject in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perceptions of oral maxillofacial surgeons (OMFSs) and orthodontists about anterior inferior crowding and indications of mandibular third molar extraction. Material and Methods: A web-based survey was developed and sent to professionals in order to collect their opinion about the fact that third lower molars cause crowding and questions about the indication of third molars for orthodontic treatment. Descriptive analysis was performed and Chi-square or G tests were applied with a 95% confidence interval. Results: The study included a total of 218 participants, of whom 115 were OMFSs and 103 were orthodontists. The results showed that 56.5% of OMFSs and 35.0% of orthodontists believe that the lower third molars cause anterior inferior crowding (p<0.001). A total of 91.3% of OMFSs and 70.9% of orthodontists indicate the extraction of lower third molars to aid orthodontic treatment (p<0.001). Conclusions: It can be concluded that in being an oral maxillofacial surgeon, a higher odds ratio is observed to consider that lower third molars cause dental crowding compared to those who are orthodontist. The indication of exodontia of lower third molars for orthodontic treatment was more frequent among OMFSs when compared to orthodontists.(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of using two preoperative mouthwashes (0.12% chlorhexidine and 0.2% tea tree oil) on the number of colonies of oral microorganisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty participants who needed to be rehabilitated with dental implants were included in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups (chlorhexidine group and tea tree group; n = 20, each). For each group, saliva samples were collected at four different times: T0 (initially)-before using the mouthwash, T1-after 1 minute of using the mouthwash, T10-after 10 minutes of using the mouthwash, and T60-after 60 minutes of using the mouthwash. At T0 and T1, saliva samples were collected before implant placement surgery, and at T10 and T60, saliva samples were collected during surgery. In each group, one saliva sample was collected at each evaluated time point for each patient, totaling 4 saliva collections per patient. MSB agar (Mitis-Salivarius-Bacitracin) and BHI agar (Brain Heart Infusion) culture media were used in each group. Microbial colony counts were performed using a magnifying glass and recorded in CFU (colony forming units)/mL. Statistical analyses were performed using the Friedman, Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Based on MSB agar culture medium, at T0, the number of Streptococcus mutans colonies in the chlorhexidine group was significantly higher compared with the tea tree group (p <0.05; MSB agar). The chlorhexidine group showed significantly lower CFU/mL values for Streptococcus mutans at T1, T10, and T60 compared with the tea tree group (p <0.05; MSB agar). Based on BHI agar culture medium, at T0, the chlorhexidine group showed a significantly lower value of CFU/mL compared with the tea tree group (p < 0.05; BHI agar). At T1, T10, and T60, the chlorhexidine group showed significantly lower CFU/mL values compared with the tea tree group (p <0.05; BHI agar). CONCLUSION: Chlorhexidine is more indicated as a preoperative mouthwash than tea tree oil, due to its significantly more effective antimicrobial action.

RESUMEN

Third molar extraction surgery is a frequentprocedure in dentistry. Like any surgical procedure, it may lead to inflammatory responses, and postoperative pain is one of its main complications. Furthermore, temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a collective termfor several clinicalproblems involving orofacial structures. Patients withparafunction are more sensitive to mechanical stimuli such as pressure during surgical procedures. Aim: To analyze postoperative pain in patients with and without bruxism subjected to third molar extraction surgery. Materials and Method: This was an observational study including four groups with a 1:1:1:! allocation ratio, conducted following ethical approval. Patients classified as ASA I with an indication for lower third molar extraction were recruited. Bruxism was self-reported. Two surgical techniques were used: one with only forceps and levers (ST1) and another with osteotomy and odontosection (ST2). Results: Four groups (bruxism and surgical techniques) were enrolled, each with a convenience sample (n=34). Postoperative pain levels were higher in patients with than without bruxism (p<0.05). The comparison between surgical techniques showed significantly higher pain levels only on the seventh day for ST2 groups (p<0.05). Oral mucosaflap incisions did not cause significantly higher persistence and pain levels. Conclusions: Bruxism, osteotomy, and odontosection may have increased postoperative pain levels, whereas performing an oral mucosa flap did not cause significant differences. Nevertheless, these preliminary data should be interpreted carefully. Randomized controlled trials are required to reinforce the findings of this study.

A cirurgia de extragao de terceiros molares é um procedimento frequente na odontologia. Como em qualquer procedimento cirúrgico, pode levar a respostas inflamatorias. A dor pós-operatória é uma das principais complicagoes após a cirurgia de extragao de terceiros molares. Além disso, disfungao temporomandibular (DTM) é um termo coletivo para vários problemas clínicos envolvendo estruturas orofaciais. Pacientes com parafungao sao mais sensíveis a estímulos mecánicos como pressao durante procedimentos cirúrgicos. Objetivo: Analisar a dor pós-operatória em pacientes com e sem bruxismo submetidos á cirurgia de extragao de terceiros molares. Material e Método: Um estudo observacional incluindo quatro grupos com uma proporgao de alocagao de 1:1:1:1 foi realizado após aprovagao ética. Foram recrutados pacientes classificados como ASA I com indicagao de exodontia de terceiros molares inferiores. O bruxismo foi autorreferido e foram realizadas duas técnicas cirúrgicas: uma com apenas fórceps e alavancas (ST1) e outra com osteotomia e odontosecgao (ST2). Resultados: Foram incluidos quatro grupos (bruxismo e técnicas cirúrgicas), cada um com uma amostra de conveniencia (n=34). Os níveis de dor pós-operatória foram maiores em pacientes com bruxismo (p<0,05). A comparagao entre as técnicas cirúrgicas mostrou níveis de dor significativamente maiores apenas no sétimo diapara os grupos ST2 (p<0,05). Incisoes de retalhos de mucosa oral nao mostraram níveis de dor significativamente maiores. Conclusoes: Bruxismo, osteotomia e odontosecgaopodem aumentar os níveis de dor pós-operatória, enquanto a realizagao de retalho de mucosa oral nao apresenta diferengas significativas. No entanto, a interpretagao cuidadosa desses dados preliminares é recomendada, e ensaios clínicos randomizados sao necessários para fortalecer os achados deste estudo.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Third molar extraction surgery is a frequentprocedure in dentistry. Like any surgical procedure, it may lead to inflammatory responses, and postoperative pain is one of its main complications. Furthermore, temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a collective termfor several clinicalproblems involving orofacial structures. Patients withparafunction are more sensitive to mechanical stimuli such as pressure during surgical procedures. Aim: To analyze postoperative pain in patients with and without bruxism subjected to third molar extraction surgery. Materials and Method: This was an observational study including four groups with a 1:1:1:! allocation ratio, conducted following ethical approval. Patients classified as ASA I with an indication for lower third molar extraction were recruited. Bruxism was self-reported. Two surgical techniques were used: one with only forceps and levers (ST1) and another with osteotomy and odontosection (ST2). Results: Four groups (bruxism and surgical techniques) were enrolled, each with a convenience sample (n=34). Postoperative pain levels were higher in patients with than without bruxism (p<0.05). The comparison between surgical techniques showed significantly higher pain levels only on the seventh day for ST2 groups (p<0.05). Oral mucosaflap incisions did not cause significantly higher persistence and pain levels. Conclusions: Bruxism, osteotomy, and odontosection may have increased postoperative pain levels, whereas performing an oral mucosa flap did not cause significant differences. Nevertheless, these preliminary data should be interpreted carefully. Randomized controlled trials are required to reinforce the findings of this study.

RESUMO A cirurgia de extragao de terceiros molares é um procedimento frequente na odontologia. Como em qualquer procedimento cirúrgico, pode levar a respostas inflamatorias. A dor pós-operatória é uma das principais complicagoes após a cirurgia de extragao de terceiros molares. Além disso, disfungao temporomandibular (DTM) é um termo coletivo para vários problemas clínicos envolvendo estruturas orofaciais. Pacientes com parafungao sao mais sensíveis a estímulos mecánicos como pressao durante procedimentos cirúrgicos. Objetivo: Analisar a dor pós-operatória em pacientes com e sem bruxismo submetidos á cirurgia de extragao de terceiros molares. Material e Método: Um estudo observacional incluindo quatro grupos com uma proporgao de alocagao de 1:1:1:1 foi realizado após aprovagao ética. Foram recrutados pacientes classificados como ASA I com indicagao de exodontia de terceiros molares inferiores. O bruxismo foi autorreferido e foram realizadas duas técnicas cirúrgicas: uma com apenas fórceps e alavancas (ST1) e outra com osteotomia e odontosecgao (ST2). Resultados: Foram incluidos quatro grupos (bruxismo e técnicas cirúrgicas), cada um com uma amostra de conveniencia (n=34). Os níveis de dor pós-operatória foram maiores em pacientes com bruxismo (p<0,05). A comparagao entre as técnicas cirúrgicas mostrou níveis de dor significativamente maiores apenas no sétimo diapara os grupos ST2 (p<0,05). Incisoes de retalhos de mucosa oral nao mostraram níveis de dor significativamente maiores. Conclusoes: Bruxismo, osteotomia e odontosecgaopodem aumentar os níveis de dor pós-operatória, enquanto a realizagao de retalho de mucosa oral nao apresenta diferengas significativas. No entanto, a interpretagao cuidadosa desses dados preliminares é recomendada, e ensaios clínicos randomizados sao necessários para fortalecer os achados deste estudo.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the intensity, location, and short-term impact of the periodontal discomfort/pain, as well as the related functional parameters of bite force and masticatory efficiency, between self-ligating and conventional orthodontic appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 patients referred for orthodontic treatment, samples were collected from the gingival sulcus to evaluate the level of substance P using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Orthodontic devices were randomly bonded, with self-ligating appliances on one side and conventional brackets on the contralateral side. Pain threshold (PT), maximal bite force (MBF), and masticatory efficiency (ME) were assessed using standard validated techniques at the beginning of the treatment and 24 hours post-orthodontic activation with an 0.016-inch nickel-titanium wire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences (P > .05) in the substance P levels, PT, MBF, and ME between the self-ligating and conventional orthodontic appliances. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between conventional and self-ligating appliances in the parameters of pain: substance P and pressure. Functional aspects, such as pain, discomfort, and masticatory efficiency, should not be considered when making a therapeutic decision regarding the use of self-ligating vs conventional orthodontic appliances.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this scoping review was to analyze the available evidence on the preheating process and its effects on physicochemical properties of composite resins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in August 2021 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases and gray literature without language or date restriction. Inclusion criteria were in vitro studies that assessed the physicochemical properties and marginal adaptation of preheated composite. Exclusion criteria were studies with experimental composite, literature reviews, clinical studies. Data from selected studies were qualitatively analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 104 studies were found from which 39 were included. The most used composite resin was Filtek Z350 XT (3 M/ESPE), preheated at 68°C in a Calset device (AdDent Inc., Danbury, CT, USA) for 5 or 15 min. Most studies showed decreased viscosity, increased conversion degree and microhardness of composite resins, and better marginal adaptation of direct and indirect restorations. Also, flexural strength was not affected, and data about bond strength were inconclusive due to heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSION: The parameters used for preheating composite resins are heterogeneous. Preheating decreased viscosity, increased the conversion degree and microhardness of composite resins, and improved the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The analysis of evidence showed a high heterogeneity among preheating protocols. Preheating may benefit the handling and physicochemical properties of composite resins.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the postoperative effects of the piezoelectric device and conventional rotary instruments in Schneider's membrane sinus lifting procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients requiring bilateral maxillary bone graft augmentation in the posterior maxillary region were selected. Piezoelectric surgery was performed on one side and conventional surgery with a rotary diamond bur on the other. Postoperative pain, swelling, edema, and mouth opening were evaluated at one hour and two and seven days after the procedures. All variables were submitted to Friedman or Wilcoxon tests at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: The comparison between groups showed that postoperative pain after one hour and two days was significantly lower (p< 0.05) in the piezoelectric device group. Regarding the edema, the results of both techniques were similar at all times assessed (p> 0.05). Piezosurgery was statistically associated (p< 0.05) with greater mouth opening only at the 48-hour evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Osteotomy with a piezoelectric device causes less pain and greater mouth opening postoperatively compared with the conventional technique. Key words:Piezosurgery, sinus lift, edema, pain, rotative instruments.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of evidence about the use of local anaesthetics (LAs) in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in dental procedures. Thus, this study evaluated the safety of using LA with vasoconstrictor to determine the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with CVD. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We have searched in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Healthstar (via Ovid), CINAHL, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to January 2020. We have included RCTs involving adults with CVD within two groups: intervention group with LA with vasoconstrictor and control group with LA without vasoconstrictor. The primary outcomes assessed were death, mortality by a specific cause, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, hospitalisation, pain, bleeding and arrhythmias. The secondary outcomes were ST segment depression, anxiety, adverse effects and changes in haemodynamic parameters. The data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses and the confidence in the estimates was verified using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Ten RCTs (n=478 participants) were included. Most of them had a high risk of bias. There were more cases of pain and bleeding in groups without vasoconstrictor. Meta-analysis demonstrated a decrease in the systolic blood pressure with the use of LA with vasoconstrictor (standard mean difference -0.95, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.55) after procedure. Overall, for the other outcomes assessed there was no statistical difference. The quality of evidence was considered low according to the GRADE profile. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the use of LA with vasoconstrictors (epinephrine in low doses) is safe in patients with some types of CVD. However, the low quality of evidence demonstrated that literature needs further studies in order to confirm these results. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42016045421).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study aimed to systematically review the literature to assess the effect of preemptive intravenous ibuprofen on pain reduction after lower third molar surgery. Nine databases (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Open Gray, and Open Thesis) were used as sources of research, including "grey literature." The protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Only randomized clinical trials evaluating the effects of preemptive intravenous ibuprofen on pain during and immediately after the extraction of lower third molars were included, without restrictions of year and language. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and assessment of the risk of bias. The "Joanna Briggs Institute for Randomized Controlled Trials" tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Each study was categorized according to the percentage of positive responses to the questions corresponding to the assessment instrument. The results were measured narratively/descriptively. The initial search resulted in 3,257 records, of which only three studies (n=150 participants) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. All studies were published in 2019. The risk of bias ranged from low to moderate. Two studies found significant pain reduction within 48 h after the procedure. In conclusion, the use of preemptive intravenous ibuprofen for extracting third molars reduces pain and analgesic consumption after the surgical procedure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study aimed to evaluate possible changes in final retention after nine sequences of insertion and removal (SIR) of a frictional Morse taper implant/abutment system, evaluating the force required for dissociating this set between sequences, and verifying possible deformations in the implant heads. Ten implants, 13 mm long and 3.3 mm in diameter, were coupled to a universal mechanical testing machine. Ten anti-rotational abutments, 13 mm long and 3.5 mm in diameter, were connected to the implants parallel to the long axis, using an instrument called beat-connection, and subjected to tensile tests and SEM analysis. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-test, and the significance level was set at 5 %. There was no statistically significant difference in final retention among the nine SIRs evaluated. The force needed to uncouple the abutment from the implant increased as SIRs were performed on all ten implants, and an increase of 29.03 % was observed in the ninth SIR compared to the first SIR. After SEM analysis, no significant deformations, fractures, or cracks were observed in the implant heads.

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar los posibles cambios en la retención final después de nueve secuencias de inserción y extracción (SIR) de un sistema de implante / pilar de cono de fricción Morse, evaluando la fuerza necesaria para disociar este conjunto entre secuencias y verificando posibles deformaciones en las cabezas de los implantes. Se acoplaron diez implantes, de 13 mm de largo y 3,3 mm de diámetro, a una máquina universal de ensayos mecánicos. Se conectaron a los implantes en paralelo al eje largo diez pilares antirrotacionales, de 13 mm de largo y 3,5 mm de diámetro, mediante un instrumento llamado beat-connection, y se sometieron a pruebas de tracción y análisis SEM. Los resultados se analizaron mediante la prueba de Kruskal-Wallis con la prueba posterior de Dunn, y el nivel de significancia se estableció en 5 %. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la retención final entre los nueve SIR evaluados. La fuerza necesaria para desacoplar el pilar del implante aumentó a medida que se realizaban SIR en los diez implantes, y se observó un aumento del 29,03 % en el noveno SIR en comparación con el primer SIR. Después del análisis SEM, no se observaron deformaciones, fracturas o grietas significativas en las cabezas de los implantes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the course of anxiety and pain during lower third molar (LTMo) surgery and explore the role of mobile and single-channel electroencephalography under clinical and surgical conditions. METHODS: The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS), and Interval Scale of Anxiety Response (ISAR) were used. The patient self-rated anxiety (PSA), the pain felt during and after surgery, EEG, heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) were assessed. RESULTS: The Attention (ATT) and Meditation (MED) algorithms and indicators evaluated in this study showed several associations. ATT showed interactions and an association with STAI-S, pain during surgery, PSA level, HR, and surgical duration. MED showed an interaction and association with DAS, STAI-S, and pain due to anesthesia. Preclinical anxiety parameters may influence clinical perceptions and biological parameters during LTMo surgeries. High STAI-Trait and PSA scores were associated with postoperative pain, whereas high STAI-State scores were associated with more pain during anesthesia and surgery, as well as DAS, which was also associated with patient interference during surgery due to anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that single-channel EEG is promising for evaluating brain responses associated with systemic reactions related to anxiety, surgical stress, and pain during oral surgery.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: It can be challenging to manage patients who are anxious during dental procedures. There is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adults. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in patients undergoing dental procedures. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) compared the oral use of benzodiazepines and other medications with a placebo or other oral agents in adult patients. A search of the Cochrane (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via Ovid) databases was conducted, without any restrictions on language or date of publication. The primary outcomes included the adverse effects and anxiety level. The secondary outcomes included sedation, satisfaction with the treatment, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. Reviewers, independently and in pairs, assessed each citation for eligibility, performed the data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. A narrative synthesis of the data was provided. RESULTS: A number of RCTs (n=327 patients) assessed the use of benzodiazepines (n=9) and herbal medicines (n=3). We found good satisfaction with treatment after the use of midazolam 7.5 mg or clonidine 150 µg and reduced anxiety with alprazolam (0.5 and 0.75 mg). Midazolam 15 mg promoted greater anxiety reduction than Passiflora incarnata L. 260 mg, while Valeriana officinalis 100 mg and Erythrina mulungu 500 mg were more effective than a placebo. More patients reported adverse effects with midazolam 15 mg. Diazepam 15 mg and V. officinalis 100 mg promoted less change in the heart rate and blood pressure than a placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Given the limitations of the findings due to the quality of the included studies and the different comparisons made between interventions, further RCTs are required to confirm the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in dentistry. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017057142.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study aimed to systematically review the literature to assess the effect of preemptive intravenous ibuprofen on pain reduction after lower third molar surgery. Nine databases (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Open Gray, and Open Thesis) were used as sources of research, including "grey literature." The protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Only randomized clinical trials evaluating the effects of preemptive intravenous ibuprofen on pain during and immediately after the extraction of lower third molars were included, without restrictions of year and language. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and assessment of the risk of bias. The "Joanna Briggs Institute for Randomized Controlled Trials" tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Each study was categorized according to the percentage of positive responses to the questions corresponding to the assessment instrument. The results were measured narratively/descriptively. The initial search resulted in 3,257 records, of which only three studies (n=150 participants) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. All studies were published in 2019. The risk of bias ranged from low to moderate. Two studies found significant pain reduction within 48 h after the procedure. In conclusion, the use of preemptive intravenous ibuprofen for extracting third molars reduces pain and analgesic consumption after the surgical procedure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to assess the stresses produced on the surface of the bone tissue around dental implants with three different insertion angulations subjected to axial and oblique loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was created according to the recommendations of the Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies (CRIS). The Straumann™ bone level RC (4.1 x 10 mm) implant, Cone Morse connection (CM), RC Straumann Variobase™ with abutment (3.5 mm) was placed in the region of element 16, with the platform positioned at the height of the bone crest. Three assessment models were produced: model M1 or control - implant perpendicular to the bone crest; model M2 - implant angulated at 17° relative to the bone crest; and model M3 - implant angulated at 30° relative to the bone crest. The masticatory loads were simulated with 100 N of intensity and two loading patterns (axial and oblique) were applied to each model. Then, the models were exported to the finite elements simulation software Ansys Workbench V19.2 (Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA). To assess the finite elements, qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: It was observed that, under axial loading, qualitatively, the peaks occurred in the cavosurface region, palatal aspect in M1 and M2, and buccal aspect in M3. Quantitatively, the greatest angulation resulted in a low stress peak. Under oblique loading, qualitatively, the peaks occurred in the cavosurface region, buccal aspect in the three groups. Quantitatively, the greatest angulation of the implant resulted in an increase in stress peaks on the buccal aspect. CONCLUSIONS: Under axial loading, the three insertion angulations of the implant - M1, M2, and M3 - were clinically viable. When subjected to oblique loading, the 30° angulation (M3) suggested a significant risk of bone loss and it was contraindicated. Key words:Finite element analysis, dental implants, load support.

RESUMEN

Resumo Introdução: Na busca do controle de ancoragem e da biomecânica ideal, surgem opções terapêuticas que associam ancoragem óssea e dispositivos biomecânicos. Os mini-implantes ortodônticos vieram constituir de maneira definitiva, um eficiente método de ancoragem, que são utilizados para otimização de resultados com mecânicas mais simples. O presente trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar um caso clínico de Classe III em paciente adulto tratado com o uso de uma Placa Versátil de Ancoragem Esquelética (PVAE) apoiada sobre mini-implantes instalados no palato e minimplantes instalados na região posterior da mandíbula. Resultados: Após 11 meses de tratamento, a mordida cruzada anterior foi completamente corrigida e um relacionamento molar e canino Classe I foi alcançado. Houve uma melhora significativa no perfil do paciente, mostram dose uma face harmoniosa e um perfil facial agradável. Conclusões: A combinação do uso da Placa Versátil de Ancoragem Esquelética no palato, mini-implantes na região posterior da mandíbula e da Ortodontia Lingual, para casos compensatórios de Classe III, mostrou ser uma opção viável. (AU)

Abstract Introduction: In the search for anchorage control and optimal biomechanics, therapeutic options arise that associate bone anchorage and biomechanical devices. The orthodontic mini-implants came to be a definitive method, an efficient anchoring method, which are used to optimize results with simpler mechanics. The present study aims to present a Class III clinical case in an adult patient treated with a Versatile Skeletal Anchoring Plate (PVAE) supported on mini-implants installed on the palate and minimplants installed in the posterior region of the mandible. Results: After 11 months of treatment, the anterior cross bite was completely corrected and a Class I molar and canine relationship was achieved. There was a significant improvement in the patient's profile, showing a harmonious face and a pleasant facial profile. Conclusions: The combination of the use of the Versatile Skeletal Anchoring Plate in the palate, mini-implants in the posterior mandible and Lingual Orthodontics, for Class III compensatory cases, was shown to be a viable option. (AU)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar diferentes estratégias para o aprimoramento de graduandos de Odontologia sobre normas de prescrição medicamentosa. Foram avaliados 72 estudantes, os quais foram divididos aleatoriamente em 3 grupos (n=24): Grupo 1 ­ em cada etapa de avaliação foi apresentado um vídeo explicativo sobre normas de prescrição com duração de 15 minutos; Grupo 2 ­ o mesmo vídeo foi disponibilizado em uma plataforma virtual (com acesso ilimitado); Grupo 3 ­ controle: os estudantes não tiveram atividades adicionais sobre o tema. Foram realizadas 4 avaliações e os voluntários receberam um caso clínico diferente em cada avaliação, realizando uma prescrição para a situação clínica proposta. Para cada prescrição realizada foi atribuída uma pontuação considerando diferentes itens: identificação do profissional e do paciente, concentração, dose e quantidade do medicamento, instruções, dentre outros. Os resultados obtidos foram submetidos à análise estatística, com nível de significância de 5%. Não foram observadas diferenças significativas na avaliação basal entre os grupos (p>0,05). Após o uso das diferentes estratégias foram observados melhores resultados para G1 quando comparados a G2 e G3 (p<0,05). Concluiuse que o uso do vídeo presencial foi o que proporcionou melhores resultados em relação às normas de prescrição de medicamentos (AU).

The aim of this study was to evaluate different teaching strategies to improve the knowledge of dental students about prescribing standards. We evaluated 72 students who were randomly separated into 3 groups (n = 24): Group 1 - at each evaluation stage, an explanatory video about prescription rules was presented; Group 2 - the same video was made available on a virtual platform (with unlimited access); Group 3 - control: the students did not have additional activities on the subject. During the study period 4 evaluations were performed, and all participants received a different clinical case to carry out a prescription for the proposed clinical situation. For each prescription performed, a score was given to different items: identification of professional and patient, concentration, dosage and quantity of the medicine, instructions, among others. The results were submitted to statistical analysis and the level of significance was set at 5%. No significant differences were observed at baseline between groups (p> 0.05). However, after using the strategies better results were observed for G1 when compared with G2 and G3 (p<0.05). It could be concluded that among the strategies used, the use of video was the one that provided an improvement in knowledge of dental students in relation to prescribing standards (AU).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Os cirurgiões-dentistas devem estar preparados para eventuais situações de emergências médicas que podem ocorrer durante o atendimento odontológico. Entretanto, muitos profissionais não se sentem preparados para executar estes procedimentos e têm pouca experiência em treinamentos práticos. Desta forma, o objetivo deste artigo é relatar a experiência de uma atividade de simulação em diferentes cenários de emergências médicas na prática odontológica. Esta metodologia envolve o uso de um simulador de alta fidelidade e permite a discussão na sala de debriefing sobre os principais procedimentos e treinamento prático para o manejo de emergências médicas. A simulação de alta fidelidade realística para o ensino de emergências médicas na prática odontológica representa um cenário inovador e é eficaz para o processo de ensino e aprendizagem (AU).

Dentists should be prepared to manage eventual medical emergencies that occur in the dental practice. However, many dentists are not fully prepared to manage these situations and have insufficient experience training in medical emergencies. The aim of this paper is to report the experience of educational activities using a high-fidelity simulator in different scenarios in order to prepare dental professionals for medical emergencies in the dental clinic. This methodology allows discussion in the debriefing room regarding the main techniques and procedures to be performed in clinical practice in cases of emergencies and training of dentists to meet these situations. It can be concluded that high-fidelity simulation represents an innovative learning scenario and it is an effective educational method to prepare dental professionals for medical emergencies (AU).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare two therapeutic protocols of dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative swelling, pain, and other complications after the extraction of impacted third molars, in a prospective, randomized, crossover, double-blinded clinical trial. METHODS: Fifty patients with symmetrical impaction of third molars were randomly assigned to two different protocols of dexamethasone for each side. Patients underwent two sessions performed at a 21-day interval. In group 1, patients took 8 mg of dexamethasone orally 1 h before the procedure, and in group 2, 4 mg dexamethasone orally 1 h before and 24 h after the procedure. Surgery duration, volume of local anesthetics, surgical technique, and rescue medication were standardized. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) at predefined times: before operation; immediately after; 1, 2, 4, and 12 h; and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days after operation. The patients were also instructed to take notes of the number of rescue medication tablets taken. Edema and mouth opening were clinically evaluated before surgery and in the postoperative period (second and seventh postoperative days). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups for VAS scales (p = 0.5048), but the use of rescue medication was significantly lower in group 1 (p = 0.006). None statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between groups in any of the time points for all measurements of edema. However, the mouth opening limitation (DIINC) was bigger (p = 0.0069) for group 1 at 2 days. CONCLUSION: Pre-emptive use of different dexamethasone regimens had a beneficial effect against pain, edema, and mouth opening limitation, especially when administered at an 8 mg concentration, which suggests that this protocol may also be efficient for more invasive surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of subcutaneous injection nicotine in osseointegration process on different implant surfaces. METHODS: Twenty-two male rabbits were distributed into two groups according to the subcutaneous injections: (1) nicotine 3 mg/day/kg and (2) 0.9 % NaCI 3 mL/day/kg, three times a day; subgroups were then designated-machined and anodized implants were placed in the right and left tibia bones, respectively. The animals were submitted euthanasia after periods of eight weeks to determine nicotine and cotinine levels, alkaline phosphatase and biomechanical analysis. RESULTS: The plasmatic levels of nicotine and cotinine were 0.5 ± 0.28 ng/mL and 9.5 ± 6.51 ng/mL, respectively. The alkaline phosphatase analyses in blood levels in control group were observed 40.8 ± 11.88 UI/L and 40.75 ± 12.46 UI/L, for the surfaces machined and anodized, respectively. In the test group was observed levels 37.9 ± 4.84 UI/L, for both implant surfaces. No significant differences were observed between control and test groups and between the implant surfaces regarding alkaline phosphatase blood levels. For biomechanics, no significant differences were observed in control group between the machined (25±8.46 Ncm) or anodized (31.2 ± 6.76 Ncm) implants. However, the treatment with nicotine induced higher torque than control in both machined (38.3 ± 13.52 Ncm) and anodized (35.5 ± 14.17 Ncm) implants, with p = 0.0024 and p = 0.0121, respectively. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous injection of nicotine following implant insertion didn't have effect on osseointegration, independently from the implant surface.

Asunto(s)