RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This analysis of the REMATCH Trial focuses on infection, which was an important source of morbidity and mortality. We use the information to suggest ways to decrease the incidence and effects of device-related infection. METHODS: Patients were randomized prospectively to receive left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) or optimal medical management (OMM) for end-stage heart failure. Infection variables included sepsis adjudicated as the cause of death; sepsis reported as a serious adverse event; percutaneous site or pocket infection; and pump housing, inflow- or outflow-tract infection. We compared the incidence and prevalence of events between groups and generated time-related descriptions. RESULTS: Survival with LVAD (n=68 patients) was superior to OMM survival (n=61 patients) with a 47% decrease in risk of death (p <0.001), but the aggregate adverse event rate was greater for patients with LVADs (risk ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.84). Freedom from sepsis in patients with LVADs was 58% at 1 year and 48% at 2 years after implantation with superior survival in non-septic patients (60% vs 39% at 1 year and 38% vs 8% at 2 years in non-septic vs septic patients with LVADs, p <0.06). Percutaneous site or pocket infection did not affect survival (p=0.86). The hazard for onset of sepsis peaked within the first 3 weeks after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Survival is improved with permanent LVAD implantation compared with OMM therapy. However, infection causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Decreasing infections will increase survival and decrease morbidity in permanent LVAD recipients and will improve the risk-benefit ratio for permanent LVAD therapy.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Infecciones/etiología , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Humanos , Sepsis/etiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The donor shortage makes cardiac transplantation a less than ideal treatment for end-stage heart failure. The utility of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a permanent form of circulatory support has recently been established in the REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure) trial. In this report, we describe the surgical management of LVAD patients in REMATCH and their short-term outcomes. Between 1998 and 2001, 129 patients with end-stage heart failure, who were excluded from consideration for transplantation, were enrolled in the REMATCH clinical trial. Patients were randomized to two treatment arms: optimal medical management or HeartMate vented electric LVAD implantation. The primary end point of the study was death from any cause. Secondary end points included the incidence of serious adverse events, the duration of hospitalization, quality of life, and functional status. Sixty-eight patients received an LVAD, 55 (81%) of whom survived for longer than 1 month. The median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) for those that survived at least 1 month were 15 and 34 days, respectively. Sixty-seven (99%) patients had a serious adverse event. The rates of perioperative bleeding, late bleeding, right heart failure, and sepsis were 0.42, 0.53, 0.15, and 0.53 events/patient-year, respectively. Factors predictive of a longer LOS for the implant hospitalization included sepsis, age, and late bleeding (p < 0.0001). The patients' New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly at 1 month compared with base line (p < 0.001). Functional class improved in LVAD-supported patients despite a high adverse event rate. Most adverse events occurred within 30 days of device implantation. Sepsis, age, and late bleeding were the major determinants of LOS.