RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Indeterminate thyroid nodules with Hürthle cell cytology remain a diagnostic challenge. The low benign call rate and positive predictive value of first-generation molecular tests precluded their use to rule out malignancy. We examined the diagnostic performance of current tests. METHOD: This subset analysis of our prospective randomized trial compared the benign call rate and positive predictive value of Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier and Thyroseq v3 in Bethesda III and IV nodules with Hürthle cell cytology. Molecular test samples were obtained at initial fine-needle aspiration (8/2017-7/2022) and reflexively sent for processing. RESULTS: Molecular testing was performed on 140 Hürthle cell nodules. Of 79 nodules tested with the Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier, the benign call rate was 84% (66/79). Nine of 66 nodules with benign results were resected, with no malignancies. Twelve of 13 nodules with suspicious results were resected, revealing 3 malignancies-2 papillary thyroid carcinomas and one Hürthle cell carcinoma (positive predictive value 25%). Of 61 nodules tested with Thyroseq v3, the benign call rate was 56% (34/61; (P < .01 versus Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier). Five of 34 nodules with negative results were resected, with no malignancies. Nineteen of 27 nodules with positive results were resected, revealing 3 malignancies-2 papillary thyroid carcinomas and 1 Hürthle cell carcinoma (positive predictive value 16%). CONCLUSION: The high benign call rate of current molecular tests in Hürthle cell nodules strengthens their value in enabling patients to avoid surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Nódulo Tiroideo , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Células Oxífilas/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Cáncer Papilar Tiroideo/patología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/genética , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico , Nódulo Tiroideo/genética , Nódulo Tiroideo/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine the origin, current progress, and future directions of molecular testing in indeterminate Bethesda III and Bethesda IV thyroid nodules. RECENT FINDINGS: The diagnostic performance of current genomic tests shows improved benign call rates, specificity and positive-predictive values over prior test versions. The choice of test platform for clinical use should consider test performance, institutional rate of malignancy, nodule cytology and the potential for prognostication to help guide decision-making. Current challenges include test reliability, defining the optimal duration of surveillance, and improving test performance in challenging cytology, such as oncocytic nodules and NIFTP. Opportunities also remain to optimize cost-effectiveness across multiple clinical and practice settings and to refine the use of molecular testing for dynamic risk stratification, such as with BRAF V600E mutation testing. SUMMARY: Molecular testing of indeterminate thyroid nodules has helped to reduce the burden of diagnostic surgery, associated healthcare costs, and potential complications. Current-generation tests have demonstrated improvement in diagnostic performance, but challenges remain in improving test performance and refining the scope of testing in care. Decision-making for the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules should consider cytology, clinical and sonographic features, patient values and preferences and molecular testing results, whenever available.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Nódulo Tiroideo , Humanos , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico , Nódulo Tiroideo/genética , Nódulo Tiroideo/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Ultrasonografía , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/genética , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Molecular testing has improved risk stratification and increased nonoperative management for patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules, but data on the long-term outcomes of current molecular tests Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier (GSC) and Thyroseq v3 are limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of delayed operation and the false negative rate of the Afirma GSC and Thyroseq v3 in Bethesda III and IV thyroid nodules. METHODS: Prospective follow-up of a single center, randomized, clinical trial comparing the performance of Afirma GSC and Thyroseq v3 in the diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Consecutive participants who underwent thyroid biopsy in the UCLA health system with Bethesda III and IV cytology from August 2017 to November 2019. The main outcome measure was false negative rate of molecular testing. RESULTS: Of 176 indeterminate nodules with negative or benign molecular test results, 14 (8%) nodules underwent immediate resection, with no malignancies found on surgical pathology. Nonoperative management with active surveillance was pursued for 162 (92%) nodules with benign or negative test results. The median surveillance was 34 months (range 12-60 months), and 44 patients were lost to follow-up. Of 15 nodules resected during surveillance, 1 malignancy was found (overall false negative rate of 0.6%). This was a 2.7 cm minimally invasive Hurthle cell carcinoma that initially tested negative with Thyroseq v3 and underwent delayed resection due to sonographic growth during surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules with negative or benign molecular test results are stable over 3 years of follow-up. These findings support the high sensitivity of current molecular tests and their role in ruling out malignancy in indeterminate thyroid nodules.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Nódulo Tiroideo , Humanos , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico , Nódulo Tiroideo/genética , Nódulo Tiroideo/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Biopsia , Citodiagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prolonged central vascular access is a source of significant morbidity in children with intestinal failure (IF). In an effort to decrease morbidity, our multidisciplinary IF team has primarily used peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for these patients. We compared outcomes of PICCs to Broviacs®. METHODS: A review of children with IF (2006-2018) at an academic children's hospital was conducted. INCLUSION CRITERIA: total parenteral nutrition duration >42â¯days or small bowel lengthâ¯<â¯25% of total for gestational age. Complications/1000 catheter days were extracted, and a Poisson model was used to compare complications between PICCs and Broviacs®. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with IF were included, accounting for 19,452 catheter days. There were 209 PICCs (1.2-4F) and 39 Broviacs® (2.7-7F). The median duration of overall PICC access/patient was 166â¯days (range: 35â¯days-8â¯years). Incidences of central line associated blood stream infection and venous thrombosis were 3.95 and 0.55 per 1000 catheter days, respectively. There were no significant differences in complication rates per line per catheter day between PICCs and Broviacs® on multivariate analysis. Broviacs® showed a trend towards increased of catheter-related hospital admissions when compared to PICCs. CONCLUSIONS: PICCs in children with intestinal failure have similar complication rates to Broviacs® but may reduce catheter-related hospital admissions. Use of tunneled PICCs and increasing experience with this vascular access method may allow it to realize its potential advantages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study, level III.