Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 50(4): 378-384, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38015419

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes of simultaneous accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) with intrastromal corneal ring segments (CXL-ICRS) with simultaneous accelerated CXL with topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (CXL-TG-PRK) in progressive keratoconus (KC). SETTING: Kensington Eye Institute and Bochner Eye Institute, Toronto, Canada. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized interventional study. METHODS: The change in visual and topographical outcomes of CXL-ICRS and CXL-TG-PRK 4 to 5 years postoperatively were compared using linear regression models adjusted for preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax). RESULTS: 57 eyes of 43 patients with progressive KC who underwent simultaneous accelerated (9 mW/cm 2 , 10 minutes) CXL-ICRS (n = 32) and CXL-TG-PRK (n = 25) were included. Mean follow-up duration was 51.28 (9.58) and 54.57 (5.81) months for the CXL-ICRS and CXL-TG-PRK groups, respectively. Initial mean Kmax was higher in the CXL-ICRS group compared with the CXL-TG-PRK group (60.68 ± 6.81 diopters [D] vs 57.15 ± 4.19 D, P = .02). At the last follow-up, change (improvement) in logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared with that preoperatively was significant with CXL-ICRS (-0.31 ± 0.27, P < .001, which is equivalent to approximately 3 lines) and not significant with CXL-TG-PRK (-0.06 ± 0.42, P = .43). The logMAR CDVA improved significantly with CXL-ICRS (-0.22 ± 0.20, P < .001), but not with CXL-TG-PRK (-0.05 ± 0.22, P = .25). Adjusting for baseline Kmax and CDVA, the improvement in UDVA was significantly greater with CXL-ICRS than with CXL-TG-PRK (-0.27, 95% CI, 0.06-0.47, P = .01). Improvement in CDVA was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of progressive KC with long-term follow-up, UDVA showed more improvement with accelerated CXL-ICRS than with CXL-TG-PRK.


Asunto(s)
Queratocono , Refracción Ocular , Humanos , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Riboflavina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia Combinada , Sustancia Propia/cirugía , Topografía de la Córnea , Queratocono/tratamiento farmacológico , Queratocono/cirugía , Reactivos de Enlaces Cruzados/uso terapéutico
2.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 2022 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36463966

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the visual outcomes of KAMRA (AcuFocus Inc, Irvine, Calif.) inlay insertion in a cohort of patients reporting success of procedure, complications, patient satisfaction, and refractive outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective trial at the TLC Laser Centre, Toronto. METHODS: A total of 5 surgeons at the practice inserted 35 KAMRA inlays in 35 patients between October 2012 and June 2014. Some patients had a sole KAMRA inlay insertion, whereas others had combined laser vision correction (LVC) and KAMRA inlay on either the same day or sequentially. There was a small cohort of patients who had previous unrelated LVC. Mean time of follow-up was 299 days. RESULTS: After KAMRA inlay insertion there was a significant improvement in uncorrected near visual acuity (p = 0.00009), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (p = 0.00006), and uncorrected distance visual acuity (p = 0.02), but levels of patient dissatisfaction were 43%. The most common cause for dissatisfaction was requirements for readers (23%), followed by dysphotopsias (11%). The explantation rate was 11.42%, and 28.5% of patients required enhancements after inlay insertion. CONCLUSIONS: The KAMRA corneal inlay has significant improvements in uncorrected near visual acuity, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, and uncorrected distance visual acuity when used in isolation or combined with LVC. Appropriate patient selection is crucial. This procedure should not be used as first-line presbyopia management because of low levels of patient satisfaction, biocompatibility concerns, and explantation rates.

3.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 46(2): 276-286, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32126042

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) alone, CXL with simultaneous intrastromal corneal ring segments (CXL-ICRS), and CXL with simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (CXL-TG-PRK) in progressive keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), or laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)-induced ectasia. SETTING: The Kensington Eye Institute and Bochner Eye Institute, Toronto, Canada. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized interventional study. METHODS: Visual and topographical outcomes using a comparative analysis adjusting for preoperative maximum keratometry (Kmax) were evaluated 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-two eyes from 375 patients with progressive keratoconus, PMD, or LASIK-induced ectasia that underwent accelerated (9 mW/cm, 10 minutes) CXL alone (n = 204), CXL-ICRS (n = 126), or CXL-TG-PRK (n = 122) were included. Change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution uncorrected distance visual acuity was significant with CXL-ICRS (-0.31; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.24) and CXL-TG-PRK (-0.16; 95% CI, -0.24 to -0.09), but not with CXL alone. No significant differences in change were found between the 3 groups. Change in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was significant in all 3 groups: -0.12 (95% CI, -0.15 to -0.10) with CXL alone, -0.23 (95% CI, -0.27 to -0.20) with CXL-ICRS, and -0.17 (95% CI, -0.21 to -0.13) with CXL-TG-PRK. Improvement in CDVA was greater with CXL-ICRS than with CXL alone (-0.08 ± 0.02; P < .0001) and CXL-TG-PRK (-0.05 ± 0.02; P = .005). Change in Kmax was significant with CXL-ICRS [-3.21 diopters (D); 95% CI, -3.98 to -2.45] and CXL-TG-PRK (-3.69 D; 95% CI, -4.49 to -2.90), but not with CXL alone (-0.05 D; 95% CI, -0.66 to 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: CXL alone might be best for keratoconic patients who meet the inclusion criteria. CXL-ICRS might be more effective for eyes with more irregular astigmatism and worse CDVA and CXL-TG-PRK for eyes requiring improvements in irregular astigmatism but still have good CDVA.


Asunto(s)
Reactivos de Enlaces Cruzados , Queratocono/terapia , Láseres de Excímeros/uso terapéutico , Queratectomía Fotorrefractiva/métodos , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Prótesis e Implantes , Adulto , Colágeno/metabolismo , Sustancia Propia/metabolismo , Sustancia Propia/cirugía , Topografía de la Córnea , Dilatación Patológica/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Queratocono/tratamiento farmacológico , Queratocono/fisiopatología , Queratocono/cirugía , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Implantación de Prótesis , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Riboflavina/uso terapéutico , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rayos Ultravioleta , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adulto Joven
4.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 213: 76-87, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31945333

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We examined the efficacy and preoperative characteristics that affect outcomes of accelerated (9 mW/cm2 for 10 minutes) corneal cross-linking (CXL). DESIGN: Prospective single-center observational cohort study. METHODS: We enrolled 612 eyes of 391 subjects with progressive keratoconus (n = 589), pellucid marginal degeneration (n = 11), and laser in situ keratomileusis-induced ectasia (n = 12). We evaluated best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), topography, refraction, endothelial cell density, corneal thickness, haze, intraocular pressure, and visual function before and 12 months after the CXL procedure. We tabulated the proportion of those with progression of maximum keratometry (Kmax). We included participant's race, age, sex, and the presence of preoperative apical scarring and environmental allergies in a multivariable linear regression model to determine the effect of these characteristics on outcomes. RESULTS: At 1 year there was no significant change in mean Kmax (n = 569). Progression of Kmax was higher in subgroups with a baseline Kmax >58 diopters (n = 191) and those 14-18 years of age (n = 53). Preoperative BSCVA, Kmax, refraction, corneal cylinder, coma, central corneal thickness, and vision function were statistically and clinically significant predictors of outcomes (P < .001). Preoperative apical scarring led to worsening haze (P = .0001), more astigmatism (P = .002), more central corneal thinning (P = .002), and was protective to the endothelium (P = .008). Race, age, and sex affected some outcomes. CONCLUSION: Mean Kmax was stable at 1 year after accelerated CXL. Younger patients and those with a higher preoperative Kmax need to be monitored closely for progression. Preoperative BSCVA, topography, refraction, CCT, and apical scarring were significant predictors of outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Distrofias Hereditarias de la Córnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Reactivos de Enlaces Cruzados , Queratocono/tratamiento farmacológico , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Riboflavina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Colágeno/metabolismo , Distrofias Hereditarias de la Córnea/diagnóstico , Distrofias Hereditarias de la Córnea/metabolismo , Sustancia Propia/metabolismo , Topografía de la Córnea , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Queratocono/diagnóstico , Queratocono/metabolismo , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Rayos Ultravioleta , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 52(2): 175-180, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28457287

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the visual outcome, uveitis control, and complications following cataract surgery for intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with a known diagnosis of uveitis. DESIGN: The study was a retrospective interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed 98 patients (137 eyes) with adult uveitis undergoing cataract surgery with foldable acrylic posterior chamber IOL implantation between 2003 and 2013 in 2 uveitis practices. METHODS: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and uveitis grade (Standardized Uveitis Nomenclature criteria) were measured at 1 month preoperatively, at postoperative week 1, and at postoperative months 1, 6, and 12. The main outcome measures were mean change in postoperative BCVA, uveitis grade, and complications. RESULTS: Of the eyes studied, 84% had grade 0-0.5 anterior uveitis at postoperative week 1 and maintained uveitis control (77% grade 0; 19% grade 0.5 anterior uveitis) at 1 year postoperatively. None of the patients had active intermediate or posterior uveitis at any time point. Mean BCVA improved from 0.71 ± 0.38 logMAR preoperatively to 0.37 ± 0.36 at 6 months (p < 0.01) and to 0.30 ± 0.25 at 12 months (p = 0.01) postoperatively. Of the study participants, 30% had preoperative complications related to uveitis, including epiretinal membrane (12%), cystoid macular edema (12%), and glaucoma (5.8%); 46% of patients had small pupils as a result of posterior synechiae. Postoperative vision-limiting complications included posterior capsule opacification (18%), epiretinal membrane (9.0%), and cystoid macular edema (8.8%). Of the eyes studied, 5.8% underwent Nd:YAG capsulotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery with acrylic posterior-chamber IOL implantation is effective at improving visual acuity in patients with uveitis. Uveitis was well controlled in the majority of our study patients for 12 months after cataract surgery. The most frequent vision-limiting postoperative complication was posterior capsule opacification, which was treatable with Nd:YAG capsulotomy.


Asunto(s)
Catarata/complicaciones , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Facoemulsificación/métodos , Uveítis/complicaciones , Agudeza Visual , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uveítis/cirugía , Adulto Joven
6.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 9: 1255-68, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26203215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world use, efficacy, and safety of one or more dexamethasone intravitreal implant(s) 0.7 mg (DEX implant) in patients with macular edema (ME). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with ME secondary to retinal disease treated at ten Canadian retina practices, including one uveitis center. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma and cataract surgery, and safety data were collected from the medical charts of patients with ≥3 months of follow-up after the initial DEX implant. RESULTS: One hundred and one patient charts yielded data on 120 study eyes, including diagnoses of diabetic ME (DME) (n=34), retinal vein occlusion (RVO, n=30; branch in 19 and central in 11), and uveitis (n=23). Patients had a mean age of 60.9 years, and 73.3% of the study eyes had ME for a duration of ≥12 months prior to DEX implant injection(s). Baseline mean (± standard error) BCVA was 0.63±0.03 logMAR (20/86 Snellen equivalents) and mean CRT was 474.4±18.2 µm. The mean number of DEX implant injections was 1.7±0.1 in all study eyes; 44.2% of eyes had repeat DEX implant injections (reinjection interval 2.3-4.9 months). The greatest mean peak changes in BCVA lines of vision occurred in study eyes with uveitis (3.3±0.6, P<0.0001), followed by RVO (1.3±0.5, P<0.01) and DME (0.7±0.5, P>0.05). Significant decreases in CRT were observed: -255.6±43.6 µm for uveitis, -190.9±23.5 µm for DME, and -160.7±39.6 µm for RVO (P<0.0001 for all cohorts). IOP increases of ≥10 mmHg occurred in 20.6%, 24.1%, and 22.7% of DME, RVO, and uveitis study eyes, respectively. IOP-lowering medication was initiated in 29.4%, 16.7%, and 8.7% of DME, RVO, and uveitis study eyes, respectively. Glaucoma surgery was performed in 1.7% of all study eyes and cataract surgery in 29.8% of all phakic study eyes receiving DEX implant(s). CONCLUSION: DEX implant(s) alone or combined with other treatments and/or procedures resulted in functional and anatomic improvements in long-standing ME associated with retinal disease.

7.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 42(1): 89-94, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17361247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of mitomycin C (MMC)-augmented trabeculectomy in glaucoma patients with uveitis to those without uveitis but with other high-risk characteristics. METHODS: A retrospective comparative cohort analysis consisting of 51 eyes of 51 patients (21 uveitic patients and 30 nonuveitic patients) was performed. Two outcome classifications were analyzed: absolute success (intraocular pressure [IOP]

Asunto(s)
Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Glaucoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glaucoma/cirugía , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Trabeculectomía , Uveítis/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Glaucoma/etiología , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA