RESUMEN

The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) defines "difficult biliary cannulation" by the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 contacts with the papilla, more than 5 minutes attempting to cannulate, or inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct in 2 or more times (5-5-2 criteria), recommending these cut-off points to perform advanced cannulation techniques in order to reduce the rate of post-ERCP adverse events. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the 5-5-2 criteria and their association with post-ERCP complications in a reference hospital in Peru. We performed a prospective analytical case-control study and 120 patients who underwent ERCP were enrolled. The case group included 30 patients who met at least one of the 5-5-2 criteria and the control group included 90 patients without any of these criteria. The ERCP- related complications in both groups and their association with each of the 5-5-2 criteria were compared. The ERCP-related complications that occurred were post-ERCP pancreatitis (6.6% in the case group vs. 3.3% in the control group), bleeding (3.3% controls vs. 0% cases) and perforation (1.1% controls vs. 0% cases); no statistically significant differences were observed. The criterion of 2 or more unintended cannulations to the pancreatic duct showed a significant association (OR= 10.29, CI: 1.47-71.98; p= 0.005) with the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The criteria 5 minutes and 5 attempts were not associated with post-ERCP complications. In conclusion, among 5-5-2 criteria only the unintended cannulation of 2 or more times into the pancreatic duct was associated with an increased risk of post-ERC pancreatitis. The time and number of attempts criteria could be cautiously expanded without increasing the rate of post-ERCP complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This article summarizes the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of acute pancreatitis in the Social Security of Peru (EsSalud), to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for the management of acute pancreatitis in EsSalud. A guideline development group (GEG) was formed that included medical specialists and methodologists. The GEG formulated 7 clinical questions to be answered by this CPG. Systematic searches of systematic reviews and -when considered relevant- primary studies were carried out in PubMed during 2022. The evidence was selected to answer each of the clinical questions posed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. In periodic work meetings, the GEG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate the recommendations, the points of good clinical practice, and the corresponding flow charts. Finally, the CPG was approved with Resolution No. 105-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022. This CPG addressed 7 clinical questions on fluid therapy, start of enteral nutrition, analgesia, type of nutrition, antibiotic, and surgical treatment. Based on these questions, 8 recommendations (1 strong and 7 conditional), 13 BPCs, and 1 flowchart were formulated. This article summarizes the methodology and evidence-based conclusions of the CPG for the management of acute pancreatitis in EsSalud.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

La Sociedad Europea de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal (ESGE) define "canulación difícil" como aquella en la que se realizan más de 5 intentos, se exceden 5 minutos, o se produce canulación inadvertida del conducto pancreático 2 o más veces (criterios 5-5-2), recomendando estos puntos de corte para realizar técnicas avanzadas de canulación y disminuir la tasa de eventos adversos post CPRE. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el rendimiento de los criterios 5-5-2 y su asociación con complicaciones post CPRE en un hospital de referencia de Perú. Realizamos un estudio analítico prospectivo de casos y controles en el que se incluyó 120 pacientes a los que se realizó CPRE. El grupo casos estuvo formado por 30 pacientes que cumplieron al menos uno de los criterios 5-5-2 y el grupo controles por 90 pacientes sin ninguno de estos criterios. Se comparó el desarrollo de complicaciones en cada grupo y su asociación con cada uno de los criterios 5-5-2. Las complicaciones presentadas fueron: pancreatitis post CPRE (6,6% en el grupo casos vs 3,3% en el grupo controles), sangrado (3,3% controles vs 0% casos) y perforación (1,1% controles vs 0 % casos); sin observar diferencia estadísticamente significativa. El criterio de 2 o más ingresos inadvertidos al conducto pancreático presentó asociación significativa (OR= 10,29, IC: 1,47-71,98; p= 0,005) con el desarrollo de pancreatitis post CPRE. Los criterios 5 minutos y 5 intentos no se asociaron a complicaciones post CPRE. En conclusión, el más relevante de los criterios 5-5-2 fue el ingreso inadvertido al conducto pancreático en 2 o más ocasiones, mostrando asociación por sí solo con pancreatitis post CPRE. Los criterios tiempo y número de intentos podrían ampliarse con cautela sin aumentar la tasa de complicaciones post CPRE.

The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) defines "difficult biliary cannulation" by the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 contacts with the papilla, more than 5 minutes attempting to cannulate, or inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct in 2 or more times (5-5-2 criteria), recommending these cut-off points to perform advanced cannulation techniques in order to reduce the rate of post-ERCP adverse events. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the 5-5-2 criteria and their association with post-ERCP complications in a reference hospital in Peru. We performed a prospective analytical case-control study and 120 patients who underwent ERCP were enrolled. The case group included 30 patients who met at least one of the 5-5-2 criteria and the control group included 90 patients without any of these criteria. The ERCP- related complications in both groups and their association with each of the 5-5-2 criteria were compared. The ERCP-related complications that occurred were post-ERCP pancreatitis (6.6% in the case group vs. 3.3% in the control group), bleeding (3.3% controls vs. 0% cases) and perforation (1.1% controls vs. 0% cases); no statistically significant differences were observed. The criterion of 2 or more unintended cannulations to the pancreatic duct showed a significant association (OR= 10.29, CI: 1.47-71.98; p= 0.005) with the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The criteria 5 minutes and 5 attempts were not associated with post-ERCP complications. In conclusion, among 5-5-2 criteria only the unintended cannulation of 2 or more times into the pancreatic duct was associated with an increased risk of post-ERC pancreatitis. The time and number of attempts criteria could be cautiously expanded without increasing the rate of post-ERCP complications.

RESUMEN

El presente artículo resume la guía de práctica clínica (GPC) para el manejo de la pancreatitis aguda en el Seguro Social del Perú (EsSalud). Su objetivo es proveer recomendaciones clínicas basadas en evidencia para el manejo de la pancreatitis aguda en EsSalud. Se conformó un grupo elaborador de la guía (GEG) que incluyó médicos especialistas y metodólogos. El GEG formuló 7 preguntas clínicas a ser respondidas por la presente GPC. Se realizó búsquedas sistemáticas de revisiones sistemáticas y -cuando fue considerado pertinente- estudios primarios en PubMed durante el 2022. Se seleccionó la evidencia para responder cada una de las preguntas clínicas planteadas. La certeza de la evidencia fue evaluada usando la metodología Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). En reuniones de trabajo periódicas, el GEG usó la metodología GRADE para revisar la evidencia y formular las recomendaciones, los puntos de buenas prácticas clínicas y flujogramas correspondientes. Finalmente, la GPC fue aprobada con Resolución N° 105-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022. La presente GPC abordó 7 preguntas clínicas sobre fluidoterapia, momento de inicio de nutrición enteral, analgesia, tipo de nutrición, tratamiento antibiótico y quirúrgico. En base a dichas preguntas se formularon 8 recomendaciones (1 fuerte y 7 condicionales), 13 BPC, y 1 flujograma. El presente artículo resume la metodología y las conclusiones basadas en evidencia de la GPC para el manejo de la pancreatitis aguda en EsSalud.

This article summarizes the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of acute pancreatitis in the Social Security of Peru (EsSalud), to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for the management of acute pancreatitis in EsSalud. A guideline development group (GEG) was formed that included medical specialists and methodologists. The GEG formulated 7 clinical questions to be answered by this CPG. Systematic searches of systematic reviews and -when considered relevant-primary studies were carried out in PubMed during 2022. The evidence was selected to answer each of the clinical questions posed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. In periodic work meetings, the GEG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate the recommendations, the points of good clinical practice, and the corresponding ow charts. Finally, the CPG was approved with Resolution No. 105-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022. This CPG addressed 7 clinical questions on buid therapy, start of enteral nutrition, analgesia, type of nutrition, antibiotic, and surgical treatment. Based on these questions, 8 recommendations (1 strong and 7 conditional), 13 BPCs, and 1 flowchart were formulated. This article summarizes the methodology and evidence-based conclusions of the CPG for the management of acute pancreatitis in EsSalud.

RESUMEN

Resumen Introducción: existen diversos factores de riesgo para presentar complicaciones poscolangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE), uno de los recientemente estudiados es la morfología de la papila duodenal. Objetivos: evaluar la asociación entre las características morfológicas de la papila duodenal y las complicaciones pos-CPRE en pacientes atendidos en el servicio de gastroenterología de un hospital de referencia de Perú. Métodos: estudio prospectivo y analítico que incluyó a 138 pacientes en los que se realizó CPRE, estableciendo relación entre el tipo de papila duodenal según la clasificación endoscópica propuesta por Haraldsson y colaboradores, y las complicaciones pos-CPRE de hasta 1 mes de seguimiento. Resultados: se incluyeron 138 pacientes, 93 mujeres (68,42 %) y 45 varones (31,58 %), con una edad promedio de 51,46 años. El tipo 1 se asoció con menor dificultad en la canulación con un odds ratio (OR): 0,42 (intervalo de confianza [IC]: 0,20-0,88). El tipo 4 presentó significativamente mayor tiempo de canulación (6,83 minutos). La tasa de pancreatitis pos-CPRE fue de 2,9 %; de sangrado, 1,45 %, y de perforación, 0,72 %. La perforación presentó asociación estadísticamente significativa con el tipo de papila (p = 0,009). El tipo 2 presentó mayores tasas de pancreatitis (9,09 %) y perforación (9,09 %) pos-CPRE. Conclusión: el tipo de papila duodenal se asocia significativamente con perforación pos-CPRE. El tipo 2 presentó tasas más altas de complicaciones.

Abstract Introduction: several risk factors exist for complications post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and the morphology of the duodenal papilla is among those recently studied. Objectives: to evaluate the association between the morphological characteristics of the duodenal papilla and post-ERCP complications in patients seen in the gastroenterology unit of a Peruvian referral hospital. Methods: a prospective and analytical study including 138 patients who underwent ERCP, establishing a relationship between the type of duodenal papilla according to the endoscopic classification proposed by Haraldsson et al. and post-ERCP complications for up to 1 month of follow-up. Results: one hundred thirty-eight patients were included, 93 were females (68.42%), and 45 were males (31.58%), with 51.46 years of mean age. Type 1 was associated with less difficulty in cannulation, with an odds ratio (OR): 0.42 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.88). Type 4 had a significantly longer cannulation time (6.83 minutes). The post-ERCP ratio for pancreatitis was 2.9%; bleeding, 1.45%, and perforation, 0.72%. The perforation showed a statistically significant association with papilla type (p = 0.009). Type 2 showed higher rates of pancreatitis (9.09%) and post-ERCP perforation (9.09%). Conclusion: the duodenal papilla type is significantly associated with post-ERCP perforation. Type 2 showed higher complication rates.

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent worldwide. Approximately one third of cases originate from the serrated pathway of carcinogenesis, with colonic sessile serrated lesions (SSL) being the main cause of interval CRC. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, endoscopic, histological characteristics and endoscopic management of colonic LSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational, descriptive, retrospective study from July 2017 to June 2019 in the gastroenterology service of the Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital, Lima - Peru. The characteristics of 79 LSS were evaluated, the chi-square statistic was used to analyze the association of clinical and endoscopic variables with the presence of dysplasia; and the size of the lesion with the type of endoscopic resection. RESULTS: In 74 patients, 79 SSL were found, 67 (84.8%) with dysplasia (44 high-grade and 23 low-grade). Average age of 52 years and 44 (59.4%) were males. The location in the right colon (OR=5.09, 95% CI 1.38â€"18.7, p=0.009), the size >10 mm (OR=6.13, 95% CI 1.50â€"24,94, p=0.014) and the â€Å“blurred edges†(OR=5.08, 95% CI 1.17-21.98, p=0.019), are significantly related to the presence of dysplasia. SSL smaller than 20 mm showed statistical association with bloc resection (OR=69.3, 95% CI 7.35-653.9, p <0.001) with respect to the piecemeal resection. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of SSL during colonoscopies is frequent. The location, size and finding of blurred edges are related to the presence of dysplasia. Mucosal endoscopic resection was a safe and effective technique.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RESUMEN El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es uno de los más frecuentes a nivel mundial. Aproximadamente un tercio de los casos se originan por la vía serrada de carcinogénesis, siendo las lesiones serradas sésiles (LSS) de colon, una las principales responsables del CCR de intervalo. Objetivo: Evaluar las características clínicas, endoscópicas, histológicas y el manejo endoscópico de las LSS de colon. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo de julio del 2017 a junio del 2019 en el servicio de gastroenterología del Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, Lima - Perú. Se evaluó las características de 79 LSS, se utilizó el estadístico chi-cuadrado para analizar la asociación de variables clínicas y endoscópicas con la presencia de displasia; y el tamaño de la lesión con el tipo de resección endoscópica. Resultados: En 74 pacientes se halló 79 LSS, 67 (84,8%) con displasia (44 de alto grado y 23 de bajo grado). Edad media de 52 años y 44 (59,4%) fueron varones. La localización en colon derecho (OR=5,09, IC 95% 1,38-18,7, p= 0,009), el tamaño >10 mm (OR=6,13/IC 95%/1,50-24,94/ p=0,014) y los "bordes borrosos" (OR=5,08, IC 95% 1,17-21,98, p=0,019), se relacionan de manera significativa con la presencia de displasia. Las LSS menores a 20 mm mostraron asociación estadística con la resección en bloque (OR=69,3, IC 95% 7,35-653,9, p<0,001) respecto a la piecemeal. Conclusiones: El hallazgo de LSS durante colonoscopías es frecuente. La localización, el tamaño y el hallazgo de bordes borrosos se relacionan con la presencia de displasia. La resección endoscópica mucosa fue una técnica segura y efectiva.

ABSTRACT Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent worldwide. Approximately one third of cases originate from the serrated pathway of carcinogenesis, with colonic sessile serrated lesions (SSL) being the main cause of interval CRC. Objective: To evaluate the clinical, endoscopic, histological characteristics and endoscopic management of colonic LSS. Materials and methods: Observational, descriptive, retrospective study from July 2017 to June 2019 in the gastroenterology service of the Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital, Lima - Peru. The characteristics of 79 LSS were evaluated, the chi-square statistic was used to analyze the association of clinical and endoscopic variables with the presence of dysplasia; and the size of the lesion with the type of endoscopic resection. Results: In 74 patients, 79 SSL were found, 67 (84.8%) with dysplasia (44 high-grade and 23 low-grade). Average age of 52 years and 44 (59.4%) were males. The location in the right colon (OR=5.09, 95% CI 1.38-18.7, p=0.009), the size >10 mm (OR=6.13, 95% CI 1.50-24,94, p=0.014) and the "blurred edges" (OR=5.08, 95% CI 1.17-21.98, p=0.019), are significantly related to the presence of dysplasia. SSL smaller than 20 mm showed statistical association with bloc resection (OR=69.3, 95% CI 7.35-653.9, p <0.001) with respect to the piecemeal resection. Conclusions: The finding of SSL during colonoscopies is frequent. The location, size and finding of blurred edges are related to the presence of dysplasia. Mucosal endoscopic resection was a safe and effective technique.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by a recurrent and remitting course. Clinical remission and mucosal healing are the current therapeutic goals in management. The histological remission could be a better objective because of its prognostic impact. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate endoscopic and histological activity as predictors of clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective descriptive study conducted from January 2015 to June 2018 at Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital. Thirty-three patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis who presented clinical remission after a flare were evaluated. Endoscopic remission was assessed (Mayo Score ≤1) after 6 months of follow- up with ileocolonoscopy and rectosigmoid biopsies. Histological remission was defined as score < 2 in the Simplified Geboes Score (SGS). Follow-up was performed for one year to observe relapses. RESULTS: 26 (78.8%) patients achieved endoscopic remission at 6 months (mean age 53 years, males 57.7%). Histological remission was observed in 69.2% (18/26). After 1 year of follow-up, 83.3% (15/18) of the patients who presented clinical, endoscopic and histological remission remained clinically asymptomatic. The RR of clinical relapse at one year was 3,18 (95% IC, 1,58-6,42, p=0,004) in patients without endoscopic remission and 4 (95% IC, 1,34-11,94, p=0,003) in patients without histological remission. CONCLUSIONS: Histological activity could be a better predictor of relapse compared to endoscopic remission, and should be the final therapeutic objective in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis.

Asunto(s)