RESUMEN

Acarbose is a widely used α-glucosidase inhibitor for the management of postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent pilot studies on acarbose bioequivalence (BE) have successfully identified additional pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters as valid end points. Nevertheless, there was a scarcity of published pivotal studies using novel PD parameters. The purpose of the study is to investigate the acarbose BE using the new PD parameters. The study was conducted with an open, randomized, 2-period crossover design. A total of 64 healthy Chinese volunteers received either the reference (R) or test (T) acarbose at a dose of 2×50 mg orally, followed by a 1-week washout period. After sucrose treatment (baseline) and sucrose/acarbose co-administration, serum glucose, and insulin concentrations were assessed. The rectifying approach yielded geometric mean ratios of 102.9% for maximum serum glucose concentration with deduction of glucose concentration at 0 hour and 105.3% for the area under the serum glucose concentration-time curve profile 0-2 hours after coadministration of sucrose and acarbose with deduction of baseline (AUC0-2 h,r ). The 90% confidence intervals of maximum serum glucose concentration with deduction of glucose concentration at 0 hour and the area under the serum glucose concentration-time curve profile 0-2 hours after coadministration of sucrose and acarbose with deduction of baseline all fell within the acceptance limits. The incidence of adverse events after the T or R drug was comparable, and healthy subjects were well tolerated. The findings of our investigation clearly show that the PD parameters of the rectifying method exhibit enhanced suitability and sensitivity when assessing acarbose BE in healthy participants. The T and R drugs were bioequivalent using the novel PD parameters, and both drugs demonstrated good safety and tolerability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1169103.].

RESUMEN

Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety properties between a new generic and a brand reference formulation of esomeprazole enteric-coated tablets 20 mg in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. Methods: The fasting study was an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study conducted in 32 healthy Chinese volunteers, and the fed study was a four-period crossover study conducted in 40 healthy Chinese volunteers. Blood samples were collected at the specified time points and determined to obtain the plasma concentrations of esomeprazole. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the non-compartment method. Bioequivalence was analyzed by the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). The safety of the two formulations was assessed. Results: The fasting and fed study showed that the pharmacokinetics of the two formulations was similar. Under the fasting condition, the 90% CIs of GMRs of the test-to-reference formulation were 87.92%-104.36% for Cmax, 87.82%-101.45% for AUC0-t, and 87.99%-101.54% for AUC0-∞; under the fed condition, the 90% CIs of GMRs of the test-to-reference formulation were 80.53%-94.95% for Cmax, 87.46%-97.26% for AUC0-t, and 87.46%-97.16% for AUC0-∞. The 90% CIs of GMRs fall within the bioequivalence range of 80.00%-125.00%. The two formulations had good safety and were well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion: According to relevant regulatory standards, esomeprazole enteric-coated generic and reference products exhibited bioequivalence and good safety in healthy Chinese subjects. Clinical Trials Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, identifier CTR20171347 and CTR20171484.

RESUMEN

Background: This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant humanized anti-human IL-6R monoclonal antibody injection, LZM008, and evaluate the pharmacokinetic similarity between LZM008 and tocilizumab (ACTEMRA®) in Chinese healthy male subjects. Research design and methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, paralleled, two-center Phase I clinical trial, 96 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 ratio to receive 4 mg/kg intravenous dose of LZM008 or ACTEMRA® and evaluated for 28 days. The pharmacokinetic bioequivalence was assessed by the maximum serum concentration (Cmax), the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last detectable drug concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC0-∞. The statistical analysis was conducted using SAS Enterprise Guide statistical software. Safety was assessed by physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms. Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were measured by a bridged electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Results: LZM008 (N = 49) and ACTEMRA® (N = 47) groups showed similar pharmacokinetic properties. After a single intravenous infusion of 4 mg/kg LZM008, the Cmax and AUC0-∞ values of LZM008 reached 87.99 µg/mL and 11,526.70 h*µg/mL, respectively, with Tmax 1.98 h, and the half-life (t1/2) was 83.45 h. The 90% confidence intervals of ratios for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were within the range of 80.00%-125.00%. After infusion, one (2.0%) subject in the LZM008 group and three (6.4%) subjects in the ACTEMRA® group showed positive ADA test results. The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was comparable in LZM008 and ACTEMRA® groups (98.0% versus 100%), with the decrease in blood fibrinogen and neutrophil counts being the most common TEAEs. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic characteristics and immunogenicity exhibited by LZM008 were similar to those of the reference product, ACTEMRA®. The safety profiles of LZM008 were similar in the two groups with mild-moderate adverse effects. Trial Registration: The trial is registered at www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn (CTR20190889).

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Janumet® XR is the combination of sitagliptin and extended metformin hydrochloride produced by Merck Sharp & Dohme. It is specially designed for diabetes mellitus patients taking both drugs already. Janumet® XR exhibited clinically significant blood glucose lowering efficacy and long-term use safety. However, no generic form of Janumet® XR has been approved in western countries. The relatively high cost made the medication less prescribed. A more affordable form of this drug may benefit an immense diabetes mellitus population. The current study compared the bioequivalence (BE) of sitagliptin 100 mg and metformin 1000 mg produced by Nanjing Chia-Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Company to Janumet® XR in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy Chinese subjects were enrolled in Study 1 and 2, respectively. Both studies were conducted with an open, randomized, two-period crossover design using the test (T) or the reference (R) drug. Study 1 is conducted under the fasting state, and Study 2 is under the fed state. Subjects received an oral dose of sitagliptin 100 mg and metformin 1000 mg, and plasma concentrations of sitagliptin and metformin were determined up to 72 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) of both sitagliptin and metformin, were calculated and compared between the T and R treatments. Results: In the fasting study, the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for sitagliptin were 109.42%, 101.93%, and 101.95%, respectively; the corresponding ratios for metformin were 98.69%, 94.12%, and 93.42%, respectively. In the fed study, the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for sitagliptin were 98.41%, 100.30%, and 100.24%, respectively; the corresponding ratios for metformin were 97.79%, 99.28%, and 100.69%, respectively. The 90% CIs of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ in both studies were all within acceptance limits (80.00%-125.00%). Conclusion: The results demonstrated for the first time that sitagliptin 100 mg and metformin 1000 mg produced by Nanjing Chia-Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Company was bioequivalent to the branded Janumet® XR, and both drugs were well tolerated.

RESUMEN

Objective: This study was performed to investigate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of WXFL10203614 in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment (fed vs fasted), two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. 14 eligible subjects were averagely randomized into 2 sequences and then received 10 mg WXFL10203614 under fasted or fed condition. In each period, the blood samples were collected from 0 h (pre-dose) and serially up to 72 h post-dose, and plasma concentrations were detected using the high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. The effect of food on the PK profile and safety of WXFL10203614 were assessed. Results: 70 subjects were screened, and 14 subjects (10 male and 4 female) were enrolled and completed the study. Under the fasted condition, WXFL10203614 was absorbed rapidly with a Tmax of 0.98 h. The absorption rate was slower, Tmax delayed by 2.98 h, and the Cmax decreased by 16.3% when WXFL10203614 administered after the high-fat and high-calorie diet, other PK parameters were not affected. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio (fed/fasted) of geometric means of the Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 0.73-1.01, 0.90-1.03 and 0.90-1.03, indicating that the high-fat and high-calorie diet might impact the absorption process of WXFL10203614. Although the Cmax was slightly decreased, there was no significant difference in the Cmax under fasted and fed conditions. Thus, it was not considered clinically significant owing to the small magnitude of changes in Cmax. All Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild and resolved spontaneously without treatment. Conclusion: Food had no clinically relevant effects on drug system exposure of WXFL10203614. It was well tolerated under fasted and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects, so WXFL10203614 could be administered orally with or without food. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, identifier CTR20191636.

RESUMEN

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of WXFL10203614 after single and multiple oral doses in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ⅰ study was performed on healthy Chinese subjects. In the single-dose study, Subjects were randomized into 7 dose levels of WXFL10203614 (1 mg group, n = 2; 2, 5, 10, 17, 25 and 33 mg groups with placebo, 8 subjects per group, 2 of them given placebo). In the multiple-dose study, subjects received 5 or 10 mg WXFL10203614 once daily (QD), 5 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo for 7 consecutive days. Safety, tolerability and PK of WXFL10203614 were all assessed. Results: A total of 592 subjects were screened, 50 subjects were enrolled in the single-dose study and 30 in the multiple-dose study. All adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate and resolved spontaneously. No Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or deaths were reported during the study. WXFL10203614 was absorbed rapidly after dosing with Tmax of 0.48-0.98 h, Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were all increased in a dose-related manner over the range of 1-33 mg. Renal excretion was the major route of elimination of WXFL10203614. Steady-state PK parameters (Cmax,ss, AUC0-t,ss and AUC0-∞,ss) were elevated after once-daily administration of 5-10 mg WXFL10203614 and non- and weak drug accumulations were observed, whereas moderate drug accumulation occurred in the 5 mg BID group. Conclusion: WXFL10203614 exhibited good safety, tolerability and favorable PK profiles in healthy Chinese subjects, supporting further clinical development in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Trials Registration Number: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, #CTR20190069 and CTR20200143.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: 101BHG-D01 nasal spray is the first novel long-acting cholinergic M receptor antagonist under development to treat rhinorrhea in rhinitis. This first-in-human study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of 101BHG-D01 nasal spray following single intranasal doses in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study was conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers after intranasal doses of 101BHG-D01 nasal spray or placebo ranging from 40 µg to 960 µg (total of six doses). Blood samples were collected at scheduled time points, and plasma concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. A non-compartmental method was used to calculate the main pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and the elimination half-life (t1/2). Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, laboratory assays, vital signs, physical examinations, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), anterior rhinoscopy, ophthalmic examination, and ambulatory ECG monitoring. RESULTS: Following single intranasal dosing, 101BHG-D01 was rapidly absorbed with a median Tmax of 0.34-0.50 h and eliminated slowly with a mean t1/2 ranging from 4.29 to 46.76 h for different dose groups. The Cmax and AUC of 101BHG-D01 increased linearly across the examined dose range of 40-960 µg. 101BHG-D01 nasal spray was well tolerated, all AEs were mild, and no serious adverse events occurred during the study. CONCLUSIONS: 101BHG-D01 nasal spray was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects when administered intranasally in single escalating doses. The mean Cmax and AUC increased proportionally to the studied dose. The pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability profiles of 101BHG-D01 nasal spray indicate that it is a good candidate for further development as a treatment for rhinorrhea in rhinitis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Henagliflozin is a novel selective sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor with similar inhibitory effect to ertugliflozin. Glimepiride is widely used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with few cardiovascular side effects. In the present study, we aimed at evaluating the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between henagliflozin and glimepiride. METHODS: An open-label, single-centre, single-arm, 3-period, 3-treatment, self-control study was conducted in twelve healthy Chinese male subjects. During each study period, subjects received a single oral dose of glimepiride 2 mg, multiple oral doses of henagliflozin 10 mg or a combination of the two drugs. Serial blood samples were collected 24 h post-dosing for PK analyses. Finger-tip blood glucose was also tested for safety evaluation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Co-administration of henagliflozin with glimepiride did not affect their plasma PK profiles. For henagliflozin, the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for the maximum plasma concentrations at steady-state (Cmax ss ) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval at steady-state (AUCτ, ss ) of combination therapy to henagliflozin alone were 1.00 (0.93-1.08) and 1.00 (0.98-1.02), respectively. For glimepiride, the corresponding values of combination therapy to glimepiride alone were 1.00 (0.88-1.13) for maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax ), 0.91 (0.84-0.99) for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 h (AUC0-24h ) and 0.91 (0.83-1.00) for the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinite (AUC0-inf ), respectively. All values fell within the equivalence range of 0.8-1.25. All monotherapies and combination therapy led to no serious adverse events and were well tolerated. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Multiple doses of henagliflozin did not exert a significant change on glimepiride PK profiles and a single dose of glimepiride had little effect on henagliflozin blood concentration. Thus, henagliflozin can be co-administered with glimepiride without dose adjustment of either drug.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Palbociclib is an oral small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 used for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. This study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between a new generic and a branded reference formulation of palbociclib capsules in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions and evaluated the bioequivalence of two palbociclib products to obtain sufficient evidence for the marketing approval of the new generic drug. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions (30 subjects/condition). Eligible healthy subjects received a single 125-mg dose of the palbociclib test or reference formulation followed by a 14-day washout period. Serial blood samples were collected at scheduled timepoints, and plasma concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. A non-compartment method was used to calculate the main pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), the AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the time to maximum plasma concentration, and the elimination half-life. The geometric mean ratios and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals of palbociclib were acquired for the bioequivalence analysis. Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring adverse events, laboratory assessments, vital signs, physical examinations, and 12-lead electrocardiograms. RESULTS: Under the fasting condition, the pharmacokinetic parameter values of the test formulation were similar to those of the reference formulation. The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios of the test to reference formulations were 94.35-103.82% for Cmax, 94.79-103.26% for AUC0-t, and 94.82-103.38% for AUC0-∞, which are all within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00-125.00%. Meanwhile, under the fed condition, the pharmacokinetic parameter values of the test formulation were also similar to those of the reference formulation. The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios of the test to reference formulations were 96.65-103.56% for Cmax, 98.06-103.61% for AUC0-t, and 97.88-103.46% for AUC0-∞, which are all within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00-125.00%. The test and reference products were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of palbociclib in healthy subjects was established between the palbociclib test formulation and the reference formulation under fasting and fed conditions according to predetermined regulatory criteria. The two formulations were safe and well tolerated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of HOT-1010 with bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Chinese healthy male subjects. Methods: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel trial was performed in 84 Chinese healthy male subjects who randomly (1:1) received a single intravenous infusion of 1 mg/kg HOT-1010 or Avastin® for 90 min and followed up for 85 days. Serum concentrations of bevacizumab were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, were calculated and evaluated the bioequivalence between HOT-1010 and Avastin®, the safety and immunogenicity of investigational drugs were also assessed. Results: A total of 82 subjects completed the study. The 90% Confidence Intervals for geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 91.81-103.64%, 85.19-95.39% and 85.04-95.36%, which were all within the bioequivalence margin. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 27 (65.9%) subjects in HOT-1010 group and 23 (56.1%) subjects in Avastin® group. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate. No TEAEs, Serious Adverse Events or deaths leading to discontinuation was reported. Subjects were all tested negative for Anti-drug Antibody. Conclusion: HOT-1010 exhibited the similar pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity profiles of bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Chinese healthy male subjects. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, CTR20181610.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the kinetics of the formation of 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbazepine (MHD)-O-glucuronide in human liver microsomes (HLMs), human intestine microsomes (HIMs), human kidney microsomes (HKMs) and recombinant human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGTs), and identify the primary UGT isoforms catalyzing the glucuronidation of MHD. METHODS: The kinetics of the glucuronidation of MHD was determined in HLMs, HIMs as well as HKMs. Screening assays with 13 recombinant human UGTs, inhibition studies and correlation analysis were performed to identify the main UGTs involved in the glucuronidation of MHD. KEY FINDINGS: MHD-O-glucuronide was formed in HLMs, HIMs as well as HKMs, HLMs showed the highest intrinsic clearance of MHD. Among 13 recombinant human UGTs, UGT2B7 and UGT1A9 were identified to be the principal UGT isoforms mediating the glucuronidation of MHD, while UGT1A4 played a partial role. In addition, inhibition studies and correlation analysis further confirmed that UGT2B7 and UGT1A9 participated in the formation of MHD-O-glucuronide. CONCLUSIONS: MHD could be metabolized by UGTs in the liver, intestine and kidney, and the hepatic glucuronidation was the critical metabolic pathway. UGT2B7 and UGT1A9 were the primary UGT isoforms mediating the formation of MHD-O-glucuronide in the liver.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Acarbose is a poorly absorbed α-glucosidase inhibitor that acts locally in the intestinal tract. Therefore, the evaluation of its bioequivalence (BE) should be based on pharmacodynamic (PD) rather than pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints. Currently, there is no consensus on the best method for acarbose BE evaluation. The optimal protocol design regarding dosing time/dose and PD parameters requires further exploration. The aim of the study was to identify an optimum protocol for establishing acarbose BE in healthy Chinese volunteers using PD endpoints. METHODS: Three pilot studies were conducted in healthy Chinese subjects. Study 1 was an open, randomized, two-period crossover study using the reference (R) drug at the dose of 1 × 50 mg. Study 1 aimed to determine appropriate dosing time by comparing the PD effect of acarbose between two administration methods. One method was concomitant administration of sucrose and acarbose, and another method was acarbose administration 10 min before sucrose. Study 2 was an open, randomized, three-period crossover study. Subjects were given the R drug at the dose of 1 × 50 mg, 2 × 50 mg or 3 × 50 mg in a random sequence. The aim of Study 2 was to identify a reasonable dose of acarbose in the BE study. Study 3 was conducted with an open, randomized, three-period crossover design using the test (T) or R drug in an R-T-R sequence at the dose of 2 × 50 mg. Study 3 aimed to compare the BE between the R and T drug and determine intra-individual variation. Twelve subjects were recruited in Study 1, Study 2 and Study 3, respectively, with a one-week washout period. Serum glucose and insulin concentrations were determined after sucrose administration (baseline) and sucrose/acarbose co-administration. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In Study 1, no significant differences in PD parameters were found between the two administration methods. The results of Study 2 revealed that the optimal dose was between 1 × 50 mg and 2 × 50 mg. The comparison of PD parameters indicated that the rectifying method could distinguish between different formulations. Study 3 showed that the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, r , AUC0-2 h, r and AUC0-4 h, r were 90.06%, 84.55% and 84.21%, respectively, using the rectifying method. The 90% CIs of Cmax, r were within acceptance limits (80.00%-125.00%), whereas that of AUC0-2 h, r and AUC0-4 h, r were out of the range. The intra-individual variation was approximately 21% for R formulation. Based on the variation, the number of subjects needed to identify formulation differences in the pivotal study would be 55 with 90% power at the 5% level of significance. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The results from our study manifested that a randomized, balanced, two-way crossover design was eligible to evaluate acarbose BE. The appropriate dosing time was concomitant administration of sucrose and acarbose, and the optimal dose was 2 × 50 mg. The rectifying method exhibited preferable sensitivity and applicability in acarbose BE evaluation. A practical sample size of the pivotal study would be 55. These results may help to provide new insights into the protocol design of acarbose BE study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Myelosuppression is the most common dose-limiting adverse effect of chemotherapies. In the present study, we investigated the involvement of nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression in mice, and evaluated the potential of activating Nrf2 signaling as a preventive strategy. The whole blood from Nrf2-/- mice exhibited decreased antioxidant capacities, while the bone marrow cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and granulocytes from Nrf2-/- mice were more susceptible to acrolein-induced cytotoxicity than those from wild type mice. Single dosage of cyclophosphamide induced significantly severer acute myelosuppression in Nrf2-/- mice than in wild type mice. Furthermore, Nrf2-/- mice exhibited greater loss of peripheral blood nucleated cells and recovered slower from myelosuppression nadir upon multiple consecutive dosages of cyclophosphamide than wild type mice did. This was accompanied with decreased antioxidant and detoxifying gene expressions and impaired colony formation ability of Nrf2-/- bone marrow cells. More importantly, activation of Nrf2 signaling by CDDO-Me significantly alleviated cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression, while this alleviation was diminished in Nrf2-/- mice. In conclusion, the present study shows that Nrf2 plays a protective role in cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression and activation of Nrf2 is a promising strategy to prevent or treat chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression.

Asunto(s)