Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nursing ; 49(1): 40-43, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586048

RESUMEN

Nurses may see patients who have recently returned from tropical vacations complaining of a severe pruritic dermatitis known as seabather's eruption (SBE). Caused by exposure to jellyfish larvae, SBE is characterized by a pruritic rash, but some patients, particularly children, experience systemic signs and symptoms such as fever, chills, and nausea/vomiting. This article discusses SBE and reviews assessment tips, nursing care, and patient teaching.


Asunto(s)
Copépodos , Dermatitis/etiología , Dermatitis/enfermería , Calor/efectos adversos , Agua de Mar/parasitología , Natación , Animales , Humanos , Evaluación en Enfermería , Educación del Paciente como Asunto
3.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 11(1): 36-41, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17169874

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, the safety of pralidoxime administration via adult autoinjectors for pediatric patients has not been established. Up until 2000, the published literature did not recommend its usage for children less than 12 kg or under the age of 10 years old. Since 2000, limited published articles have emerged validating adult autoinjector usage for the pediatric victim, in extreme circumstances. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether adverse drug reactions (ADR) from pralidoxime administration to children occur. METHOD: Recurrent PubMed Medline literature search of all years were performed from 2001 to 2004 inclusive. The main search criteria were articles pertaining to U.S. children 16 years or younger who received pralidoxime. In addition, a review of 3 years (1999-2001) of detailed retrospective TESS exposure annual poison center data was obtained from the AAPCC. RESULTS: Eighty-one children met inclusion criteria and received pralidoxime for suspected organophosphate poisoning. Two children (2.5%) expired. Three children (3.7%) were identified as having a potential adverse drug reaction; all were mild. CONCLUSION: The author's recognize this study possesses limitations that require its findings be interpreted with caution. Our data suggest that adverse drug reactions to pralidoxime treatment in children are rare. However, further investigation is needed to more firmly establish the safety of this antidote in children and for its use in the prehospital environment.


Asunto(s)
Antídotos/envenenamiento , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Compuestos de Pralidoxima/envenenamiento , Adolescente , Antídotos/administración & dosificación , Antídotos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Compuestos de Pralidoxima/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Pralidoxima/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA