RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Workplace bullying is a pervasive problem with significant personal, social and economic costs. Estimates of the resulting lost productivity provide an important societal perspective on the impact of the problem. Understanding where these economic costs fall is relevant for policy. AIMS: We estimated the value of lost productivity to the economy from workplace bullying in the public and private sectors in Ireland. METHODS: We used nationally representative survey data and multivariable negative binomial regression to estimate the independent effect of workplace bullying on days absent from work. We applied the human capital approach to derive an estimate of the annual value of lost productivity due to bullying by sector and overall, in 2017. RESULTS: Bullying was independently associated with an extra 1.00 (95% CI: 0.38-1.62) days absent from work over a 4-week period. This differed for public and private sector employees: 0.69 (95% CI: -0.12 to 1.50) versus 1.45 (95% CI: 0.50-2.40) days respectively. Applying official data, we estimated the associated annual value of lost productivity to be 51.8 million in the public sector, 187.6 million in the private sector and 239.3 million overall. CONCLUSIONS: The economic value of lost productivity from workplace bullying in Ireland is significant. Although bullying is more prevalent in the public sector, it has a larger effect on absence in the private sector. Given this, along with the greater overall share of employees, productivity losses from bullying are considerably larger in the private sector in Ireland.
Asunto(s)
Acoso Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Eficiencia Organizacional/economía , Sector Privado/economía , Sector Público/economía , Lugar de Trabajo/economía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Lugar de Trabajo/psicologíaRESUMEN
Concussion education is an important aspect of concussion prevention. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a novel, theory of planned behavior (TPB)-driven concussion education program on secondary school athletes' concussion-reporting relevant cognitions immediately post-intervention and at 3 months follow-up. Data were collected from 428 secondary school athletes during the 2016-2017 academic year: 229 were assigned to an intervention group of which 59 (25.76%) completed assessments at all timepoints; 199 were assigned to a control group of which 153 (76.88%) completed assessments at all timepoints. Using repeated measures ANOVAs, we examined differences in athletes' concussion-reporting cognitions, by group and gender. The program had a significant positive effect on athletes' knowledge (P < 0.01), perceived behavioral control over concussion recognition and reporting (P < 0.01), and reporting intention (P < 0.01). These results were maintained at 3 months follow-up, with the exception of perceived behavioral control. The program did not have a significant effect on athletes' attitudes toward concussion reporting and subjective reporting norms. Results suggest that the TPB may be a useful framework to inform the development of more effective educational programs. There is a need for multi-layered interventions that aim to create sporting environments that encourage positive concussion care seeking behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Atletas/educación , Traumatismos en Atletas/prevención & control , Conmoción Encefálica/prevención & control , Conmoción Encefálica/terapia , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Intención , Irlanda , Masculino , Teoría Psicológica , Instituciones Académicas , Factores Sexuales , Deportes , EstudiantesRESUMEN
The results of the first 50 consecutive patients using the Graf stabilisation system are presented. The average age of the patients was 41 years; there were 32 women and 18 men in the group. All patients suffered from intractable symptomatic degenerative disc disease which could be localised to one or more levels. All patients gave a history of chronic back pain, but the mean period of severe disability was 24 months. The mean preoperative disability score (Oswestry questionnaire) was 59%. The average period of follow-up was 24 months (range 19-36 months). At the latest review, the mean disability score was 31%. The clinical results were classified as "excellent" or "good" in 72% of patients, "fair" in 10%, "the same" in 16% and "worse" in 2%. All but three patients felt that surgery was worthwhile. The results have not deteriorated over the period of follow-up.