Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Biomed ; 89(4-S): 55-63, 2018 02 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29644990

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: Procedural pain during Peripheral Venous Catheterization (PVC) is a significant issue for patients. Reducing procedure-induced pain improves the quality of care and reduces patient discomfort. We aimed to compare a non-pharmacological technique (distraction) to anaesthetic cream (EMLA) for the reduction of procedural pain during PVC, in patients undergoing Computerized Tomography (CT) or Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) with contrast. METHODS: This is a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. The study was carried out during the month of October 2015. A total of 72 patients undergoing PVC were randomly assigned to the experimental group (distraction technique, n=36) or control group (EMLA, n=36). After PVC, pain was evaluated by means of the numeric pain-rating scale (NRS). Pain perception was compared by means of Mann-Whitney Test. RESULTS: The average pain in the distraction group was 0.69 (SD±1.26), with a median value of 0. The average pain in the EMLA group was 1.86 (SD±1.73), with a median value of 2. The study showed a significant improvement from the distraction technique (U=347, p<.001, r=.42) with respect to the local anaesthetic in reducing pain perception. Conclusions/Implication for practice: Distraction is more effective than local anaesthetic in reducing of pain-perception during PVC insertion. This study is one of few comparing the distraction technique to an anaesthetic. It confirms that the practitioner-patient relationship is an important point in nursing assistance, allowing the establishment of trust with the patient and increasing compliance during the treatment process.


Asunto(s)
Atención , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Flebotomía/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Miedo , Femenino , Humanos , Combinación Lidocaína y Prilocaína , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroimagen , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/psicología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
BMC Urol ; 16(1): 25, 2016 Jun 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27267961

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nonbacterial prostatitis, together with chronic pelvic pain syndrome, accounts for 90-95 % of prostatitis cases. Anti-inflammatory medications are commonly used to reduce storage/inflammatory symptoms that can deteriorate quality of life. The purpose of this study was to observe the efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate rectal suppositories (Topster®) in inflammations of the lower urinary tract in men. METHODS: Patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic protocols according to current evidence-based practice. Efficacy assessments: voiding parameters, perineal pain, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), digital rectal examination (DRE). Adverse events and patient compliance were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients were enrolled, mean age 52 ± 14.97. Most frequent diagnosis: nonbacterial prostatitis (85 %). All patients completed visits 1 and 2. All patients were treated with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) suppositories, 136/180 also with Serenoa repens (SR) extract. Antibiotics were rarely required. 162/180 patients presented clinically significant improvements and terminated treatment. Mean change vs. baseline in voiding frequency: -3.55 ± 2.70 n/day in patients taking only BDP and -3.68 ± 2.81 n/day in those taking both BDP and SR (P<.0001 in both groups). Uroflowmetry improved significantly; change from baseline 3.26 ± 5.35 ml/s in BDP only group and 5.61 ± 7.32 ml/s in BDP + SR group (P = 0.0002 for BDP, P<.0001 for BDP + SR). Urine stream normal in 35 % of patients at visit 1 and 57.22 % of patients at visit 2. Mean change in perineal pain, on 0-10 VAS, -0.66 ± 2.24 for BDP only group (P = 0.0699) and -1.37 ± 2.40 for BDP + SR group (P<.0001). IPSS increased at visit 2. No adverse events were reported. For all parameters, none of the comparisons between groups was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the drug's good safety profile. We also observed an improvement in the main storage symptoms and clinical findings associated with lower urinary tract inflammation in patients treated with beclomethasone dipropionate suppositories.


Asunto(s)
Beclometasona/administración & dosificación , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Dolor Pélvico/prevención & control , Prostatitis/diagnóstico , Prostatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Beclometasona/efectos adversos , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/complicaciones , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico , Prostatitis/complicaciones , Supositorios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Urology ; 90: 131-5, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26776562

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of penile Doppler ultrasound (PDU) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative diagnostic evaluation of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis on patients presenting with clinical diagnosis of penile squamous cell carcinoma from 6 different European hospitals between 2012 and 2014 was carried out. Each patient who had planned an organ sparing approach underwent an MRI and PDU both with an artificial erection with prostaglandin E 1. Age, evidence of MRI or PDU corpora cavernosa infiltration, frozen section examination report, definitive pathological report, and surgical approach used per patient were recorded. Accuracy, precision, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Outcomes were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 67.35 ± 15.45 (range 51-82). All of the patients were treated surgically. Of the 200 patients, 135 (67.5%) underwent a corpora sparing approach, whereas 65 had a partial penectomy because of the frozen section outcome. About corpora cavernosa infiltration, the definitive outcome confirmed the frozen section examination. PDU vs MRI accuracy was 96.5% vs 90.5%; precision was 92.6% vs 96%; sensitivity was 96.9% vs 73.8%, specificity was 96.2% vs 98.5%. Despite sensitivity (P <.05) no statistical evidence was found between ultrasound and MRI. CONCLUSION: PDU has a statistical similar outcome on detecting infiltration of corpora cavernosa and could be used as a less expensive tool to drive surgical strategy in patient with a diagnosis of penile squamous cell carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias del Pene/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Pene/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA