RESUMEN
Medical students have difficulty understanding the mechanisms underlying hyperkalemia-mediated local control of blood flow. Such control mechanisms are crucial in the brain, kidney, and skeletal muscle vasculature. We aimed to identify medical students' misconceptions via assessment of students' in-class knowledge and, subsequently, improve future teaching of this concept. In-class polling was performed with the TurningPoint clicker response system (n = 860) to gauge students' understanding of three physiological concepts related to hyperkalemia: membrane potential (Vm), conductance, and smooth muscle response. Vm includes the concepts of equilibrium potential (Veq) for specific ions, as well as driving force (DF = Vm - Veq). Students understood the concept of DF (~70% answered correctly), suggesting their understanding of Vm. However, students misunderstood that hyperkalemia results in depolarization (~52% answered correctly) and leads to an increase in potassium conductance (~31% answered correctly). Clarification of the type of smooth muscle as vascular increased the percentage of correct responses (~51 to 73%). The data indicate that students lacked knowledge of specific potassium conductance in various muscle types, resulting in divergent responses, such as the canonical depolarization in skeletal muscle versus hyperpolarization in smooth muscle cells during hyperkalemia. Misunderstanding of this crucial concept of conductance is directly related to the students' performance. Furthermore, we connected the paradoxical effect of hyperkalemia to pathological acute and chronic hyperkalemia clinical scenarios.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hiperpotasemia/fisiopatología , Músculo Liso Vascular/fisiopatología , Fisiología/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Enseñanza/psicología , HumanosRESUMEN
Cervical spine aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) in pediatric patients have not been thoroughly studied. Using PubMed and Google Scholar, a systematic review of the literature was conducted for publications that included patients aged ≤15 years with a confirmed diagnosis of ABC in the cervical spine. Thirty-five studies with a total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Nearly 80% of patients presented with neck or shoulder pain. The axis was the level most frequently involved (34.28%), followed by C5 (24.28%). Posterior elements were most likely to be affected (88.46%) while exclusive involvement of the body was uncommon. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of the literature regarding ABCs of the cervical spine in a pediatric population. Spinal ABCs are rarely found in the cervical region, and their treatment remains challenging due to their location, vascularization, and a high overall recurrence rate even with surgical resection.