Asunto(s)
Organizaciones de Beneficencia/economía , Obtención de Fondos , Donaciones , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Instituciones de Salud/economía , Rol del Médico , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Organizaciones de Beneficencia/ética , Organizaciones de Beneficencia/normas , Confidencialidad , Conflicto de Intereses , Obtención de Fondos/ética , Obtención de Fondos/normas , Donaciones/ética , Guías como Asunto , Instituciones de Salud/ética , Instituciones de Salud/normas , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente/ética , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/ética , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/normas , ConfianzaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Utilization of total knee arthroplasty is increasing rapidly. A substantial number of total knee arthroplasty recipients have persistent pain after surgery. Our objective was to design a randomized controlled trial to establish the efficacy of a motivational-interviewing-based telephone intervention aimed at improving patient outcomes and satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS/DESIGN: The study was conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. The study focused on individuals 40 years or older with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis who were scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. The study compared two management strategies over the first six months postoperatively: 1) enhanced postoperative care with frequent follow-up by a care navigator; 2) usual postoperative care. Those who were randomized into the enhanced postoperative care arm received ten calls from a trained non-clinician care navigator over the first six postoperative months. The navigator used motivational interviewing techniques to engage patients in discussions related to their rehabilitation goals, including patient's plans for and confidence in achieving those goals. Patients in the usual care arm received standard postoperative management and received no navigator phone calls. Patients in both arms were assessed at baseline, three months, and six months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: The primary outcome of the study was improvement in function as measured by the difference in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function score between preoperative (baseline) status and six months postoperatively. Data were collected to identify factors that may be related to total knee arthroplasty outcomes, including preoperative pain, pain catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and depression. A formal economic analysis is also planned to determine the cost-effectiveness of the care navigator as a component of total knee arthroplasty care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01540851.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Entrevista Motivacional , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Navegación de Pacientes , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Adulto , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Boston , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Entrevista Motivacional/economía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/economía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Navegación de Pacientes/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Recuperación de la Función , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Teléfono , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study the risk factors for revision of primary total hip replacement (THR) in a US population-based sample. METHODS: Using Medicare claims, we identified beneficiaries from 29 US states who underwent primary THR between July 1, 1995 and June 30, 1996, with followup through December 31, 2008. Potential cases had International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes indicating a revision THR. Each case was matched by state with 1 control THR recipient who was alive and unrevised when the case had a revision THR. We abstracted hospital records to document potential risk factors. We examined the associations between preoperative factors and revision risk using multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The analysis data set contained 719 of 836 case-control pairs with complete data for analysis variables. The factors associated with higher revision odds in multivariate models were age ≤75 years at primary surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.52 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20-1.92]), height in the highest tertile (OR 1.40 [95% CI 1.06-1.85]), weight in the highest tertile (OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.24-2.22]), cemented femoral component (OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.10-1.87]), prior contralateral primary THR (OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.05-1.76]), other prior orthopedic surgery (OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.13-1.84]), and living with others (versus alone; OR 1.26 [95% CI 0.99-1.61]). CONCLUSION: This first US population-based case-control study of risk factors for revision of primary THR showed that younger, taller, and heavier patients and those receiving a cemented femoral component had a greater likelihood of undergoing a revision THR over a 12-year followup period. Effects of age and body size on revision risk should be addressed by clinicians with patients considering primary THR.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estatura , Índice de Masa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most research on failure leading to revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is reported from single centers. We searched PubMed between January 2000 and August 2010 to identify population- or community-based studies evaluating ten-year revision risks. We report ten-year revision risk using the Kaplan-Meier method, stratifying by age and fixation technique. RESULTS: Thirteen papers met the inclusion criteria. Cemented prostheses had Kaplan-Meier estimates of revision-free implant survival of ten years ranging from 88% to 95%; uncemented prostheses had Kaplan-Meier estimates from 80% to 85%. Estimates ranged from 72% to 86% in patients less than 60 years old and from 90 to 96% in older patients. CONCLUSION: Data reported from national registries suggest revision risks of 5 to 20% ten years following primary THA. Revision risks are lower in older THA recipients. Uncemented implants may have higher ten-year rates of revision, regardless of age.