RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction by means of a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in combination with a prosthesis is a well-established technique. Previous published series have highlighted significant rates of local complications, including capsular contracture. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap reconstructions performed between 2000 and 2010 was undertaken. A standardized preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative clinical protocol was applied to all cases, which included the use of textured, cohesive-gel silicone implants. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven procedures were performed in 243 patients, with one-third being immediate reconstructions. The mean age at reconstruction was 50.4 years. Mean follow-up was 47 months, and 3.6 percent of patients developed Baker grade III capsular contracture requiring capsulotomy. Chemotherapy provided a protective effect (p = 0.0197) against capsular contracture formation. Previous radiotherapy had no significant influence on symptomatic capsule formation. The rate of infection requiring implant removal was 1.1 percent, and 0.7 percent of mastectomy scars showed evidence of recurrent disease. CONCLUSION: The use of textured, cohesive-gel silicone implants, combined with a standardized surgical approach, can reduce complications in the short- and long-term postoperative period, independent of radiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Contractura Capsular en Implantes/etiología , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Esquelético/trasplante , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is some debate in the recent literature regarding the routine submission of mastectomy scars for histologic analysis when performing delayed breast reconstructions. The aim of this study was to review the relevant publications and evaluate the practice of routine histologic examination of mastectomy scars. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review, across three regional plastic and reconstructive surgery units, of 433 patients who had 455 scars routinely sent for histologic examination following delayed breast reconstruction between January of 2000 and December of 2006. Patients with clinical evidence of recurrent carcinoma were excluded. RESULTS: Data from 433 patients revealed an average age at reconstruction of 49.9 years (range, 25 to 77 years). The mean interval from primary breast surgery to reconstruction was 3.9 years (range, 2 months to 32 years), and the average length of patient follow-up, from primary surgery, was 6.4 years (range, 1 to 40 years). The majority of the initial operations were carried out for invasive carcinoma (89 percent). Four mastectomy scars in three patients were positive for carcinoma recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The publications related to the practice of routine histologic analysis of mastectomy scars provide conflicting conclusions. As a proportion of patients may benefit from the early detection and treatment of locoregional recurrence, the authors suggest that the routine submission of mastectomy scars will allow for the earlier detection of soft-tissue recurrences that may affect long-term outcome. In keeping with cancer surgery principles, the authors recommend routine histologic examination of mastectomy scars following delayed breast reconstruction.