RESUMEN
Introducción: A pesar de los avances en las técnicas de imagen, en muchos casos son insuficientes para establecer el diagnóstico de las lesiones quísticas pancreáticas (LQP). Son escasas las publicaciones en nuestro medio que evalúan la combinación de varios métodos obtenidos mediante la punción aspirativa con aguja fina con ultrasonografía endoscópica (USE-PAAF). El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la utilidad global de la USE-PAAF en el diagnóstico de las LQP. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo a partir de una base de datos actualizada prospectivamente de una cohorte de pacientes remitidos para USE-PAAF por LQP. Se estudió la sensibilidad, la especificidad, el rendimiento diagnóstico del antígeno carcinoembrionario (CEA), la citología y la viscosidad para detectar lesiones mucinosas. Resultados: Desde noviembre de 2013 a abril del 2018 se realizaron 122 USE por LQP. Se realizó USE-PAAF en 94/122 (77%) y se intervinieron 21/122 (17,2%) pacientes. Se incluyeron 33/122 pacientes que tuvieron confirmación diagnóstica mediante histología, imagen (quiste seroso con patrón típico) o evolución clínica. El estudio de la curva ROC determinó el punto de corte ≥419ng/ml para diferenciar lesión quística mucinosa/no mucinosa. El rendimiento diagnóstico del CEA fue del 87,5% (21/24), de la citología del 81,8% (27/33) y de la viscosidad del 84,4% (27/32). Los 3 parámetros en combinación obtuvieron el mejor resultado (30/33, 90,9%). Conclusión: La combinación del análisis del CEA, la citología y la viscosidad del líquido pancreático obtenido mediante USE-PAAF aumenta el rendimiento en el diagnóstico de las lesiones quísticas pancreáticas mucinosas, siendo superior al 90%
Introduction: Despite advances in imaging techniques, in many cases they are insufficient to establish the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL). There are few publications in our setting that evaluate the combination of several methods obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of the study was to evaluate the overall utility of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of PCL. Material and methods: Retrospective study based on a database updated prospectively of a cohort of patients referred for EUS-FNA due to PCL detected in an imaging test. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic yield of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytology and viscosity were studied to detect mucinous lesions. Results: From November 2013 to April 2018, 122 EUS were performed for PCL. EUS-FNA was performed in 94/122 (77%) and 21/122 (17.2%) patients were operated on. We included 33/122 patients who had diagnostic confirmation by histology, imaging (serous cyst with typical pattern) or clinical evolution. The study of the ROC curve determined the cutoff point ≥419 ng/ml to differentiate mucinous/non-mucinous cystic lesions. The diagnostic yield of CEA was 87.5% (21/24), cytology 81.8% (27/33) and viscosity 84.4% (27/32). The three parameters in combination obtained the best result (30/33, 90.9%). Conclusion: The combination of CEA analysis, cytology and viscosity of pancreatic fluid obtained by EUS-FNA increases the performance in the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions, with it being greater than 90%
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/administración & dosificación , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/métodos , Quiste Pancreático/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/diagnóstico , Curva ROC , EndosonografíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in imaging techniques, in many cases they are insufficient to establish the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL). There are few publications in our setting that evaluate the combination of several methods obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of the study was to evaluate the overall utility of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of PCL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study based on a database updated prospectively of a cohort of patients referred for EUS-FNA due to PCL detected in an imaging test. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic yield of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytology and viscosity were studied to detect mucinous lesions. RESULTS: From November 2013 to April 2018, 122 EUS were performed for PCL. EUS-FNA was performed in 94/122 (77%) and 21/122 (17.2%) patients were operated on. We included 33/122 patients who had diagnostic confirmation by histology, imaging (serous cyst with typical pattern) or clinical evolution. The study of the ROC curve determined the cutoff point ≥419 ng/ml to differentiate mucinous/non-mucinous cystic lesions. The diagnostic yield of CEA was 87.5% (21/24), cytology 81.8% (27/33) and viscosity 84.4% (27/32). The three parameters in combination obtained the best result (30/33, 90.9%). CONCLUSION: The combination of CEA analysis, cytology and viscosity of pancreatic fluid obtained by EUS-FNA increases the performance in the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions, with it being greater than 90%.