RESUMEN

Dengue is one of the commonest causes of undifferentiated acute febrile illness in India as well as South East Asia. Nearly two-fifths of the world population is at risk of infection, and nearly 96 million infections reported worldwide, it is a major cause of concern across the globe. The ISCCM leadership felt that there have been no new directives/guidelines except the MOH guidelines for the management of dengue fever since 2014. Under the auspices of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), an expert group of 14 intensivists from across the country, was formed. The task force members formulated questions that needed to be answered. These questions were validated by the members of ISCCM attending research conclave 2023. All the members systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Science Direct for original articles on different aspects of dengue management between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2023. From the collected articles, duplicates were removed. Based on the evidence collected, the expert group members prepared statements/answers to the questions. Since most of the evidence is of moderate to low quality, a consensus was generated amongst the members of the task force. Each statement was agreed upon by 70% of the task force. The statements presented in the article are consensus statements as answers to queries raised. How to cite this article: Bhalla A, Singh H, Suri V, Yaddanapudi L, Poddar B, Ghawat R, et al. ISCCM Position Statement: Management of Severe Dengue in Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S42-S58.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the paucity of high-quality studies on longitudinal basic critical care echocardiography (BCCE) training, expert opinion guidelines have guided BCCE competence educational standards and processes. However, existing guidelines lack precise detail due to methodological flaws during guideline development. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: To formulate methodologically robust guidelines on BCCE training using evidence and expert opinion, detailing specific criteria for every step, we conducted a modified Delphi process using the principles of the validated AGREE-II tool. Based on systematic reviews, the following domains were chosen: components of a longitudinal BCCE curriculum; pass-grade criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation; and formative/summative assessment and final competence processes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between April 2020 and May 2021, a total of 21 BCCE experts participated in four rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 used five web-based questionnaires, including branching-logic software for directed questions to individual panelists. In round 3 (videoconference), the panel finalized the recommendations by vote. During the journal peer-review process, Round 4 was conducted as Web-based questionnaires. Following each round, the agreement threshold for each item was determined as ≥ 80% for item inclusion and ≤ 30% for item exclusion. RESULTS: Following rounds 1 and 2, agreement was reached on 62 of 114 items. To the 49 unresolved items, 12 additional items were added in round 3, with 56 reaching agreement and five items remaining unresolved. There was agreement that longitudinal BCCE training must include introductory training, mentored formative training, summative assessment for competence, and final cognitive assessment. Items requiring multiple rounds included two-dimensional views, Doppler, cardiac output, M-mode measurement, minimum scan numbers, and pass-grade criteria. Regarding objective criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation quality, the panel agreed on maintaining the same criteria for formative and summative assessment, to categorize BCCE findings as major vs minor and a standardized approach to errors, criteria for readiness for summative assessment, and supervisory options. INTERPRETATION: In conclusion, this expert consensus statement presents comprehensive evidence-based recommendations on longitudinal BCCE training. However, these recommendations require prospective validation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

How to cite this article: Prabu RN. Long-term Survival after Critical Illness: Are We There Yet? Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(10):1065-1066.

RESUMEN

How to cite this article: Prabu RN, Kothekar AT. Using Transthoracic Echocardiography to Predict Fluid Responsiveness after Passive Leg Raising Test: Caution Needed. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(11):1147-1148.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The oncologists are treating cancer more aggressively, leading to increase in number of pediatric admissions to the ICU. Due to anatomical and physiological differences, pediatric patients are at high risk of complications during intubation. We evaluated the incidence of complications during intubations in pediatric patients in our ICU. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of complications occurring during intubation in 42 pediatric patients. All intubations were orotracheal. We recorded number of attempts at intubation, need for use of intubation adjuncts and complications during laryngoscopy and intubation. The incidence of difficult intubation, hypoxia, and severe cardiovascular collapse was also noted. RESULTS: Complications occurred during 13 (31%) intubations. Hypoxia and severe cardiovascular collapse occurred in during 7 (16.7%) intubations each, while 4 patients (9.5%) (n=4) had cardiac arrest during intubation. Thirty three (78.6%) intubations were successful in first attempt and difficult intubation was recorded in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: Critically ill pediatric cancer patients have a high rate of complications during intubation.