RESUMEN

Amblyopia is a disorder of visual acuity in one eye, thought to arise from suppression by the other eye during development of the visual cortex. In the attentional blink, the second of two targets (T2) in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) stream is difficult to detect and identify when it appears shortly but not immediately after the first target (T1). We investigated the attentional blink seen through amblyopic eyes and found that it was less finely tuned in time than when the 12 amblyopic observers viewed the stimuli with their preferred eyes. T2 performance was slightly better through amblyopic eyes two frames after T1 but worse one frame after T1. Previously (A. V. Popple & D. M. Levi, 2007), we showed that when the targets were red letters in a stream of gray letters (or vice versa), normal observers frequently confused T2 with the letters before and after it (neighbor errors). Observers viewing through their amblyopic eyes made significantly fewer neighbor errors and more T2 responses consisting of letters that were never presented. In normal observers, T1 (on the rare occasions when it was reported incorrectly) was often confused with the letter immediately after it. Viewing through their amblyopic eyes, observers with amblyopia made more responses to the letter immediately before T1. These results suggest that childhood suppression of the input from amblyopic eyes disrupts attentive processing. We hypothesize reduced connectivity between monocularly tuned lower visual areas, subcortical structures that drive foveal attention, and more frontal regions of the brain responsible for letter recognition and working memory. Perhaps when viewing through their amblyopic eyes, the observers were still processing the letter identity of a prior distractor when the color flash associated with the target was detected. After T1, unfocused temporal attention may have bound together erroneously the features of succeeding letters, resulting in the appearance of letters that were not actually presented. These findings highlight the role of early (monocular) visual processes in modulating the attentional blink, as well as the role of attention in amblyopic visual deficits.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In the attentional blink [Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849-860.], the second of two targets in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) stream is difficult to detect and identify when it is presented soon but not immediately after the first target. We varied the Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA) of the items in the stream and the color of the targets (red from gray or vice versa), and looked at the responses to the second target. Exact responses to the second target (zero positional error) showed a typical attentional blink profile, with a drop in performance for an interval of 200-500 ms after the first target. Approximate responses (positional error no greater than 3 frames) showed no such drop in performance, although results were still dependent on color (better for red) and increased with increasing SOA. These findings are consistent with a two-stage model of visual working memory, where encoding of the first target disrupts attention to (and temporal binding of) the second target. We suggest that this disruption occurs within a certain time (approximately 0.5 s) after the first target, during which period salient distractors are as likely as the second target to enter working memory.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In normal vision, three contrast patches containing black and white bars are aligned more precisely when the bars are collinear across the patches [Popple, A., Polat, U., & Bonneh, Y. (2001). Collinear effects on 3-Gabor alignment as a function of spacing, orientation and detectability. Spatial Vision, 14(2), 139-150]. Normally, offsets between the bars in successive patches make the configuration appear tilted, but this effect is reduced in amblyopia [Popple, A. V., & Levi, D. M. (2000). Amblyopes see true alignment where normal observers see illusory tilt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 97(21), 11667-11672]. Our aim was to examine whether collinear bars nonetheless improve the precision of alignment in amblyopia. In a sample of 13 amblyopes, we found that collinear bars did indeed improve the precision of alignment in amblyopia, although both alignment bias and thresholds were higher in the amblyopic eyes for both collinear and non-collinear bars.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The abundant literature on crowding offers fairly simple explanations for the phenomenon, such as position uncertainty or feature pooling, but convincing evidence to support these explanations is lacking. In part, this is because the stimuli used for crowding studies are usually letters or other complex shapes, which makes it hard to determine exactly what kind of information is lost. In our experiment, we asked observers to identify simultaneously the slants (left or right) of three horizontally aligned Gabor targets. The targets were presented at 6 degrees in the periphery, and their size and separation were chosen to incur strong crowding. The loss of information about the position or orientation of individual members of the Gabor triads does not explain our results. Instead, crowding appears to be a particular form of collective information loss. Firstly, the outmost target was crowded much less than the other targets, which rules out explanations based on simple pooling and shows that crowding has a pronounced foveal directionality. Secondly, the specific pattern of confusion shown by all the observers indicates that the only reliable information available to them was orientation contrast, that is, the number (and, to a lesser degree, the location) of sites where slant changed. Thus, crowding appears to spare only the most salient peripheral information, which supports the hypothesis that crowding is caused by limitations of attentional resolution.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Crowding and surround suppression share many similarities, which suggests the possibility of a common mechanism. Despite decades of research, there has been little effort to compare the two phenomena in a consistent fashion. A recent study by D. M. Levi, S. Hariharan, and S. A. Klein (2002) argues that the two are unrelated because crowding effects can be much stronger than suppression effects. Here we report experiments in which the same Gabor target was used both for orientation identification (crowding) and contrast detection (suppression) tasks. In agreement with early crowding studies (e.g., H. Bouma, 1973) we found, that an outward mask is much more effective than an inward mask for the orientation identification task. Notably, no such anisotropy was observed for the contrast detection task, commonly used to measure surround suppression. The anisotropic masking, which defines crowding, is observed only at fine scales (roughly within an octave of the acuity limit), whereas surround suppression is observed at all scales. Our results demonstrate that surround suppression and crowding are indeed two distinct phenomena. We used this characteristic anisotropy to show that a popular crowding paradigm in which target contrast is varied to measure crowding is confounding it with surround suppression. Surround suppression apparently dominates at low contrasts, which would explain some of the reported similarities between the two phenomena.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

An odd-one-out stimulus, such as a vertical bar among horizontals, pops out from the background and is easily detected, but its location may be slightly ambiguous. Four observers were asked to pinpoint these stimuli on thousands of trials, in 5 x 5 and 9 x 9 arrays of Gabor patches. We found they made frequent errors toward neighbors of the target. Over a range of performance from 41% to 96% correct, the frequency of neighbor errors was well described by a linear function of the total error frequency, a function that might result from mixing together two spatial distributions--one broad, the other narrow. We suggest that these represent two sources of error in pop-out localization; one might correspond to a higher visual area with imprecise retinotopic mapping, and the other to a more fine-grained localization process in primary visual cortex.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Amblyopia, a major cause of vision loss, is a developmental disorder of visual perception commonly associated with strabismus (squint). Although defined by a reduction in visual acuity, severe distortions of perceived visual location are common in strabismic amblyopia. These distortions can help us understand the cortical coding of visual location and its development in normal vision, as well as in amblyopia. The history of retinotopic mapping in the visual cortex highlights the potential impact of amblyopia. Theories of amblyopia include topological disarray of receptors in primary visual cortex, undersampling from the amblyopic eye compared with normal eyes, and the presence of anomalous retinal correspondence or multiple cortical representations of the strabismic fovea. We examined the distortions in a strabismic amblyope, using a pop-out localization task, in which normal observers made errors dependent on the visual context of the stimulus. The localization errors of the strabismic amblyope were abnormal. We found that none of the available theories could fully explain this one patient's localization performance. Instead, the observed behavior suggests that multiple adaptations of the underlying cortical topology are possible simultaneously in different parts of the visual field.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Spatial order is the organizing principle of the visual areas in the brain. But to what extent does this spatial mapping help us see where things are? Observers trained to perfectly recall the spatial order of seven items presented simultaneously for 5 s were asked to report their order when flashed for only 150 ms. We found that the capacity for perceiving the order of these brief stimuli was limited by their spacing. Five or six widely-spaced stimuli were seen in the correct order, but only four crowded stimuli. Regardless of spacing and set-size, confusions between neighbors were unexpectedly frequent, suggesting there is positional as well as object uncertainty.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The perceived orientation of a Gabor-patch contour is determined, in part, by shifts in carrier phase between the patches [Popple, A. V. & Sagi, D., 2000. A Fraser illusion without local cues? Vision Research, 40, 873-878; Popple, A. V. & Levi, D. M., 2000a. A new illusion demonstrates long-range processing. Vision Research, 40, 2545-2549; Popple, A. V. & Levi, D. M., 2000b. Amblyopes see true alignment where normal observers see illusory tilt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 11667-11672]. Here we show that perceived orientation results from the combination of at least three stimulus cues: (1) patch orientation, (2) contour envelope orientation, and (3) between-patches orientation, which is a function of phase-shifts. In a series of three experiments, we investigated how these three cues were combined. The data are consistent with weighted cue combination.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Observers are able to locate precisely a border defined by changes in texture orientation. The prevailing theory is that such localization takes place using a hierarchical, filter-rectify-filter mechanism. An alternative theory is that contextual modulation causes the border elements to stand out. Here we show that perceived border location is inconsistent with contextual modulation from iso-oriented elements. The perceived location of a vertical border defined by vertical texture on one side, and horizontal texture on the other side, is biased towards the vertical texture. We found the same bias in a single row of texture. Therefore, the bias is not due to contextual influences from surrounding iso-oriented elements. Contextual influences between cross-oriented elements can explain the data.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The twisted-cord illusion is a powerful demonstration of interaction between 1st-order (luminance-defined) and 2nd-order (contrast-defined) orientation processing. The perceived orientation of contrast-defined objects is pulled towards their 1st-order orientation content when the difference in orientation is small (Fraser effect), yet is pushed away from the 1st-order content at large orientation differences (Zöllner effect). Here we show that the relative spatial scale of carrier and envelope represents a decisive factor in determining the magnitude and direction of such interactions. We conclude that the perceived 2nd-order structure of a stimulus is biased by the properties of the 1st-order structure in a manner that depends on relative, rather than absolute spatial scale.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We show that a broad class of visual illusions, including illusory motion, can be explained by the effects of negative afterimages. Two new illusions, illusory shading and illusory tilting, are devised on the basis of the proposed explanation. The general feature of these illusions is an alternation between a high-contrast (white or black) and a low-contrast (gray) local input signal, which can be caused either by eye motion over patterns of varied luminance or by a change in such patterns over time. A simple model of the local signal dynamics qualitatively reproduces the illusory effects by adding the negative afterimage to the original visual stimulus.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In visual search tasks with a near-threshold target amongst distracters, log detection thresholds rise in proportion to the log of the number of stimuli. Previous research has shown a very steep slope for this set-size effect where the target is a change in spatial frequency (SF) across an ISI, suggesting a low-level explanation for 'change blindness (Wright et al., 2000). Here, we analyse stimulus and task variables in order to determine the contributions of stimulus detection and attention processes. Stimuli consisted of two 150 ms frames each containing 1 to 4 Gabor targets, with an ISI of 250 ms. In a 2AFC detection task with uniform distracters, slopes of 0.23-0.52 were found, in line with visual search results. 2AFC SF discrimination tasks gave slopes of 0.68, 0.69 with homogeneous distracters and 0.76-0.96 with inhomogeneous distracters, consistent with averaging of stimuli within a frame. If the distracters were also made to change across ISI, averaging was impossible, and focal attention was required to solve the discrimination. This always gave set-size slopes > 1. It is concluded that, under conditions where a stimulus array can be analysed globally, change detection performance is limited by signal detection mechanisms, rather than limited capacity attention or memory mechanisms. However, where this is prevented, for example by changing more than one item, limitations due to attention or memory produce an even steeper set-size effect.

Asunto(s)