RESUMEN
Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are a group of neurodevelopmental pathologies characterized by social and communication deficits, for which treatments are limited. Cell therapies, including intrathecal (IT) administration of bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells (BM-MNC), improves symptoms in patients with ASD. Twenty-four patients diagnosed with ASD, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Text Revision Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TR) criteria, were autologously treated with IT BM-MNC, and the clinical effect was evaluated using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) on Days 30 (n=24) and 180 (n=14) post-treatment. IT BM-MNC improved clinical outcomes by Day 30 (p=0.0039), and those benefits remained and were further accentuated by Day 180 post-treatment (n=14; p=<0.0001). Clinical benefit at Days 30 (p=0.001; r= -0.51) and 180 (p=0.01; r= -0.60) posttreatment positively correlated with the enrichment of a putative BM stem cell population expressing the cluster of differentiation 133+ (CD133+) surface marker.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QoL) has been included as a marker of treatment effectiveness in pediatric patients with chronic diseases. We believe that frequent multidisciplinary interventions and patient education could lead to an improvement in QoL. AIMS: Determine the QoL and economic impact of monthly interventions in multidisciplinary treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Haemo-QoL questionnaire was applied to patients who attended the hemophilia center of the University Hospital "Dr. José Eleuterio González," Monterrey, Mexico, at the time of enrollment and 1 year later. RESULTS: Male patients between 4 and 16 years diagnosed with hemophilia were included. The score results presented are based on Haemo-QoL versions that classify patients by their age group: group 1 (4 to 7 y) and group 2 (8 to 12 y). Statistical significant improvement was observed in the overall score (sociodemographic, psychosocial, etc.) after 1 year of follow-up in both groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Impact on the QoL of patients receiving this approach was favorable. Improvement was observed regardless of severity and in those who were already in prophylaxis, suggesting that this type of approach could be causing the improvement. Results support the application of multidisciplinary treatment as the gold standard, and it should be considered in all centers including those with limited resources.