RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A single administration of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) has been shown to reduce lung inflammation in experimental elastase-induced emphysema; however, effects were limited in terms of lung-tissue repair and cardiac function improvement. We hypothesized that two doses of MSCs could induce further lung and cardiovascular repair by mitigating inflammation and remodeling in a model of emphysema induced by multiple elastase instillations. We aimed to comparatively investigate the effects of one versus two doses of MSCs, administered 1 week apart, in a murine model of elastase-induced emphysema. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into control (CTRL) and emphysema (E) groups. Mice in the E group received porcine pancreatic elastase (0.2 IU, 50 µL) intratracheally once weekly for four consecutive weeks; the CTRL animals received sterile saline (50 µL) using the same protocol. Three hours after the last instillation, the E group was further randomized to receive either saline (SAL) or murine MSCs (105 cells) intratracheally, in one or two doses (1 week apart). Fourteen days later, mice were euthanized, and all data analyzed. RESULTS: Both one and two doses of MSCs improved lung mechanics, reducing keratinocyte-derived chemokine and transforming growth factor-ß levels in lung homogenates, total cell and macrophage counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and collagen fiber content in airways and blood vessels, as well as increasing vascular endothelial growth factor in lung homogenates and elastic fiber content in lung parenchyma. However, only the two-dose group exhibited reductions in tumor necrosis factor-α in lung tissue, BALF neutrophil and lymphocyte count, thymus weight, and total cellularity, as well as CD8+ cell counts and cervical lymph node CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts, as well as further increased elastic fiber content in the lung parenchyma and reduced severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of MSCs enhanced lung repair and improvement in cardiac function, while inducing T cell immunosuppression, mainly of CD8+ cells, in elastase-induced emphysema.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Cardiovascular/patología , Pulmón/patología , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/citología , Enfisema Pulmonar/terapia , Cicatrización de Heridas , Animales , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar , Sistema Cardiovascular/fisiopatología , Colágeno/metabolismo , Elastina/biosíntesis , Femenino , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Inflamación/patología , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Tejido Linfoide/patología , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Enfisema Pulmonar/patología , Enfisema Pulmonar/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Administering anesthetics to the obese population requires caution because of a variety of reasons including possible interactions with the inflammatory process observed in obese patients. Propofol and dexmedetomidine have protective effects on pulmonary function and are widely used in short- and long-term sedation, particularly in intensive care unit settings in lean and obese subjects. However, the functional and biological effects of these drugs in obesity require further elucidation. In a model of diet-induced obesity, we compared the short-term effects of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on lung mechanics and histology, as well as biological markers of inflammation and oxidative stress modulation in obesity. METHODS: Wistar rats (n = 56) were randomly fed a standard diet (lean) or experimental diet (obese) for 12 weeks. After this period, obese animals received sodium thiopental intraperitoneally and were randomly allocated into 4 subgroups: (1) nonventilated (n = 4) for molecular biology analysis only (control); (2) sodium thiopental (n = 8); (3) propofol (n = 8); and (4) dexmedetomidine (n = 8), which received continuous IV administration of the corresponding agents and were mechanically ventilated (tidal volume = 6 mL/kg body weight, fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.4, positive end-expiratory pressure = 3 cm H2O) for 1 hour. RESULTS: Compared with lean animals, obese rats did not present increased body weight but had higher total body and trunk fat percentages, airway resistance, and interleukin-6 levels in the lung tissue (P = 0.02, P = 0.0027, and P = 0.01, respectively). In obese rats, propofol, but not dexmedetomidine, yielded increased airway resistance, bronchoconstriction index (P = 0.016, P = 0.02, respectively), tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6 levels, as well as lower levels of nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2 and glutathione peroxidase (P = 0.001, Bonferroni-corrected t test). CONCLUSIONS: In this model of diet-induced obesity, a 1-hour propofol infusion yielded increased airway resistance, atelectasis, and lung inflammation, with depletion of antioxidative enzymes. However, unlike sodium thiopental and propofol, short-term infusion of dexmedetomidine had no impact on lung morphofunctional and biological variables.