Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(31): e26854, 2021 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397861

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Prompted by the need to measure the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 on main areas of quality of life related to mental health (MH), the COV-19-impact on quality of life (COV19-QoL) scale has been developed recently. We measured how patients seeking face-to-face MH care perceived the coronavirus disease 2019 impact on QoL and how socio-demographic factors, stress, and personality contributed to QoL in this diagnostically diverse population.Patients aged 18 to 65 years (n = 251) who came for the first time to the outpatient units during the 6-week index-period (May 21-July 1, 2020) were included. The cross-sectional assessment involved sociodemographic variables, working diagnosis, personality traits (7-dimension model, including HEXACO and DELTA), stress (list of threatening experiences and proximity to virus), and COV19-QoL.The perceived impact of the pandemic on QoL was above the theoretical mean of a 5-point scale (COV19-Qol = 3.1 ±â€Š1.2). No association between total COV19-QoL score, sociodemographic parameters, and working diagnoses was found in the present sample. After testing whether positional (threatening experiences), or dispositional (personality) factors were predominant in the perceived impact of COV-19 on QoL, significant predictors of the outcome were personality traits Disintegration (B = 0.52; P < .01) and Emotionality (B = 0.18; P < .05).It seems that pervasiveness and uncertainty of the pandemic threat triggers-especially in those high on Disintegration trait-a chain of mental events with the decrease of QoL as a final result. Present findings could be used to establish a profile of MH help seeking population in relation to this biological disaster, and to further explore QoL and personality in different contexts.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Aislamiento Social/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Cephalalgia ; 41(9): 959-967, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33938250

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of the present study was to establish annual prevalence of primary headaches, migraine, and tension-type headache among adults in a post-conflict area of Serbia. METHODS: The data for this cross-sectional study was obtained via face-to-face interviews using questionnaires specifically designed for this purpose, in line with the available guidelines. The study sample included adults aged 18-65 years whose native language is Serbian with residence in six predominantly Serbian communities in Kosovo and Metohija. Relevant diagnoses were established according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. RESULTS: The study included 1062 adults. Analyses indicated 47.7% prevalence of primary headaches. The 1-year prevalence of migraine (with aura and without aura) and tension-type headache was established at 15.2% (3.3% and 11.9%), and 32.2%, respectively. One-year prevalence of chronic headache was calculated at 3.5%, while the prevalence of medication overuse headache was slightly lower at 2.9%. Primary headaches were more prevalent among women, participants residing south of the river Ibar, married or cohabiting individuals, as well as among interviewees (persons) who reported feeling unsafe in Kosovo and Metohija. This is the first study of the prevalence of primary headache disorders in Serbia. The obtained data is comparable to the data available for other countries, especially those in the Balkan region.


Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Primarias/epidemiología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Cefalea , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Serbia/epidemiología
3.
Pain Med ; 21(11): 3012-3017, 2020 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32918482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that increased cerebrovascular reactivity might be a feature of patients who have migraine with aura (MwA). The correlation between the clinical presentation of migraine with aura and transcranial Doppler parameters remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to explore cerebral blood flow, vascular resistance, and cerebrovascular reactivity in women MwA. Also, the relationships between hemodynamic conditions and aura characteristics are examined. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Headache Center, Neurology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia. SUBJECTS: Fifty-four women MwA and 49 healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: Transcranial Doppler sonography examination was used to determine blood flow mean velocity (MV) and pulsatility index (PI), as well as breath-holding index (BHI), in 15 arterial segments comprising the circle of Willis. RESULTS: A total of 54 women MwA and 49 HCs were studied. The PIs of all segments of the left and right middle cerebral arteries and the left and right anterior cerebral arteries were significantly higher in MwA with regards to HCs. Also, both the left and right BHIs were significantly higher in MwA than HCs. In addition, MVs of the right vertebral artery and the first segment of the basilar artery were significantly lower in MwA than HCs. Longer duration of migraine aura showed a weak negative correlation with the PI of the left posterior cerebral artery. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest increased vessel pulsatility, abnormal cerebrovascular reactivity, and decreased cerebral blood flow velocity in several arterial segments of the Willis circle in women MwA.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Migraña con Aura , Arterias Cerebrales , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Migraña con Aura/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler Transcraneal
4.
J Headache Pain ; 17(1): 111, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27933580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The study was a collaboration between Lifting The Burden (LTB) and the European Headache Federation (EHF). Its aim was to evaluate the implementation of quality indicators for headache care Europe-wide in specialist headache centres (level-3 according to the EHF/LTB standard). METHODS: Employing previously-developed instruments in 14 such centres, we made enquiries, in each, of health-care providers (doctors, nurses, psychologists, physiotherapists) and 50 patients, and analysed the medical records of 50 other patients. Enquiries were in 9 domains: diagnostic accuracy, individualized management, referral pathways, patient's education and reassurance, convenience and comfort, patient's satisfaction, equity and efficiency of the headache care, outcome assessment and safety. RESULTS: Our study showed that highly experienced headache centres treated their patients in general very well. The centres were content with their work and their patients were content with their treatment. Including disability and quality-of-life evaluations in clinical assessments, and protocols regarding safety, proved problematic: better standards for these are needed. Some centres had problems with follow-up: many specialised centres operated in one-touch systems, without possibility of controlling long-term management or the success of treatments dependent on this. CONCLUSIONS: This first Europe-wide quality study showed that the quality indicators were workable in specialist care. They demonstrated common trends, producing evidence of what is majority practice. They also uncovered deficits that might be remedied in order to improve quality. They offer the means of setting benchmarks against which service quality may be judged. The next step is to take the evaluation process into non-specialist care (EHF/LTB levels 1 and 2).


Asunto(s)
Cefalea/terapia , Personal de Salud/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Centros de Atención Secundaria/normas , Especialización/normas , Centros de Atención Terciaria/normas , Adulto , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta
5.
Srp Arh Celok Lek ; 144(1-2): 6-9, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27276851

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral ischemic small-vessel disease (SVD), causing lacunar infarcts and white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a progressive disease associated with an increased risk of stroke, dementia and death. Increased arterial stiffness has been associated with ischemic stroke and cerebral SVD independently of common vascular risk factors. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze arterial stiffness in our patients with symptomatic SVD. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study design we included 30 patients with clinical and MRI evidence of cerebral SVD and 30 age-, gender- and risk factor-matched control subjects with no neurological diseases. Patients were evaluated at the Ultrasound Laboratory at the Neurology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade, during a three-month period (from September 1st to December 1st 2012). Baseline demographic and vascular risk factors were recorded. All patients underwent standard carotid ultrasound scans with measuring of intima-media thickness (IMT) and analysis of atheromatous plaques. Internal carotid artery stiffness was evaluated with the use of e-tracking option as beta stiffness index (BSI) value. RESULTS: There were no differences between study groups in regard to degree of carotid stenosis and type of carotid plaques (p > 0.05). Patients in SVD group had significantly higher mean IMT (p = 0.0093) and mean BSI (p < 0.0001) than subjects in the control group. No significant correlation was detected between IMT and BSI in SVD group (r = 0.168; p = 0.376). Brain lesions severity correlated with BSI (r = 0.733; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Arterial stiffness is increased in symptomatic patients with SVD, independently of vascular risk factors and IMT.


Asunto(s)
Arterias Carótidas , Enfermedades de los Pequeños Vasos Cerebrales , Rigidez Vascular/fisiología , Anciano , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Carótidas/patología , Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedades de los Pequeños Vasos Cerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Pequeños Vasos Cerebrales/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Pequeños Vasos Cerebrales/patología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Vojnosanit Pregl ; 72(8): 710-3, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26495697

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The association between the right-to-left shunt (RLS) and migraine with aura (MA) has been proven so far. The aim of this study was to determine if the presence of RLS detected as a result of transcranial doppler (TCD) bubble-test, makes any difference in clinical presentation, aura and headache in patients with MA. METHODS: A single-group descriptive study was conducted on 153 patients diagnosed with MA. TCD bubble-test was performed on 135 of them. The recorded demographic and clinical features of patients were analyzed and compared with the results of the TCD bubble test. RESULTS: In the group of 135 patients, 88 (65.2%) had positive TCD bubble-test. The difference in the investigated clinical features of patients of the patients and aura between the patients with and without RLS, was not found. CONCLUSION: The results of our study confirm a high prevalence of right-to-left shunt in patients with MA, but the clinical relevance of this association was not shown.


Asunto(s)
Migraña con Aura/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía Doppler Transcraneal/métodos , Adulto , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Migraña con Aura/etiología , Migraña con Aura/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adulto Joven
8.
Cephalalgia ; 34(9): 664-670, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24445197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The age of onset of cluster headache (CH) attacks most commonly is between 20 and 40 years old, although CH has been reported in all age groups. There is increasing evidence of CH with early or late onset and a different course of the disorder. The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of the age of onset on clinical features, disorder course, and therapy effectiveness in CH patients. METHODS: A retrospective and cross-sectional analysis was performed on 182 CH patients divided into three groups according to the age of onset. The first group consisted of patients with the first CH attack before 20 years of age, the second group was patients with age of onset between 20 and 40 years of age, and the third group was patients with age of onset after 40 years of age. Demographic data, features of CH periods and attacks, and the response to standardized treatment were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Patients with CH onset after 40 years of age reported a lower number of autonomic features and less frequently had conjunctival injection and nasal congestion/rhinorrhea phenomena during their attacks. Diagnostic delay was the longest in the patients with CH onset before 20 years of age. CONCLUSION: The influence of the age of onset of CH is intriguing for further studies and could possibly extend the knowledge about CH pathophysiology. From a clinical point of view, the differences in CH presentation are insufficient to preclude a correct diagnosis and treatment because the same criteria could be applied regardless of patient age.

9.
Headache ; 53(9): 1464-9, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23534887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders diagnostic criteria, the differences between migraine and cluster headache (CH) are clear. In addition to headache attack duration and pain characteristics, the symptoms accompanying headache represent the key features in a differential diagnosis of these 2 primary headache disorders. Just a few studies of patients with CH exist examining the presence of nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia, and aura, the features commonly accompanying migraine headache. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of migraine-like features (MF) in patients with CH and establish the significance of these phenomena related to other clinical features and response to treatment. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five patients with CH were studied, and 24.5% of them experienced at least one of MF during every CH attack. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently reported MF. The clinical presentation between CH patients with and without MF was not significantly different with the exception of aggravation of pain by effort (20.6% vs 4.1%) and facial sweating (13.2% vs 0.85%), both more frequent in CH patients with MF. CONCLUSION: Inferred from the results of our study, the presence of MF in CH patients had no important influence on the diagnosis and treatment of CH patients. The major differences of these 2 primary headache disorders, attack duration, lateralization, and the nature of associated symptoms, as delineated in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, are still useful tools for effective diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica/diagnóstico , Cefalalgia Histamínica/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/diagnóstico , Náusea/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Vómitos/diagnóstico , Vómitos/epidemiología
10.
Cephalalgia ; 33(10): 861-7, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23430982

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Aura occurs in 20-30% of patients with migraine. Some descriptions of aura go far beyond the most frequent visual and sensory symptoms, suggesting the involvement of different cortical areas. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the frequency and types of disorders of higher cortical functions (HCF) that occur during visual and/or sensory aura. METHODS: We interviewed 60 patients with visual and/or sensory aura about HCF disorders of praxia, gnosia, memory, and speech, during aura. Patients were divided into two groups, with and without HCF disorders, and were compared in terms of demographic data and aura characteristics. RESULTS: From all 60 patients, 65% reported at least one HCF disorder during aura. The patients with HCF disorders had longer-lasting auras (28.51 ± 16.39 vs. 19.76 ± 11.23, P = 0.016). The most common HCF disorders were motor dysphasia (82.05%) and dysnomia (30.74%). Motor dysphasia was more often reported by patients with visual as well as sensory aura ( P = 0.002). The number of HCF disorders correlated with the aura duration ( P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: According to our results, HCF disorders during aura occur more often than previously thought. The aura duration has some influence on the HCF disorders.


Asunto(s)
Corteza Cerebral/fisiología , Migraña con Aura/diagnóstico , Migraña con Aura/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA