RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While inter-hospital transfers for patients who have suffered major trauma have been well investigated, patient flows for other injured patients, or cases with orthopedic complications, are rarely described. This study aims to analyze the affected collective and to show possible reasons, patterns, and pitfalls to optimize the process in future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, all consecutive transfers to a Level I trauma center in Germany were documented and assessed. Patients suffering a major trauma were excluded. Data on the primary treating hospital, patient characteristics, and differences between emergency and elective surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included; 162 were injured, while 65 had suffered a complication after elective orthopedic surgery or had a complex orthopedic pathology. The most common diagnoses leading to transfer were pathologies of the extremities (n = 62), pathologies of the spine (n = 50), and infections (n = 18). The main reasons stated by the transferring hospitals were a lack of expertise (137 cases) and a lack of capacity (43 cases). There was a significantly higher rate of transfers due to trauma (n = 162) than for orthopedic patients (n = 65), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: There is currently no structured procedure or algorithm for transferring patients in orthopedics and trauma surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía de Cuidados Intensivos , Transferencia de Pacientes , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Hospitales , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of congenital muscular torticollis with tripolar release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, followed by modified postoperative treatment with a special orthosis. INDICATIONS: Muscular torticollis due to contracture of the sternocleidomastoid muscle; failure of conservative therapy. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Torticollis due to bony anomaly or other muscular contractures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Tenotomy of the sternocleidomastoid muscle occipitally and resection of at least 1â¯cm of the tendon at the sternal and clavicular origin. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Orthosis must be worn for 6 weeks 24â¯h/day, then for another 6 weeks 12â¯h/day. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were treated with tripolar release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and modified postoperative management. Average follow-up time was 25.7 months. One patient presented with recurrence after 3 years. No intra- or postoperative complications were observed.
Asunto(s)
Tortícolis , Humanos , Tortícolis/diagnóstico , Tortícolis/cirugía , Tortícolis/congénito , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tendones/cirugía , TenotomíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Tibialis anterior transfer in shuttle technique using the tunnelator is an atraumatic surgical technique without injuring the extensor retinaculum. The technique allows for postoperative treatment with pain-adapted full weight-bearing for 6 weeks in a lower leg cast which is simplified compared to the current literature. INDICATIONS: Passive, correctable clubfoot recurrences in the event of muscular imbalance (overbalanced anterior tibial muscle). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Structural movement restrictions of the foot, muscular insufficiency of the anterior tibial muscle, infection or cancerous lesions in the surgical site. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Loosen the tibialis anterior muscle at the base of the first metatarsal. Guide the tendon proximally out of the extensor retinaculum, then shuttle the tendon below the retinaculum with the help of the "tunnelator" and transosseous fixation at the lateral cuneiform. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Pain-adapted full weight-bearing in a lower leg walking cast for 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: In the course of a retrospective study, the above-mentioned surgical procedure was carried out in 20 patients (total nâ¯= 26 surgeries) between 2013 and 2019. After a follow-up of 12 months, complete correction of the clubfoot relapse was found in 88.5% of cases. There were no general or specific surgical complications.
Asunto(s)
Músculo Esquelético , Transferencia Tendinosa , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Músculo Esquelético/cirugía , DolorRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Supracondylar distal femoral osteotomy. Fixation with the contralateral TomoFix® (Fa. DePuy Synthes, Oberdorf, Switzerland) lateral distal femur plate. Use of the laterally reversed plate to improve the reconstruction of the sagittal anatomical axis of the leg. INDICATIONS: To correct knee flexion contractures with a deficiency of extension >20° at the age of 10 years. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Surgical site infections or tumors. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Ventral closed wedge osteotomy of the distal femur. Implantation of the locking compression TomoFix® lateral distal femur plate. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Full weight bearing. RESULTS: In all, 16 distal femoral osteotomies were performed in 9 patients. All patients had knee flexion contraction due to neurological disease. Patients with cerebral palsy showed a better GMFCS (gross motor function classification scale) level after surgery. Hardware was removed after 11.5 months (range: 9-18 months).
Asunto(s)
Fémur , Osteotomía , Placas Óseas , Niño , Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Proximal femoral osteotomies are common surgical interventions to treat hip deformities in pediatric orthopedics. The aim of proximal femoral osteotomies is to optimise hip containment by using varus or valgus osteotomy, flexion or extension osteotomy with shortening, lengthening or derotation of the femoral neck. Furthermore improved muscular dysbalance by enhancing the femoral offset, extension of the range of motion and pain reduction are important surgical intentions. In the long term, a proximal femoral osteotomy is meant to minimize the probability of an early osteoarthritis of the hip. In the current literature many different types of proximal femoral osteotomies are described. They can be divided concerning their anatomical localization into subcapital, base of the femoral neck, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric osteotomies. A profound knowledge about the deformity and the anatomical situation is essential to choose the appropriate osteotomy. The aim of this review is to show the different ways of proximal femoral osteotomies and their indications after having done a selective literature research. Furthermore over the last years the osteosynthesis materials have changed from blade plates (non-locking) to locking compression plates which allow an early re-mobilization without hip spica casts.
Asunto(s)
Fémur , Osteotomía , Adolescente , Placas Óseas , Niño , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/cirugía , Cuello Femoral , Humanos , Rango del Movimiento ArticularRESUMEN
RECOMMENDATION: Whenever a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is clinically possible or suspected, especially when elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels exist, and in correspondence to the literature on PJI in total hip and knee arthroplasties, joint aspiration is indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Consensus. DELEGATE VOTE: Agree: 100%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 0% (Unanimous, Strongest Consensus).
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Consenso , Humanos , SucciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with significant bone loss and compromised soft-tissues is challenging and the final results are often inferior to patient's expectation. The objective of this study was to present a comparison of outcomes in patients with failed infected TKA treated with two-stage revision TKA or knee arthrodesis and to assess clinical and functional results, implant survival and infection recurrence. The hypothesis was that an arthrodesis may result in beneficial effects on patients' outcome. METHODS: Clinical data of 81 patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee joint were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Between 2008 and 2014, a total of 36 patients had been treated within a two-stage exchange procedure and reimplantation of a modular intramedullary arthodesis nail and 45 patients with revision TKA. Patients were treated according to the same structured treatment algorithm. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the Oxford knee score (OKS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 32.9 ± 14.0 months. The rate of definitely free of infection at last follow-up in the arthrodesis group was 32 of 36 (88.9%) and 36 of 45 (80.0%) in the revision TKA group (p = 0.272). Mean VAS for pain in the arthrodesis group was 3.1 ± 1.4 compared to 3.2 ± 1.6 in the revision TKA group (p = 0.636). The OKS in the arthrodesis group was 38.7 ± 8.9 and 36.5 ± 8.9 (p = 0.246) in patients with revision TKA. Rate of revisions in the revision-TKA group was 2.8 ± 3.7 compared to 1.2 ± 2.4 in the arthrodesis group (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Treatment of PJI needs a distinct therapy with possible fallback strategies in case of failure. A knee arthrodesis is a limb salvage procedure that showed no significant benefits on the considered outcome factors compared to revision TKA but is associated with significantly lower revision rate. After exhausted treatment modalities, a knee arthrodesis should be considered as an option in selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Reoperación/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence of overweight and obesity has increased in the German population. Thus the number of obese patients treated with primary total joint arthroplasty has also increased. It is therefore predicted that the number of obese patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty will also increase. Nevertheless almost every manufacturer of commercially available revision arthroplasty implants states in his product safety guarantee that obesity is a relative or absolute contraindication. Data on revision total joint arthroplasty in obese patients are sparse. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the current literature on re-revision rate, infection rate, postoperative clinical outcome, and implant survival rate in obese patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty. Moreover, potential legal consequences and aspects are discussed which are essential for the surgeon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the online databases PubMed and identified clinical studies on obesity and overweight in revision total knee arthroplasty. Study quality was assessed using levels of evidence and the modified Jadad score. We also included descriptive data on case numbers, age, gender, height, weight and follow-up time. Current legal aspects were also analysed. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The average Jadad score was 1, the average level of evidence 3. In two studies, infection and revision occured more often in obese patients. Patients with morbid obesity had a higher risk of wound revision and periprosthetic joint infections. Three studies showed that obese patients had significantly lower scores for clinical outcome measures in function and pain. The legal aspect was not discussed in any of the five studies. Overall, published data are sparse and very heterogeneous. Therefore comparing these five studies is difficult. However, the results of our review suggest that obesity in revision total knee arthroplasty may have a negative influence on reoperation rate, infection rate and postoperative functional outcome. From a legal point of view, potential weight limitations of the implants intented for use have to be part of the oral preoperative discussion. The patient's informed consent has to be received and documented prior to revision total joint arthroplasty.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/legislación & jurisprudencia , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Mala Praxis/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obesidad/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reoperación/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication and reconstruction after failed revision total knee arthroplasty with significant bone loss and compromised soft-tissues can be challenging. Objective of this study was to assess clinical and functional results, implant survival and infection recurrence rates in patients treated with two-stage arthrodesis after failed revision TKA with extensor mechanism deficiencies due to PJI, and to identify the factors that affect outcomes after surgery. METHODS: Thirty seven patients with PJI treated within a two-stage exchange and reimplantation of an arthrodesis nail between 2008 and 2014 were included. Systemic and local risk factors were graded preoperatively according to McPherson et al. All patients were treated according to a structured treatment algorithm. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the Oxford Knee Score and the Visual Analogue Scale. RESULTS: Thirty two of 37 patients (86.5%) were graded as free of infection. Five patients (13.5%) had recurrent infection after arthrodesis with the need of revision surgery. Mean leg-length discrepancy was 2.2cm. The mean VAS for pain was three, the mean Oxford Knee Score was 38±9. Total implant survival at a 74month follow-up was 74.3% (95% CI: 45.4 to 91.1%), as determined by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Local McPherson Score, as well as number of revisions was found to be of significant influence to the survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Septic failure of revision knee arthroplasty can be effectively treated with two-stage arthrodesis using a modular intramedullary nail, providing a stable and painless limb with satisfactory functional results and acceptable infection eradication rates.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/instrumentación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Artrodesis/métodos , Desbridamiento , Remoción de Dispositivos , Humanos , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Reoperación/instrumentación , Reoperación/métodos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/etiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Irrigación TerapéuticaRESUMEN
AIM: To assess serum levels of RANK-ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) as biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and compare their accuracy with standard tests. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients presenting with a painful total knee or hip arthroplasty with indication for surgical revision were included in this prospective clinical trial. Based on standard diagnostics (joint aspirate, microbiological, and histological samples) and Musculoskeletal Infection Society consensus classification, patients were categorized into PJI, aseptic loosening, and control groups. Implant loosening was assessed radiographically and intraoperatively. Preoperative serum samples were collected and analyzed for RANKL, OPG, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase (AP), and the bone-specific subform of AP (bAP). Statistical analysis was carried out, testing for significant differences between the three groups and between stable and loose implants. RESULTS: All three groups were identical in regards to age, gender, and joint distribution. No statistically significant differences in the serum concentration of RANKL (P = 0.16) and OPG (P = 0.45) were found between aseptic loosening and PJI, with a trend towards lower RANKL concentrations and higher OPG concentrations in the PJI group. The RANKL/OPG ratio was significant for the comparison between PJI and non-PJI (P = 0.005). A ratio > 60 ruled out PJI in all cases (specificity: 100%, 95%CI: 89, 11% to 100.0%) but only 30% of non-PJI patients crossed this threshold. The positive predictive value remained poor at any cut-off. In the differentiation between stable and loose implants, none of the parameters measured (calcium, phosphate, AP, and bAP) showed a significant difference, and only AP and bAP measurements showed a tendency towards higher values in the loosened group (with P = 0.09 for AP and P = 0.19 for bAP). CONCLUSION: Lower RANKL and higher OPG concentrations could be detected in PJI, without statistical significance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Histopathological tissue analysis is a key parameter within the diagnostic algorithm for suspected periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), conventionally acquired in open surgery. In 2014, Hügle and co-workers introduced novel retrograde forceps for retrograde synovial biopsy with simultaneous fluid aspiration of the knee joint. We hypothesised that tissue samples acquired by retrograde synovial biopsy are equal to intra-operatively acquired deep representative tissue samples regarding bacterial detection and differentiation of periprosthetic infectious membranes. METHOD: Thirty patients (male n = 15, 50%; female n = 15, 50%) with 30 suspected PJIs in painful total hip arthroplasties (THAs) were included in this prospective, controlled, non-blinded trial. The results were compared with intra-operatively obtained representative deep tissue samples. RESULTS: In summary, 27 out of 30 patients were diagnosed correctly as infected (17/17) or non-infected (10/13). The sensitivity to predict a PJI using the Retroforce® sampling forceps in addition to standard diagnostics was 85%, the specificity 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde synovial biopsy is a new and rapid diagnostic procedure under local anaesthesia in patients with painful THAs with similar histological results compared to deep tissue sampling.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Biopsia/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Membrana Sinovial/microbiología , Anciano , Biopsia/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Líquido Sinovial/microbiología , Membrana Sinovial/patologíaRESUMEN
Prosthetic joint infections are a major challenge in total joint arthroplasty, especially in times of accumulating drug resistancies. Even though predictive risk classifications are a widely accepted tool to define a suitable treatment protocol a classification is still missing considering the difficulty in treating the -causative pathogen antibiotically. In this study, we present and evaluate a new predictive risk stratification for prosthetic joint infections in 120 cases, treated with a two-stage exchange. Treatment outcomes in 120 patients with proven prosthetic joint infections in hip and knee prostheses were regressed on time of infection, systemic risk factors, local risk factors and the difficulty in treating the causing pathogen. The main outcome variable was "definitely free of infection" after two years as published. Age, gender, and BMI were included as covariables and analyzed in a logistic regression model. 66 male and 54 female patients, with a mean age at surgery of 68.3 years±12.0 and a mean BMI of 26.05±6.21 were included in our survey and followed for 29.0±11.3 months. We found a significant association (p<0.001) between our score and the outcome parameters evaluated. Age, gender and BMI did not show a significant association with the outcome. These results show that our score is an independent and reliable predictor for the cure rate in prosthetic joint infections in hip and knee prostheses treated within a two-stage exchange protocol. Our score illustrates, that there is a statistically significant, sizable decrease in cure rate with an increase in score. In patients with prosthetic joint infections the validation of a risk score may help to identify patients with local and systemic risk factors or with infectious organisms identified as "difficult to treat" prior to the treatment or the decision about the treatment concept. Thus, appropriate extra care should be considered and provided.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Prótesis Articulares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Reoperación , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Hepática/epidemiología , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a serious and challenging complication after total joint arthroplasty. According to the literature, most PJI are monomicrobial infections caused by gram-positive cocci. The number of polymicrobial PJI might be underrepresented in the literature and only limited data are available regarding the outcome of polymicrobial PJI. Our hypothesis was that polymicrobial PJI are associated with a reduced cure rate compared with monomicrobial PJI. METHODS: Routine clinical data were collected and analysed retrospectively as anonymised, aggregated data. A total of 77 consecutive patients with 77 confirmed PJI and proven infectious organism of the hip and knee joint treated within a two-stage exchange concept and a follow-up ≥ two years were investigated. Detection of the infectious organism was based on multiple microbiological cultures taken intra-operatively. Superficial wound swabs or swabs from sinus tracts were not taken into account. Data were grouped into polymicrobial and monomicrobial PJI. The main outcome variable was "definitively free of infection after two years" as published. Second, we considered several variables as potential confounders or as risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 42 men and 35 women with 46 infected total hip arthroplasties and 31 infected total knee arthroplasties were evaluated. In 37 (46.6 %) of our 77 patients a polymicrobial PJI could be detected. We found a significant association between polymicrobial PJI and the outcome parameter definitively free of infection after two years with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.3 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.1-1.0]. The rate of patients graded as definitively free of infection after two years was 67.6 % for polymicrobial infections vs. 87.5 % for monomicrobial infections. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.2-1.0, p = 0.062) was identified as a borderline significant covariable. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that polymicrobial PJI might be underrepresented in the current literature. Additionally, the presence of multiple infectious organisms is associated with a reduced rate after two years with 67.6 vs 87.5 % for monomicrobial infections. Special attention and extra care should be considered for these patients.