Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Heart J ; 166(4): 760-7, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24093858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) improves exercise capacity, quality of life, emotional stress, and endothelial function in chronic heart failure with impaired systolic function. We sought to investigate the effects of FES on the above parameters in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: Thirty HFpEF patients, 18 female and 12 male, aged 69 ± 8 years, in New York Heart Association class II or III and with mean ejection fraction 63% ± 6%, were randomly (1:1) assigned to a 6-week FES program or placebo. Assessment was performed at baseline and after completion of training protocol and included 6-minute walked distance, quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory and Zung self-rated depression scores), B-type natriuretic peptide, endothelial function (flow-mediated dilatation), and left ventricular diastolic function. RESULTS: A significant improvement in 6-minute walked distance (F = 21.61, P = .001), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary (F = 8.68, P = .006), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (F = 6.43, P = .017), Beck Depression Inventory (F = 6.66, P = .015), Zung (F = 6.25, P = .019), and flow-mediated dilatation diameter (F = 11.98, P = .002) was observed in the FES group compared with placebo group; B-type natriuretic peptide also declined but not significantly (F = 0.249, P = .622), and there was a tendency toward lower mitral E/e' wave ratio (F = 3.066, P = .091). CONCLUSION: As in heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, FES also improves exercise capacity, quality of life, emotional status, and endothelial function in HFpEF. Given the lack of effective evidence-based therapies in these patients, FES warrants further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Emociones/fisiología , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Card Fail ; 16(3): 244-9, 2010 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20206900

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) improves exercise capacity and quality of life in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, there is no evidence regarding the effectiveness of this treatment modality according to the severity of CHF. This study compares the effectiveness of FES on exercise capacity, endothelial function, neurohormonal status, and emotional stress in New York Heart Association (NYHA) III-IV versus NYHA II patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen NYHA II and 13 age- and sex-matched NYHA III-IV patients with stable CHF (left ventricular ejection fraction <35%) underwent a 6-week FES training program. Questionnaires addressing quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, functional and overall), and emotional stress (Zung self-rating depression scale, Beck Depression Inventory), as well as plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), 6-minute walking distance test (6MWT), and endothelial function (flow-mediated dilatation [FMD]) were assessed at baseline and after completion of training protocol. 6MWT and plasma BNP improved significantly in 2 patient groups (both P < .001) after training program. The improvement of BNP was statistically greater in NYHA III-IV patients posttreatment than in those with NYHA II class (F=315.342, P < .001). Similarly, the improvement of 6MWT was statistically greater in NYHA III-IV group than in NYHA II patients (F=79.818, P < .001). Finally, an FES-induced greater improvement of FMD (F=9.517, P=.004) and emotional stress scores was observed in NYHA III-IV patients in comparison to NYHA II patients. There was a higher proportion of NYHA III-IV patients adhering to the FES training program for additional 3 months compared with the NYHA II group of patients (76.9% vs. 55.6%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: FES might exert a greater beneficial effect on clinical and neurohormonal status of NYHA III-IV patients in comparison to NYHA II patients. This effect may have important clinical relevance leading to increased adherence of severe CHF patients to exercise rehabilitation programs.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/clasificación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Pruebas de Función Cardíaca , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Cooperación del Paciente , Probabilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA