RESUMEN
High calcified PCI are challenging because immediate and follow-up results are not optimal. We recommend using a specific preparation of these lesions, especially using atherectomy which can itself provide complications. We illustrate our comments with a clinical case where we have decided to treat a long-calcified lesion from left main to distal left artery descending with a specific preparation according orbital atherectomy. Procedure was complicated by a coronary perforation with favorable evolution. This case allows to report how to prevent a such complication and to remember how should we have to treat it.
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Humanos , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Anciano , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Background: Transcatheter closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is performed in cryptogenic stroke and other conditions. Information is lacking for some devices. Methods: We aimed to evaluate the Figulla Flex II PFO Occluder (FFP) and Figulla Flex UNI Occluder (FFU) through a retrospective multi-center registry. Results: 527 patients were included. Mean age was 48.9 (±13.8) years. The procedure was under transthoracic, transesophageal or intracardiac echocardiography in 185 (35.1%), 193 (36.6%) and 149 (28.3%) cases, respectively, and under general anesthesia in 191 patients (36.2%). The FFP and FFU were used in 408 (77.4%) and 119 (22.6%) cases, respectively. The success rate was 99.1%. Median follow-up was 1.1 (0.5-2.5) years. A new atrial fibrillation/flutter within six months occurred in 14 (2.7%) cases, with no difference between devices. One device embolization in the pulmonary artery was identified two years post-procedure. Residual shunts occurred in 18 (6.9%) cases at 1 year, with TIA in three (16.6%) patients. Out of 437 patients with stroke/TIA, 260 (59%) were followed more than one year after closure. Median follow-up was 2.1 (1.17-3.1) years, with four recurrent strokes/TIA. Conclusions: The FFP and FFU devices are safe and effective for PFO closure, with very few atrial fibrillation/flutter and neurologic events, except in cases with a residual shunt.