Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 75(4): 455-60, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21333364

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of propranolol in infantile airway haemangiomas and compare the effectiveness of propranolol vs. different therapies. METHODS: A literature search of Ovid, Embase, the Cochrane database, Google™ Scholar, and Medline using PubMed as the search engine was performed to identify studies that analysed the effect of propranolol treatment in children with airway haemangiomas. Random-effect meta-analytical techniques were conducted for the outcome measures. RESULTS: Thirteen studies, comprising 36 patients were included in the analysis. Propranolol was found to be an effective intervention for the resolution of infantile airway haemangiomas (P<0.00001). Meta-analysis of effectiveness of propranolol vs. steroids, CO(2) laser, or vincristine showed that propranolol is the most effective treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that propranolol should be recommended as a first-line treatment in infantile airway haemangiomas. However, because of the possible side effects of propranolol, current infantile haemangioma treatment centres recommend a full cardiovascular and respiratory review be performed prior to initiation of therapy.


Asunto(s)
Hemangioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemangioma/mortalidad , Neoplasias Laríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Propranolol/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Hemangioma/congénito , Hemangioma/patología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Neoplasias Laríngeas/congénito , Neoplasias Laríngeas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Propranolol/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 268(5): 661-70, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21246209

RESUMEN

The purpose of the study was to compare CA-9 positivity versus CA-9 negativity in head and neck malignancies and to correlate levels of CA-9 with tumor grade, size, and nodal status. Overall and disease-free survival were also compared for CA-9 positive and negative tumors. A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane databases for studies between 1990 and 2009. Carbonic anhydrase IX, CA IX, CA-9, head and neck, and survival were used as search terms. Random-effect meta-analytical techniques were conducted for outcome measures of overall survival and disease-free survival. Sixteen studies matched the selection criteria, reporting on 1,470 patients. Eight hundred and forty two specimens were reported as being CA-9 positive or negative: 512 (60.81%) were CA-9 positive and 330 (39.19%) were CA-9 negative. Nine hundred and eighty specimens had levels of CA-9 expression recorded: 547 (55.82%) had high levels of CA-9 and 433 (44.18%) had low CA-9 levels. Survival was significantly reduced if the tumor was positive for CA-9 (P < 0.0001). Disease-free survival is significantly reduced in patients with CA-9 positive (P = 0.0008) head and neck malignant tumors. The presence of CA-9 in head and neck malignant tumors is associated with reduced overall survival and disease-free survival.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Anhidrasas Carbónicas/análisis , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico , Anhidrasa Carbónica IX , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Compuestos de Organotecnecio , Oximas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 74(11): 1203-8, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20832871

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the range of medical and surgical therapies for children with PFAPA syndrome. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane databases for studies between 1987 and 2010 that compared PFAPA treatment in children (surgical versus medical). Random-effect meta-analytical techniques were conducted for the outcome measures. RESULTS: The use of antibiotics and cimetidine in PFAPA syndrome are ineffective. However, there is evidence that the use of steroids is effective in the resolution of symptoms. Tonsillectomy (+/- adenoidectomy) as a treatment of PFAPA was found to be an effective intervention for resolution of symptoms (P<0.00001). Meta-analysis of surgery versus cimetidine and surgery versus antibiotics demonstrated that surgery is a significantly more effective treatment for PFAPA syndrome. A comparison of treatment with steroids or surgery did not show any statistically significant difference, confirming the effectiveness of both therapies for the resolution of PFAPA syndrome (P=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The most effective non-surgical therapy is corticosteroids. However, they do not prevent future fever cycles. The results of this meta-analysis showed that tonsillectomy (+/- adenoidectomy) is the most effective intervention for long-term resolution of PFAPA syndrome symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre/terapia , Linfadenitis/terapia , Faringitis/terapia , Estomatitis Aftosa/terapia , Adenoidectomía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Cimetidina/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Síndrome , Tonsilectomía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA