RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Primary breast lymphoma is a rare disease. The small number of patients and the paucity of data make large-series studies difficult. We conducted a pooled analysis to evaluate the treatment outcome and prognostic factors in patients with primary breast lymphoma. METHODS: In a search of PUBMED and MEDLINE we found 7 observational studies with 93 patientsthatwere eligible for inclusion. Treatments included single therapy or combined surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We analyzed the correlation between treatment protocols, tumor relapse and survival. Histopathology and cancer stage were analyzed to evaluate their significance in treatment outcome. RESULTS: All 93 patients were female, with a mean age of 57 years. The histopathology of 63 patients (68%) was diffuse large cell lymphoma. According to Ann Arbor classification, 57% were stage I, 23% were stage II, 4% were stage III, and 16% were stage IV. Thirteen percent received surgery alone, 27% received chemotherapy alone, 7% received radiotherapy alone, 10% received surgery and chemotherapy, 10% received surgery and radiotherapy, 22% received chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and 11% received surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. With a median follow-up duration of 34 months (mean, 53 months), 48% had relapse of disease, 50% had no relapse, while 2% had disease progression. The mean time to first tumor relapse after treatment was 20 months. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 70% and 56%, respectively. Radiotherapy was a significant prognostic factor predicting tumor relapse (P=0.044). Tumor stage was a significant prognostic factor affecting overall survival, disease-free survival and disease-specific survival (P=0.0231, 0.0015, 0.0124, respectively). CONCLUSION: With a 3-year overall survival rate of 70%, the high relapse rate of 48% is a cause for concern. Patients who received chemotherapy and radiotherapy had better survival outcome and a lower relapse rate. We suggestthat chemotherapy and radiotherapy be the initial treatment for patients with primary breast lymphoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Linfoma de Burkitt/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Burkitt/epidemiología , Linfoma de Burkitt/terapia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/clasificación , Linfoma/terapia , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/epidemiología , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/terapia , Linfoma Folicular/diagnóstico , Linfoma Folicular/epidemiología , Linfoma Folicular/terapia , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/epidemiología , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcome of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, who had either failed with or were unsuited for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and to determine the prognostic outcome factors. METHODS: From September 1999 to March 2003, 44 patients with unresectable HCC underwent 3DCRT. Thirty-seven patients were male and seven female. Mean age was 62 years, ranging from 34 to 88. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0 in 10 patients, 1 in 19 patients, and 2 in 15 patients. According to Child-Pugh classification for cirrhosis of the liver, 32 patients were in class A and 12 patients in class B. There were 14 patients with main portal vein thrombosis. Twenty patients had alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level >400 ng/ml. Tumor size was <5 cm in 16 patients, 5-10 cm in 16 patients, and >10 cm in 12 patients. Thirty-two patients had tumors of confluent type, the remaining patients presented a single hepatic tumor. Serum hepatitis antigen markers were positive for type B in 35 patients and type C in nine patients. Twenty-one patients had Okuda Stage I, 22 patients Stage II, and one patient Stage III. According to the AJCC staging system (5th edition), eight patients were in Stage II (T2N0M0), 19 in Stage IIIA (T3N0M0) and 17 in Stage IVA (T4N0M0). RESULTS: An objective response was observed in 27 of 44 patients, giving a response rate of 61.4%. The survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 60.5%, 40.3% and 32.0%, respectively. In the analysis of prognostic factors, Okuda stage, AJCC stage, portal vein thrombosis, pretreatment AFP level, and total dose of radiotherapy all had significant impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS: 3DCRT induced a substantial tumor response rate of 61.4% with survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years of 60.5%, 40.3% and 32.0%, respectively, and a median survival time of 15.2 months in patients with unresectable HCC who had either failed with or were unsuited for TACE. The complications are acceptable and can be managed with conservative treatment. Although we do not know whether there is a survival benefit through the use of this treatment, 3DCRT seems to be a practical method of salvage for this subset of patients. Further study is warranted to evaluate the survival of such patients with and without this treatment.